BooneyToonz XVI: Boons Ahoy! - [END]

[Frogs]

Being superstar fruit vendor is useless enough to be town role.

who would be ur next vote?

[Ranger]

Frogs and Klick aren't scum together, yet still individually can be.

Last night, I had a thought about Klick, and how I've seen his play before and his play here seems irrational and stubborn compared to prior towngames in a way I feel suspect; he is far more tunneled and closed off than is typical of a town game.

This caused a revisit to the above.

Ultimately, I stand by it being most likely true.

I explored the possible worlds where both were scum, and none seemed likely.

In a 3x groupscum + traitor world, there would need to be traitor signaling D1. (Or Frogs is the traitor, knew the scum, and outright told Klick. In this world, a stark contrast in Klick's Frogs read between D1 and D2 is needed. Regardless, the improbability of this should be apparent.)
This would leave a visible trace. While I've not checked to confirm, I expect to find none.

It's possible if scum have no daychat yet the neighborhood does. As daychat's fairly universal, this is unlikely.

It's possible if Frogs can add players to the same neighborhood. Neighborizing scum N1 and town later sets up optics for pocketing the town. I'm under the assumption Frogs' neighborize action doesn’t work this way, leaving this not an option.

It's possible if Frogs is just lying. No neighborhood exists. Aliase lies as scum, but I don’t see how this would provide a tangible benefit.

It's possible if Frogs thought targeting Klick was optimal play, despite the loss of a tool likely designed for targeting town. As this requires scum believing it optimal play, I've doubts.

It's possible if Frogs' action is Loyal. Targeting a scumbuddy would be mandatory. As this requires a specific modifier unlikely to be present, this is rather unlikely. If Frogs did die, Klick would instantly follow.

So for full transparency, it's not impossible

per se

for them to be scum together.

However, I feel the improbability of each scenario makes it likely they aren’t scum together.

I still individually have scumreads on both; one cannot be correct.

Dealing with things today, so can't comment further until about 12 hours from now.

[TemporalLich]

Ranger thinks Klick is scum for some arcane reason...

Yeah I am keeping my vote on Ranger, Ranger is scum

[Enchant]

Arcane reason can't be wrong

[Frogs]

VOTE: ranger

i'll be jailing dragons tonight

[Klick]

OMGUS lmao

[Frogs]

OH MY GUSS!!!!!!!!!

[Frogs]

ribbit

[Enchant]

Let's find out top townread and kill it because it's deep wolf

[Here There Be Dragons]

VOTE: ranger

i'll be jailing dragons tonight

you realize this action loses 100% of its town utility if you announce it right

-c

[Frogs]

CROAK

[Doctor Drew]

Let's find out top townread and kill it because it's deep wolf

Is it only a top townread if Ranger says so?

[Enchant]

Let's find out top townread and kill it because it's deep wolf

Is it only a top townread if Ranger says so?

I don't really consider other ppl opinions, i only have mine

[NorwegianboyEE]

I think i’m starting to lean towards Alisae’s: "just resolve Ranger slot" idea.
I don’t think Klick is scum in this game and neither Frogs so it kinda just feels like Ranger is trying to push wherever and see what sticks.

[NorwegianboyEE]

VOTE: Ranger

[Doctor Drew]

VOTE: Ranger

Is that a lim?

[Firebringer]

Wow calling me town for being dumb with mechanics. That is boring.

I thought i was so town for my first post.

[Firebringer]

how did that post come in here.
THe fuck

[Firebringer]

pretty fine with ranger flip
ranger needs resolution imo
which will help me line up my future elim on Frogs if its town pretty nicely.

[TemporalLich]

VOTE: Ranger

Is that a lim?

E-1 I believe

[Ranger]

flippyNips made one pop-in and activated their Superstar but didn't really do anything of actual substance

Yes. I believe that's +scum for him. I'm notably

not unvoting the slot

.

Don't be surprised if you see people in your townbloc do so

. They shouldn't if they're actually town. I'm still expecting it.

It's almost like the scum don't actually want the scum to die today.

[Ranger]

Ur voting one of those players lol

Yes.
{Ranger, Here There Be Dragons, Emperor flippyNips} contains 0-2 scum, rather than the 2-3 advertised.

I believe it has precisely one, Emperor flippyNips, and placing him last on the lim order and pivoting away from him onto the claimed TPR is +scum.

Not that you're actually interested in listening because why would Ranger ever be right?

I like my odds of being right a lot more than your odds right now.

[Ranger]

You using it as like "ohh yeah look his partner not here" like its actually a point in ur favor is so wrong.

Well it is a point in my favor. I don't recall claiming it a strong one. It's the weakest one in fact.

I wonder why you attack the weakest point I make rather than the strongest?

2) Ali literally pivoted from you to flippy. So the argument that ali only wants to end the day seems rather weak to me.

And pivoted right back on after Emperor flippyNips' role was revealed.

Almost as if scum knew Emperor flippyNips' role already, knew he could reveal it at any time, and knew after revealing it, people would be disincentivized to stay on the wagon, and return to the prior one no questions asked.

[Ranger]

Cause all u do is moonlogic and make up shit

This is the second time I've been accused of moonlogic.


Yet those who say it seem to use it to ignore valid arguments.

[Ranger]

But you’re arguing this in the least helpful.

Arguing?


I don't recall arguing in 2244.

I argue in 2269, 2268, 2267, 2260, 2252, 2250, 2247, 2235, 2147, 2146, 2132, 2130, 2127, 2123, 2120, 2116, 2115, 2086, 2085, 2084, 2082, 2079, 2068, 2065, 2060, first half of 2042, 2032, 1945, 1867, 1861, 1848, 1847, and 1842.

When what will ultimately prove to be fairly correct logic postgame got discarded, I stopped arguing with you.

2242 is snark.

You should learn the difference.