Mini 703 - A Roccisi Autumn - Over

[darkdude]

Voting.

[chuckrock]

edit by way of post -- I left chuck out of the original list of lurkers I wanted an answer from, so the EBWOP corrected that omission.

Has anyone noticed that he hasn't posted since I replaced in?

Yeah. My attitude hasn't changed since then. I guess I've actually got to reread things to get back into it. I've been extremely busy with work.

[Korts]

chuckrock, please answer the questions posed at you.

[TDC]

Vote Count

IH (3): Adel, darkdude, tubby216
Adel (2): Rage, chuckrock
Darkdude (2): Ectomancer, Korts

Not voting (3): IH, Sweenytodd, ThAdmiral

Sweenytodd replaces Lionheart.
IH: I will give you the same chance Lionheart had.

[tubby216]

sorry getting retrained at my job,, i am not really v/la i am just kinda swamped

[TDC]

Prodding Ectomancer.

[Ectomancer]

post

[Korts]

Adel:

This post of Ecto's

Ecto, I'm not saying everyone on that wagon is suspect. Just a couple people. Given that you're not on any wagon, I'm also wondering why you're defending people without letting them answer on their own.

As for Tarballs, there is now a pattern of joining big wagons at opportune times. I don't know if that's deliberate, or it just happened that way. He hasn't posted enough for me to make a full judgment. The only time his one big/useful post mentioned Puta was about him being scummy for the "killing a cat" comment, which I took to be at best a joke on Tarballs' part. It feels like EasyWagoning at the moment.

Defending? It's called educating. You showed a lack of understanding regarding pressure votes being used to change the behavior of a player. Case, point, and example laid out for you right here in this game.
In any case, assume you could interpret my post as defending someone, what relevance would my lack of a presence on a wagon have to do with that defense?

Now a couple questions of you. If you are so sold on Tarball, why is your vote still on Rage, who is one of the recipients of Tarball's votes that you are using to make your case? Is that a sloppy bus? If not, isn't your case on Tarball dependent upon Rage being town?

Also of interest...why would you give Puta a clean slate? What comment would have inspired you to make that statement?

Summary: I see you mudslinging with seemingly contradictory premises. Your vote is sticking to Rage while you probe reactions to your statements about 2 other players.
Then, on the flip side, you give a "clean slate" to a player at L-2, whose alignment just might get revealed today.

Isn't that amusing?[/quote]

Expresses suspicion to me. I couldn't find similar posts from other players though, so it seems I was mistaken in the "considerable pressure" statement when it comes to multiple players pressuring.

[Korts]

Bah. Sorry about the quote tags, seems Ecto added an additional [/quote] tag when he quoted Macavity. It's Ecto's post 13 in isolation FTR if someone wants a little clearer post.

[ThAdmiral]

why is IH the leading lynch?

[Korts]

I agree. Bandwagon darkdude.

[darkdude]

I'm waiting for the lurkers who Adel have called out to respond to her question before saying anything about myself, by the way.

[Sweenytodd]

I'm here, will post once I've read more thoroughly.

[tubby216]

i promise this weekend i will post some real content

[Adel]

this level of participation is crap.

all of the lurks can't be scum, but their collective behavior sure does make it easier for scum to win.

[Korts]

CHUCKROCK, PLEASE ANSWER ADEL'S QUESTION

IH too, preferably with something else on the game itself.

Sweeneytodd also needs to post

Meanwhile, everyone's welcome on the darkdude wagon.

[Ectomancer]

IH is in this game?

[TDC]

Prodding IH again, simultaneously searching replacement. He will be replaced immediately if he doesn't pick up his prod.
People on the verge of being prodded: tubby216, chuckrock, Rage.

A friendly reminder: 10 days to deadline. Majority of votes

cast

needed to lynch.

[Ectomancer]

this level of participation is crap.

all of the lurks can't be scum, but their collective behavior sure does make it easier for scum to win.

My case against DarkDude has been expressed, re-expressed, and withstood questioning put to it. I stand by it.
However, there is no good reason for me to repeat it ad infinitum, nor is there really anything else in regards to DarkDude to expound upon. It is a simple case with 2 parts that make the whole of it.

If there is a case that I can be convinced of and we need the lynch before a deadline, I might switch votes to facilitate it, but you can expect my vote to be right back on DarkDude, rehashing the same case.

[Adel]

I think that darkdude is scum, and either Korts or Ectomancer is bussing him, but probably not both of them.

I think we should lynch darkdude today, and either Korts or Ectomancer tomorrow after darkdude proves to be scum. I wouldn't normally suggest a lynch order like this, bu I expect to get night killed (WIFOM TRAP) tonight.

[Adel]

oh damn, I nearly forgot!

unvote, vote:darkdude

[TDC]

chuckrock has requested replacement.
Prodding tubby216 and Rage.

[ThAdmiral]

I don't see the motivation to bus at this stage. They could have just gone along with one of the other cases and gone into day 3 with all their people alive.

With this level of activity do you think the mafia would really feel the need to bus?

[tubby216]

sorry for inactivity will post soon today,

[Rage]

Post.

I'd like to hear from Sweenytodd. More than one fresh outlook on this game might be of some use.