Mini Normal 2303 [Postgame!!!!]

[Hu Tao]

hu you have posted precious little this game! i get it though, we're all busy

Hello. Looks like you were almost.. Cooked earlier

[KatyKimFanClub]

Hi, sorry, I've been reading and meaning to post but the pace of posts was a lot higher than expected. As for my vote on Cook, I just did it because I know a cook in real life and I don't like them. That was literally it.

[KatyKimFanClub]

There's nothing protown about rushing a wagon to E-2 within like 4 hours of the game starting.

I think early wagons are fine, I think e-2 is really not that big of a deal, and I don't think the wagon is 'rushed' - I like the Cook vote

Genuine question, are we all interacting just to have a corpus of information for later days or is there just disagreement from an optimal play perspective on whether an early bandwagon is good or not. It looks to me like Cook was never in any real danger of getting enough votes to be killed and we should all move on.

VOTE: UNVOTE: Cook

[Cook]

Hi, sorry, I've been reading and meaning to post but the pace of posts was a lot higher than expected. As for my vote on Cook, I just did it because I know a cook in real life and I don't like them. That was literally it.

same here, both counts. all good, man

[Invisibility]

Hi, sorry, I've been reading and meaning to post but the pace of posts was a lot higher than expected. As for my vote on Cook, I just did it because I know a cook in real life and I don't like them. That was literally it.

lol you don't really need to justify rvs

[Invisibility]

btw Katy can you get an avatar? It's easier to remember who made what post for me if you have one lol

[KatyKimFanClub]

btw Katy can you get an avatar? It's easier to remember who made what post for me if you have one lol

This is great advice by the way. I've been trying to remember usernames but avatars is so much better.

[Black]

UNVOTE: Cook
Removing my RVS vote that this one has zero attachment to. Importantly, this one is very curious about how and why this wagon has picked up so fast.

This post is what made me want to look at your posts in more detail because I made this exact post as scum in my second game. I got pushed for it and I argued that it isn't scummy to remove a RVS vote from a growing wagon. It isn't, and I don't think it's scummy here, but it was a funny enough coincidence to make me raise my eyebrow

~~~

There's nothing protown about rushing a wagon to E-2 within like 4 hours of the game starting.

I disagree here. I think you can just look at the discussion the wagon has created and say it's a good idea. I don't think Cook was ever in danger of getting limmed. And it seems like you're suspicious of the wagon, so it has already created leads for you when there otherwise wouldn't have been any

~~~

Wagons are pro-town they aren't being pushed into kill range for literally no reason on the first fucking real-life day of the game. Can you ACTUALLY show me that we got anything out of 5 votes on Cook, a minimum of two of which were RVS and the rest with flimsy reasoning like "vibes"?

Town doesn't E-2 someone when it wants info it E-2s someone when they're a top scumread and people want them dead.

