In post 1270, Dunnstral wrote:
To expand on my point in 1266, it is weird to me that RH9 has an impression of me that I don't gambit, but does not seem to be considering that when thinking I could be mafia. I think that if RH9 is being truthful, they should look at Luke's track result on me and conclude that I am more likely town than not, because to them I would have to be gambitting to be mafia.
Now that I am thinking about this, they also very quickly jumped to saying I might fake claim beholder at the start of the day. Doesn't this also contradict their thinking here, since that would be a gambit?
I
did not
suggest you fakeclaim Beholder.
Stop reframing the narrative.
I suggested Beholder is a
plausible scum role
you could have and
target Luke with
.
And anyways scum claiming doctor when tracked to the tracker is not gambity at all.
It's just what scum would do, since it's the most believable claim.
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
RH has instituted the strongest protection from meta, and that is to post a "Congrats town/scum" for who ever won every game ever, making it impossible to quickly look at his past games.
(That is very likely an exaggeration of reatlity, but I ran into that 3 games in a row when I was looking just now, and it was enough for me to abandon the endeavor)
In post 1281, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
this feels like that time peta caught RH9 in PYP and he just immediately ghosted after throwing some random non answer at him
I realized reading back through RH's iso, that while he made a lot of comments this game, it largely ended up being very abstract. Things like doing math on the balance of the game and claims without ever making substantive comments about the actual actions of the players. Or engaging with his image of Dunn as a non-gambity player, but without following through on it with a solid read on Dunn.
And I looked back at a past game we had before, and it has reinforced that thought. Like, where were these kinds of takes this game:
In post 439, RH9 wrote:
By the way, the swap reinforced my reads.
I think that Dwlee was distancing from marci during D1 so that when they were apart and marci flipped red, scum could use this flip to make STD misvote.
I don't.
I think that they feel pretty non-committal. Other than voicing a suspicion on marci and stating their intention to reaccess Pooky, they have zero reads on us.
They don't even mention me which according to you, Pooky did, and you used to justify your SR on me.
In post 683, RH9 wrote:
Yeah. My read has evolved. I've been starting to reconsider my read on Dwlee. In a vacuum, they actually seem all right though a bit non-committal as seen in 253.
However, this conflicts with my read on STD, who reads as wrongly tunnelled Town as in his latest stream of posts.
Especially, the amount of insight that he has put in. If I had to bet for scum out of my minigame, I would be forced to say Dwlee despite improvements in my read of them.
A lot of the "takes" he made this game, were him agreeing with things other people said. I think that the closest thing I saw to this in his iso, was him picking up that Cakez dropped his GL scum read over night, but then he completely dropped it after literally just the one post, so :shrug:
Like, just in those three post I grabbed he was pointing out specific thoughts he had on:
A player attempting to distance with another player
The player being overly non-committal with reads
The player having a lack of reads in general
A player appearing to be tunneled town
A player having a lot of insight put into their read.
-----
And this game, it is more just naming off pairs, and saying that they would not work together as a team. For some reason.
In post 1283, Lukewarm wrote:
RH has instituted the strongest protection from meta, and that is to post a "Congrats town/scum" for who ever won every game ever, making it impossible to quickly look at his past games.
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
