It's directly relevant to the game, and it's hardly as though our eight posts on the subject have derailed the game.Claus wrote: Xyl, Volkann, I don't see the point of this discussion on policy lynching of millers. Please focus your brains in more productive causes.
My summary of game and players. Recent enough.Claus wrote: If there is a recent post which
outlines your view of the players, feel free to link to it instead.
This from Sera just doesnt come accross well to me. Just stinks of someone with some information, setting the balance either further against Putas likely replacement.Seraphim wrote:If you don't die tonight, please, be sure to give us results every single morning. Or we will lynch you.
Have a nice day.
Thats really not the case.Sir Tornado wrote: 2) I think Der Hammer is someone's alt who is trying to screw this game up by not taking it seriously. I am suspicious of usernames which include any mafia terminology to be alts in the first place, and his behavior upto page 10 doesn't do anything to dissuade me.
The ease at which he accepts it? Just looking quickly for a lynch in my opinion.Seraphim wrote:Sounds good enough for me.
Vote: Der Hammer
(oh yeah, I'm back, lol. I'm catching up now but as I read the post above me, claiming miller and voting for oneself is bad play)
No way I am going to tolerate an auto-lynch of a claimed miller, but my hope of forcing out some content to analyse has paid off.This is completely meaningless.DH wrote: The striking features are the whole Hoopla, BM conflict, and in that I think both come out looking scummy. Obviously this is unlikely, but I think one of them may turn up scum. Seems an early attempt by one of them, to try and clear themselves for the rest of the game as scum wouldn't put themselves out in the limelight so early.
Is Tubby's stupidity scummy?DH wrote: Sensfan, and then Tubby also stand out as late suspects on Page 10. Tubby's attempts to act stupid look dodgy, as does Sensfans inconcisency throughout the whole day.
Uh, that's a pretty reasonable thing to say to a lousy claimed cop.DH wrote:This from Sera just doesnt come accross well to me. Just stinks of someone with some information, setting the balance either further against Putas likely replacement.Sera wrote: If you don't die tonight, please, be sure to give us results every single morning. Or we will lynch you.
Have a nice day.
You have been playing like trash all game; you then attempted to give up and be lynched; and you claimed Miller. I am by no means fond of his vote (no explanation as to why you should be lynched), but you're not exactly in any position to be throwing accusations around about. It is unacceptable that you would play so atrociously at this stage of the game (to the point of advocating yourDer Hammer wrote:Look at the reactions to my bombshell.
The ease at which he accepts it? Just looking quickly for a lynch in my opinion.Seraphim wrote:Sounds good enough for me.
Vote: Der Hammer
(oh yeah, I'm back, lol. I'm catching up now but as I read the post above me, claiming miller and voting for oneself is bad play)
Vote:Seraphim
I know. He's spent the whole game playing like an asshole and then, when I throw him a lifeline, he totally backflips. HmmXyl wrote: I really don't like how quickly Der Hammer backs off his self-vote. It completely wipes out the "scum wouldn't do that" argument.
What utter rot. He's not allowed to attack players because he is scummy? Basically, that's an ad hominem, and I know that in mafia the player himself does have an impact on whether the case is valid or not (you wouldn't lynch based on the case of a confirmed scum, for example) but presenting a case is not a privilege that must be earnt by acting town. How the hell else is he supposed to dig his way out of the mess he's in except by presenting attacks on others? Defending himself? From what? His own accusations?am by no means fond of his vote (no explanation as to why you should be lynched), but you're not exactly in any position to be throwing accusations around about. It is unacceptable that you would play so atrociously at this stage of the game (to the point of advocating your own lynch), and then snap at your attackers
Take a breather, calm down.vollkan wrote: You have been playing like trash all game; you then attempted to give up and be lynched; and you claimed Miller. I am by no means fond of his vote (no explanation as to why you should be lynched), but you're not exactly in any position to be throwing accusations around about. It is unacceptable that you would play so atrociously at this stage of the game (to the point of advocating yourownlynch), and then snap at your attackers.
I noted ZZ and Sens are both in the lurks lack of info area. However Sens I do have notice is having RL issues. Also many including myself have been prodded.Xylthixlm wrote:Who?farside22 wrote:Can I ask why you are focused on killa seven when others are lurking just as badly?Xylthixlm wrote:Caught up yet?killa seven wrote:I'm back, catching up.