This frustration feels real. Again, I don't agree with your argument fundamentally and I think you should start looking into the wagon instead of saying we've gotten nothing out of it. If you think there's scum on the wagon then look at the 4 Cook votes and push one

~~~

Either way this one is suspect of the wagon getting so far so fast on so little reasoning to vote.

I believe that you believe this. It's evident in 134 that you didn't like the wagon in real time. I feel like there's a natural progression here. You

could

be scum that's poking at quick wagons as an easy target, but I think it's probably safe to call you town for now. I started to think it was weird that you weren't voting for anyone on the wagon but then I remembered Fire & Ice where I had to practically force you to vote, so I don't really think it's scummy for you

[Black]

I like Ausuka's posts so far and I particularly kind of mind melded with these as I was skimming through

I think wagons are protown and the concern feels overblown to me

There's nothing protown about rushing a wagon to E-2 within like 4 hours of the game starting.

I think early wagons are fine, I think e-2 is really not that big of a deal, and I don't think the wagon is 'rushed' - I like the Cook vote

[T3]

Oh wait, no. Kindle is my main choice of communication

I used to play on my kindle paperwhite

we need you to weigh in on the ongoing fire discussion

My fire alarm mistakenly went off at 4 am a few weeks ago so I guess the fire was invisible or something

[T3]

Oh wait people are are actually posting stuff

It’s 1:40 AM

Good night!

[Black]

I do like the Cook wagon but I think there could easily be at least one scum on it. I'm putting HPE and Ausuka on my town side for now. I need to look more at fire's posts but I remember them being mostly fluff (could be wrong, I'm a little drunk)

I like my Invisibility vote atm

[ItalianoVD]

I think wagons are protown and the concern feels overblown to me

There's nothing protown about rushing a wagon to E-2 within like 4 hours of the game starting.

I think early wagons are fine, I think e-2 is really not that big of a deal, and I don't think the wagon is 'rushed' - I like the Cook vote

This

[ItalianoVD]

There's nothing protown about rushing a wagon to E-2 within like 4 hours of the game starting.

It does get things moving at least.

[ItalianoVD]

Either way this one is suspect of the wagon getting so far so fast on so little reasoning to vote.

You must not have played a lot of games because it's a pretty common thing.

[ItalianoVD]

Either way this one is suspect of the wagon getting so far so fast on so little reasoning to vote.

Either way this one is suspect of the wagon getting so far so fast on so little reasoning to vote.

agree with you there. i don't know if it's even an issue, but regardless, i think it's respectable to be offended at a wagon on me when the game's barely started

doubt a townie would have lolhammered anyhow

yah

Either way this one is suspect of the wagon getting so far so fast on so little reasoning to vote.

this is reasonable!

Either way this one is suspect of the wagon getting so far so fast on so little reasoning to vote.

agree with you there. i don't know if it's even an issue, but regardless, i think it's respectable to be offended at a wagon on me when the game's barely started

Yes.

Hmm. Somebody here is scum.

[ItalianoVD]

hu you have posted precious little this game! i get it though, we're all busy

Hello. Looks like you were almost.. Cooked earlier

[ItalianoVD]

Going back to 215. I like HighPrincess and Invisibility for town. It's just a certain townie tone to their posts, especially Invisibility. This leaves Cook and Asri.

For now VOTE: Asri

It's really late here though. I'll have to go more in depth tomorrow. Ciao peeps.

[fireisredsir]

but let's get the ball going on questions.

@fireisredsir

, for 20 posts you've put out very little content. what are your thoughts on the wagon?

i thought your initial reaction to there being votes on you felt off, especially because 2 of them came before you ever posted (and invisibility's seemed like mostly a joke?) so it was weird to call it a wagon that had anything to do with you. your posting seemed a little anxious so i wanted to vote there mostly to pressure a little more and see what the response was

i felt like ausuka was seeing the same things (she poked at it a little earlier, and then joined with a vote and more explanation a little after), so i was happy to see the wagon grow there. really i think mine and hers are the only two meaningful votes, and there's not a lot of point in discussing the rvs ones or considering them as part of a wagon

i didn't really like the immediate response in 139 and 141, felt like more of the kind of anxious not sure how to handle being wagoned type energy that i think is more likely to come from scum

i also kinda think 183 is lacking in critical thinking or in approaching the situation with a real attempt to solve, because there's no reason to include katykim's vote in the group since again, it came before you ever posted

[fireisredsir]

hu tao has posted a total of one word

i feel like the vote is kinda self explanatory

one might say it is not elaboratable

Interesting. So on this site saying hello is scummy and saying a bunch of cringe fake things (not directed at you) in the beginning of the game for 10 pages is towny. I will note this.

i don't think it's particularly scummy

my comment was about finding it strange that italiano seemed to be making a show of not asking ausuka to elaborate, when it seemed to me that it would be obvious what she was thinking

[fireisredsir]

There's nothing protown about rushing a wagon to E-2 within like 4 hours of the game starting.

I think early wagons are fine, I think e-2 is really not that big of a deal, and I don't think the wagon is 'rushed' - I like the Cook vote

Genuine question, are we all interacting just to have a corpus of information for later days or is there just disagreement from an optimal play perspective on whether an early bandwagon is good or not. It looks to me like Cook was never in any real danger of getting enough votes to be killed and we should all move on.

VOTE: UNVOTE: Cook

hi, welcome! you don't need to type VOTE and UNVOTE, you can just use the tags, there's one for [ unvote ]

what do you mean by "we should all move on"?

[Black]

There's nothing protown about rushing a wagon to E-2 within like 4 hours of the game starting.

I think early wagons are fine, I think e-2 is really not that big of a deal, and I don't think the wagon is 'rushed' - I like the Cook vote

Genuine question, are we all interacting just to have a corpus of information for later days or is there just disagreement from an optimal play perspective on whether an early bandwagon is good or not. It looks to me like Cook was never in any real danger of getting enough votes to be killed and we should all move on.

VOTE: UNVOTE: Cook

It's good to talk. And yeah it seems like HPE doesn't think a bandwagon is very good. What do you think about that?

[Cook]

but let's get the ball going on questions.

@fireisredsir

, for 20 posts you've put out very little content. what are your thoughts on the wagon?

i thought your initial reaction to there being votes on you felt off, especially because 2 of them came before you ever posted (and invisibility's seemed like mostly a joke?) so it was weird to call it a wagon that had anything to do with you. your posting seemed a little anxious so i wanted to vote there mostly to pressure a little more and see what the response was

tbh it felt like the game was moving faster than i could react to it and that i had to get a word in edgeways or i was going to get limmed without time to put myself out there or anything. i don't know if i was unfounded in thinking that, but yknow. always a pleasant surprise to start a day with two votes on me, even if random

i felt like ausuka was seeing the same things (she poked at it a little earlier, and then joined with a vote and more explanation a little after), so i was happy to see the wagon grow there. really i think mine and hers are the only two meaningful votes, and there's not a lot of point in discussing the rvs ones or considering them as part of a wagon

okay, okay. i'll ignore them now.

i didn't really like the immediate response in 139 and 141, felt like more of the kind of anxious not sure how to handle being wagoned type energy that i think is more likely to come from scum

pressure, friend. i dunno how to handle it. i feel like i get SR'd for being anxious under pressure. might just be me

i also kinda think 183 is lacking in critical thinking or in approaching the situation with a real attempt to solve, because there's no reason to include katykim's vote in the group since again, it came before you ever posted

you'd think i'd catch things like that but apparently i don't.



well, thanks for your thoughts.

[sheepsaysmeep]

.

[sheepsaysmeep]

.