we found one group already let's lim in that group I'm willing to ignore camel for the greater good.In post 1724, Theta Alpine wrote: i mean
kind of the point of the mass claim was to set out all the roles and see if we can identify any groups of one or groups of four
and also see how many groups we can identify to begin with
we are just waiting on dragoneater to actually claim so that the info cannot get used to craft fake claims
then what would actually convince you that there is a group? it seems like we had a good shot with what drew presented but it seems like for whatever you reason you didn't want to take a leap of faith and assume drew was correct. or have yourself up to be a chance at being limmed. or call someone in that group scum. whatever your reasons actually are we can't know them. if everyone agrees that we are in fact a group would you then be willing to lim in between us? you invoked town group think in mass claiming necessity will you do the same if they say we all should be up for the axe?In post 1726, Theta Alpine wrote: this requires an assumption that just having modifiers constitutes a group
that is not exactly the strongest amount of theming plus roles that interact with modifiers specifically exist bringing the total up past four
In post 1725, Political Clout wrote:we found one group already let's lim in that group I'm willing to ignore camel for the greater good.In post 1724, Theta Alpine wrote: i mean
kind of the point of the mass claim was to set out all the roles and see if we can identify any groups of one or groups of four
and also see how many groups we can identify to begin with
we are just waiting on dragoneater to actually claim so that the info cannot get used to craft fake claims
pc
koba
drew
theta
which one is scum?
In post 1726, Theta Alpine wrote: this requires an assumption that just having modifiers constitutes a group
that is not exactly the strongest amount of theming plus roles that interact with modifiers specifically exist bringing the total up past four
PC is focusing on what I thought could be a group.
Yeah, that's what I've been thinking, that Bingle is probably same grouping of roles as mine. How many people are going to make a "can't receive new abilities" role without including any roles that can give new abilities?In post 1731, Theta Alpine wrote: oddly enough i think aureal might actually fit into that grouping given the interaction with bingle
I'm hoping to demonstrate what's wrong with it. you saw how theta reacted they refused to group in when their life might be at stake. getting a bunch of people to agree on their death is not going to be possible or feasible. theta pivoted off pretty hard with misdirection and deflection and then ended up saying you would be the lim in the group of 4. and now we have you here saying that the group is only a possibility. however you chop it up it doesn't matter people will find excuses to say oh woah wait that grouping I just made and people said was good now doesn't make sense at all.In post 1733, Doctor Drew wrote:In post 1725, Political Clout wrote:we found one group already let's lim in that group I'm willing to ignore camel for the greater good.In post 1724, Theta Alpine wrote: i mean
kind of the point of the mass claim was to set out all the roles and see if we can identify any groups of one or groups of four
and also see how many groups we can identify to begin with
we are just waiting on dragoneater to actually claim so that the info cannot get used to craft fake claims
pc
koba
drew
theta
which one is scum?In post 1726, Theta Alpine wrote: this requires an assumption that just having modifiers constitutes a group
that is not exactly the strongest amount of theming plus roles that interact with modifiers specifically exist bringing the total up past fourPC is focusing on what I thought could be a group.In post 1727, Skygazer wrote: plus i have a modifier :dead:
Why they are drilling so deep on it I do not know, especially when I said myself I might not be accurate here(pointed out here by Skygazer here with a modifier).
Not sure your goal here PC
Ok fair enough, I do agree Theta tried to pivot away from my 'group'.In post 1735, Political Clout wrote:I'm hoping to demonstrate what's wrong with it. you saw how theta reacted they refused to group in when their life might be at stake. getting a bunch of people to agree on their death is not going to be possible or feasible. theta pivoted off pretty hard with misdirection and deflection and then ended up saying you would be the lim in the group of 4. and now we have you here saying that the group is only a possibility. however you chop it up it doesn't matter people will find excuses to say oh woah wait that grouping I just made and people said was good now doesn't make sense at all.In post 1733, Doctor Drew wrote:In post 1725, Political Clout wrote:we found one group already let's lim in that group I'm willing to ignore camel for the greater good.In post 1724, Theta Alpine wrote: i mean
kind of the point of the mass claim was to set out all the roles and see if we can identify any groups of one or groups of four
and also see how many groups we can identify to begin with
we are just waiting on dragoneater to actually claim so that the info cannot get used to craft fake claims
pc
koba
drew
theta
which one is scum?In post 1726, Theta Alpine wrote: this requires an assumption that just having modifiers constitutes a group
that is not exactly the strongest amount of theming plus roles that interact with modifiers specifically exist bringing the total up past fourPC is focusing on what I thought could be a group.
Why they are drilling so deep on it I do not know, especially when I said myself I might not be accurate here(pointed out here by Skygazer here with a modifier).
Not sure your goal here PC
Who said it is a slam dunk?In post 1737, DkKoba wrote: thats 1 aspect of theta's play that is explained by "thats just their perspective", not sure how it is scummy.
that kind of POV is fine and considering it some "slam dunk" reasons is super silly.
because theta has weird playstyle so hurr scummyIn post 1740, Random Nurse wrote: Why are people voting Theta again?
tbh this points towards a pretty easy solution VOTE: drewIn post 1745, Theta Alpine wrote: i mean
ranger casts suspicion on doctor drew
gets doctor drew and cook voting them
i cast suspicion on doctor drew
get doctor drew and cook voting me
it was not exactly difficult to predict
Oh the big bad....horde?In post 1742, Theta Alpine wrote: the horde being drew and cook
