Oh, okay. That takes away that point against raider's claim.Malt wrote:@iLord: My double vote is permenant: I have it all the time.
That would fit mechanically, but I don't know enough about flavor to say anything else about it.Malt wrote:On a different note: Maybe Saria was my backup?
Yeah, my reaction to this was exactly the same thing as iLord's. I mean, Rauru was the sage of light, obviously, he had light arrows. Sure, zelda has light arrows, but couldn't there be other people that fit?!Natirasha wrote:Vote: Mathusis
Fell exactly into my trap. I was looking for the source of the Light Arrows.
You shouldn't even be assuming that you would be saying anything like that. Clearly, if you had said "dont look at me I didnt vote for him", we would have interpreted that as scummy, because saying "I strongly support a MSSK lynch" pretty much carries the same weight as voting (to me, at least).raider8169 wrote:Because I would have been encouraging someone to die and yet after the flip been like "dont look at me I didnt vote for him".andersonw wrote:Why is it scummy to tell someone else to hammer? It seems that if you had told malthusis that you were okay with a hammer, it would have been just like as if you had voted, since you were supporting MafiaSSK's lynch.
No, that was the reason I wanted massclaim.iLord wrote:You made us massclaim for that?Nat wrote:Vote: Mathusis
Fell exactly into my trap. I was looking for the source of the Light Arrows.
Are you kidding me?
There's so many ways that the light arrows could be justified, that this idea by itself by no means justifed a massclaim.
Congrats with your sonSilverPhoenix, Talon, 1-Shot Bulletproof Townie, Lynched Day 2
What do you mean when you ask raider to explain that?Next bit, Raider, can you explain this:
Quote:
SilverPhoenix, Talon, 1-Shot Bulletproof Townie, Lynched Day 2
Isn't this the same as the 1-shot bulletproof townie (SP's past role)Raider wrote:I can survive one night attack which was used up.
You have anything to say about this Malt?Malt wrote:My theory is that the scum team's kill is done through light arrows (or it has no kill at all). There's only a few people in the series who had them, namely Zelda, Sheik and Link (and link is dead). Sheik is also a character that wasn't in the past in any form or way, and the killings started in the future. Therefore, SSK=Sheik=Scum or vig or any other killing role. You can see through this inference that Sheik shot Link (Who had claimed and had no reason to be doubted) which in my mind means SSK=anti-town.
If you don't remember, this was your hint when Pesco accused you of being those two old witches. This was why I thought you were Zelda as she has an alter ego. This would have made her actually two characters (that explains your double vote), but you aren't two characters (which gives truth to your hint).Malt wrote:Where did I say I was two people
From my experience, they're generally told so.Zazie wrote:Also, does anybody know if you get a message when you as 1-shot bulletproof townie are targeted by scum?
You call SSK here anti-town as he was accused of being Sheik. You came up with Sheik being anti-town. Why would you say that if you are Sheik?Malt wrote:My theory is that the scum team's kill is done through light arrows (or it has no kill at all). There's only a few people in the series who had them, namely Zelda, Sheik and Link (and link is dead). Sheik is also a character that wasn't in the past in any form or way, and the killings started in the future. Therefore, SSK=Sheik=Scum or vig or any other killing role. You can see through this inference that Sheik shot Link (Who had claimed and had no reason to be doubted) which in my mind means SSK=anti-town.
However, I want to discuss things first as he could hammer himself with one more vote if he's scum and there are two left.
I have nothing do with being Sheik, I do not change when it is the future.Also, why would I hammer myself?