I don't get the point of this. I jsut seems like you're saying "yea but scum can do that"In post 348, Skygazer wrote:Plenty of room for a partner in all of that; KKFC's theoretical partner could have just been frozen, bussing, not wanting to be obviously counterwagoning, simply absent, etc. I don't really agree with your gamestate analysis essentially, although I agree KKFC could easily just be scummy looking town. Generally scum don't defend scum that often anyways imo, especially at the point where KKFC was at. With the position KKFC was in me thinks scum would wanna keep their distance which would match the reactions you described.In post 346, Elements wrote:I was never going to hammer you. And there are reactions to look at. E.g. the unvoting from you was quite slow and no one was rushing to your defence.In post 345, KatyKimFanClub wrote: VOTE: Elements
If the idea was to provoke a reaction or a defense, then you should probably have considered the fact that there was already significant pressure on me. Seems like a lazy attempt to get on a wagon with the fallback defense of "reaction farming". Especially after you admit you don't have any reads.
Daisy unvoted which I expected, and then re-voted you.
PP was the first to unvote you, mid conversation. But again, that was very just "I want to finish this chat" and nothing to do with your slot. (Although with my knowledge of PP I wouldn't put it past him to position himself to be able to do that)
So from the reactions to my "intent to hammer" I don't think that your scum partner was either active, or on your wagon around that time. Which is the majority of the player base. Making me think you're probably just town with an easily scumread play style, as you've been saying. Which is something I can empathize with as someone who used to get regularly voted out day two due to play style
VOTE: sky
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
