In post 976, ofrhz wrote:
In post 762, BlueSnakelet wrote:
Ok, I paid attention to ofrhz. Mostly the things It's Highness pointed out in
#472.
I read Ranger and ofrhz combined ISOs. From #15 to #91 it's all Ranger (including her readlists). From #97 to #112 it's all ofrhz talking about things other than Ranger. The next post from either of them is ofrhz's "serious" vote on Ranger, which he later explains was because of Ranger's readlists.
I agree, this development makes 0 sense. ofrhz voted without a reason, and then invented a reason when questioned.
VOTE: ofrhz
The omgus within me must respond to this. How much trajectory do you think I should have had from
97 to
112?
From your very first post in the game until your Ranger vote, Ranger didn't post a thing. You joined, talked for a bit, read the few earlier pages, formed a scumread based on that, and then made a naked vote.
That doesn't track. If you had a reason for voting Ranger, you would share it before/while you voted.
In post 1052, Alisae wrote:
ofrhz vote bad
guy does not want to be right
i think the guy if he is town should be able to be decently townie and easy to find and this isn't it.
to me it just looks obv
Yes, I do.
In post 1095, Alisae wrote:
In post 40, Doctor Drew wrote:
Someone better start obv towning, I might just be your lord a savior who can save your soul.
Or something like that, I had too much sun and too much rum today so I don't know what's going on.
I did actually walk on water though.
this post is not written by mafia sry koba
Why not? Mafia can shitpost too.
In post 1112, ofrhz wrote:
In post 727, BlueSnakelet wrote:
In post 715, Doctor Drew wrote:
[...]
But ya, as I said I don't think Ranger was actually complicit in it and was just Koba seemingly purposely going over the top.
[...]
I'd like to state for the record that this is
not
what Drew said before. He said that he thinks that both Koba and Ranger were playing a theater, but he
might
be wrong about Ranger.
Drew's weak scumread on Ranger became a townread. Which is fine of course, but this feels like gaslighting.
Do you find this progression to be scummy instead of coming from a townie changing their mind? The Ranger trajectory feels fairly believable to me. This post feels like picking at an ~inconsistency~ but also picking at one that doesn't seem to be there. See:
505
At the time I took Drew's "I don't think Ranger was complicit in it" to mean "I think Ranger wasn't complicit in it", which was wrong, sorry. It Drew had said that, then he would be implying that he was townreading Ranger all along.
In post 1124, Alisae wrote:
In post 1110, HighPrincessErinys wrote:
Willing to bet good money on atleast 2 scum in ofrhz/Pooky/Alisae/Drew, but for my sanity this one is gonna just go and take it's shower and relax for the rest of the night. Toodle-oo
Why am I mafia?
ofrhz is probably mafia, and as soon as I jumped in their wagon you immediately formed a counterwagon on flimsy reasoning.
In post 1170, ofrhz wrote:
Idk I'm refraining from voting Pooky because
1142 makes it seem like he genuinely didn't realize how he was coming across.
Rereading HPE's ISO, I remember how much I disliked
472 though. The cherry on top is that BlueSnakelet liked this post and cited it as a reason to scum read me
Why didn't you like 472? The only reason you ever cited was OMGUS.
In post 1196, Dannflor wrote:
Why is there such a large burden of proof assigned to the BlueSnakelet wagon that has not been applied to literally any other wagon in the game up until now?
It's not. You're the only one putting any effort into scumreading me.
631 immediately pinged me because it's *too* transparent, while not consisting of much content either. At the end of this wall, I cannot tell where BlueSnakelet stands on either Ranger or Kkoba, except for the idea that they aren't buddies. Everything is "understandable," or "NAI." There are no hard opinions in this post. The biggest stance BlueSnakelet takes is that kkoba did not look argumentative.
That post is absolutely pro-Koba. I chose to use the more neutral "is at worst NAI" because I was arguing against posts that insisted that Koba was scum rotten. I thought it would be easier to sell on Koba being neutral than town.
I absolutely think Koba's selection of meta is towny, because scum creating a fake case would be more careful with their selection than town speaking their mind.
What does the post do? It screams "look at me I'm so town!" The phrasing of "I was going to suspect Ranger" feels overly self aware. It wants people to know that it has had a thought process and change of mind about Ranger. I don't think townie's generally phrase posts like this. Townies aren't this self conscious about their thought processes. Wherever they end up on a slot, they are gonna share that. They'd just say, "I'm not suspecting Ranger." But that phrasing, and the post as a whole, feels like BlueSnakelet using a lot of words to show that he is "solving," while not really saying anything substantial at all.
I wrote that post while catching up on the discussion. Originally, the post did contain a blatant scumread on Ranger, but when I reached the end I changed my mind, erased the scumread and replaced it with the "I was going to suspect Ranger" paragraph.
Does anyone actually think that naked voting is a scum tell? Because that is basically what this post by BlueSnakelet boils down to. I do not believe that BlueSnakelet actually believes in this case. It, again, smells like trying to look solvey without having any substance behind it.
Do
you
think that naked voting is a scum tell? Because that's literally my reason to suspect ofrhz.
Like, tbh, this post is one of the best town cases someone has made on ofrhz all game.
Is this your response to my last question? The reason your read on ofrhz was "cooling off" is literally because of me?
In post 886, BlueSnakelet wrote:
In post 868, Dannflor wrote:
I simply do not believe Blue’s read on ofrhz
My scum read on ofrhz is cooling off as well
Idk what you want me to do *not* vote people I think are scum?
You pressured me to vote for someone and asked my opinion on ofrhz. So I read their ISO and formed an opinion on them.
Why is your scum read on ofrhz "cooling off"? What changed since last time?
Let he who is with sin, and loves it, cast the final stone.