Mini 712 - Capital of the World! - (Game over!)

[TAX]

What dose quasi mean.

[SpyreX]

Real until the series of events is justified. Then it might not be real anymore - mostly me throwing a huge finger at wth just happened without having a full case behind it.

[Porkens]

I'm waiting for him to answer. That last one didn't seem like a joke, and got ma cackles up. My vote is quasi-real.

I eagerly await his answer as well.

...

f&*% it, I can't wait;

1. Do people really read that much into random votes?
2. unvote, porkens
3. One person randomly voting for a person does not lower the odds for another random vote once it has already happened; that is a fallacy.

1. MS seems either worried or offended that his "random" vote was the subject of my post.

over-defensive

2. MS drops his "random" vote and votes for me

OMGUS

3. First of all, I ~kinda~ already addressed this sort of scenario in my previous post;

Now, before you go off with your fists clenched, screaming for my head and holding up signs that say "ALVIN'S VOTE WASN'T RANDOM" and "ALL YOUR MATH SUCKS YOU GIANT DOUCHBAG," realize that even if Alvin's vote wasn't random, the chances that MafiaPlayer is telling the truth (1/11 or 9.1%) are still far lower than the chances that he is scum (25%)!

3 continued.

However,

if both votes are random, I'm fairly sure that math is correct. Although, I can see where it gets confusing:

Amateur-hour math ahead!!!

What MS said was true; the fact that Dice #1 rolls an 11 doesn't change the odds of Dice #2 rolling anything.

But, the probability that

both

dice would randomly role and 11 is, I believe, 1/11*1/11=1/121 (or a about .8%). So, if both of these votes were actually random, this outcome had less than a 1% chance of happening (or; there's more than a 99% chance that someone is lying).

TL;DR

My vote on MafiaPlayer just became serious because:
1. Overly-Defensive
2. OMGUS
3. Dismissing an argument against him as a fallacy when A: The argument did not hinge on the component in question and B: The component in question ~probably~ isn't, in fact, a fallacy.

[Porkens]

Oops: I don't know where I got 'MS' from. I meant 'MP' in the post above.

[SpyreX]

All became fearful of the power that is mathematics. Look it up, dummy.

[Sun Tzu]

I'm leaving my vote on Porkens. This nonsense isn't helping and it's getting old.

[Porkens]

I'm leaving my vote on Porkens. This nonsense isn't helping and it's getting old.

Hahhaa, ok, my bad. I see now that I was muddying the waters with my big posts. Let's get back to the

issues

, guys, and stop all this petty OMGUS. This game has been good, so far, there have been a lot of well-built cases and, man, GOOD scumhunting. Even though the game's just getting started! You know, and I hope this doesn't fall back into the "nonsense" catagory you were refering to, ST, this game has had 56 posts in 6 days (just less than .5 posts per hour)! So I agree with Sun Tzu that it would really be better if we all cut out all the silliness. It just gets in the way of the real game!

[Westbrook_Owns_U]

Yea, I agree with that.

Now anyways, I think that Suntzu was being defensive on this one. Did you notice that he didn't really care until it became an actual problem where MP actual got an OMGUS case against him. I don't know if this has all been just a joke but....

[Netlava]

Vote Count:

Porkens (2) - Sun Tzu, Mafiaplayer
Mafiaplayer (2) - Porkens, SpyreX
super random dude (1) - alvinz95
PerArdua (1) - super random dude
Sun Tzu (1) - TAX

12 Players, 7 to lynch.

[Netlava]

EdwardElric has been prodded.

[Sun Tzu]

Now what?

[Porkens]

...seriously?

[Netlava]

EdwardElric has not picked up his role PM and will be replaced.

[Netlava]

Kuribo replaces Seraphim.

[kuribo]

hey hey hey

[kuribo]

Well, I expected to replace into this game in the random vote stage, because every single time I've random voted someone as town, they've turned out to be scum.

But I see that Porkens and MafiaPlayer have tried to push us quickly out of said stage.

I don't like the fact that Porkens attempted to build a huge case against someone. ON PAGE TWO OF DAY 1.

I don't like that MafiaPlayer thought that the best reaction to this was to vote Porkens, either.

[kuribo]

This game has been good, so far, there have been a lot of well-built cases and, man, GOOD scumhunting. Even though the game's just getting started!

Absolutely false. It's only page three, and this sort of statement reeks of trying to justify a future quicklynch.

[Porkens]

Absolutely false. It's only page three, and this sort of statement reeks of trying to justify a future quicklynch.

My fondest hope is that it's so quick it travels through time and happens yesterday.

[SpyreX]

You have been CAUGHT Porkens

Caught

[Porkens]

F**k.

[SpyreX]

I knoe rite

[TAX]

I'm confused are we in random voting phase or not.

[Soveliss]

Tax you sure do seem to be confused alot.

[Westbrook_Owns_U]

Wow... this is the least serious mafia I've ever been in .

[Netlava]

Super random dude and alvinz95 have been prodded.