Mini 694 - Office Supplies Mafia [Game Over]

[Porkens]

The last six days of the gap(from the 15th to the 21st) I was V/LA due to a family emergency.

Prior to that, I felt I had commented on what I could and was trying to encourage other players to take the initiative.

You're the only one (that I can recall) who promised to post before the deadline :p

[raider8169]

The last six days of the gap(from the 15th to the 21st) I was V/LA due to a family emergency.

Prior to that, I felt I had commented on what I could and was trying to encourage other players to take the initiative.

You're the only one (that I can recall) who promised to post before the deadline :p

Fair enough, I was not trying to pry in your personal life. Sorry if it felt that way.

You right I was, only I was hoping more people would post this close to a deadline. I failed to find anything worth pursuing during my quick review of the main 3 players.

[Moratorium]

vote: Porkens

Nothing has been said that has helped me understand the Day 1 voting behavior.

[raider8169]

vote: Porkens

Nothing has been said that has helped me understand the Day 1 voting behavior.

When did you ever try to understand the Day 1 voting? You have not said anything about Porkens all game. You have not asked any questions about the voting. Your vote seems like total crap and it seems like you just want to get Porkens lynched for no real reasons. A better care on Porkens will get my vote removed but as you only post once very couple of days I do not see this happening before the deadline.

Vote Moratorium

[Moratorium]

I feel that the wagon on salem_pc has been, and I'll quote myself as you indicate that I haven't said anything about this:

...weak (OMGUS) and feels scum driven. I'd like to see that votecount, but right now I'm more suspicious of anyone joining the salem bandwagon than anyone else at the moment.

In this particular case, you, raider, are actually the player that voted first. But I'm not voting for you because it is plausible (and as it happens, my belief) that you are just voting for a crappy reason that you actually believe in. But the players that jumped on behind you (in this case, and here I'll type their names out explicitly for you for the first time since apparently you need your hand held, qwints and Porkens), to me, are doing so because they are taking advantage of your proposition and trying to freeroll into the next day.

[qwints]

Just because I didn't vote first doesn't change the fact that I've thought salem_pc was scum from day 1. Accusing me of bandwagoning just doesn't hold water.

[Porkens]

Raider, putting a single vote on Moratorium without even a case to back it at deadline is absolutely worthless. Unless you want to get other people to join you, it's just a "safe" place to stick your vote.

I still like Moratoriums posts, even if they are against me.

LG has done a fair job replacing into a slot that's been tainted by really bad play.

I don't like qwints' backpedling on wagoning salem_pc. His last post, especially irks me.

unvote

vote: qwints

[raider8169]

I feel that the wagon on salem_pc has been, and I'll quote myself as you indicate that I haven't said anything about this:

...weak (OMGUS) and feels scum driven. I'd like to see that votecount, but right now I'm more suspicious of anyone joining the salem bandwagon than anyone else at the moment.

In this particular case, you, raider, are actually the player that voted first. But I'm not voting for you because it is plausible (and as it happens, my belief) that you are just voting for a crappy reason that you actually believe in. But the players that jumped on behind you (in this case, and here I'll type their names out explicitly for you for the first time since apparently you need your hand held, qwints and Porkens), to me, are doing so because they are taking advantage of your proposition and trying to freeroll into the next day.

I dont have time to look back but are you refering to when I voted, then realized I mis understood what was said and then unvoted before anyone else voted?

[pacman281292]

Just because I didn't vote first doesn't change the fact that I've thought salem_pc was scum from day 1. Accusing me of bandwagoning just doesn't hold water.

does not compute *explodes*
What in hell are you talking about? WHO SAID THAT?!

[Porkens]

Just because I didn't vote first doesn't change the fact that I've thought salem_pc was scum from day 1. Accusing me of bandwagoning just doesn't hold water.

does not compute *explodes*
What in hell are you talking about? WHO SAID THAT?!

Haha

QFT

You phrased this much better than I did!

[Moratorium]

/stare pacman281292
/stare Porkens

...

Re-read post 279 please.

...

Also, I just PM'd the mod for a one-week extension, because while you're all having a retarded cock-slapping fight, today is deadline and we're about to

No Lynch

. Rules for this game require a simple majority. I get complaints about not posting a lot, but none of YOU ARE PAYING ANY GOD DAMN ATTENTION.

[SensFan]

I will need a PM from a majority of players to grant an extension. Otherwise, day ends at midnight EST tonight (7 hours from now) as planned.

[Moratorium]

Unofficial Vote Count

Porkens (3) - Stef, Gurgi, Moratorium
Salempc/Gurgi (2) - qwints, ZONEACE
Moratorium (1) - raider8169
qwints (1) - Porkens

No vote: Nobody I think. Not 100% sure what our actual player list is.

Also, not sure if anyone has noticed, but both Green Crayons and Sudo_Nym are listed as both alive and dead on Page 1. And a few players (Vamparific, salempc) need to be replaced on the alive list.

Also interesting, Porkens, if there was actually a rule in place where you only needed a plurality of votes to lynch at deadline instead of a majority, you would have effectively lynched yourself by unvoting Gurgi and voting qwints, which gave you the lead in votes.

And finally, if it turns out that SensFan actually meant to say "Plurality" instead of "Majority" in the rules, the rules are a mess of confusion.

[SensFan]

Porkens - 3 (Stef, Gurgi, Moratorium)
Salempc - 1 (ZONEACE)
Gurgi - 1 (qwints)
Moratorium - 1 (raider)
qwints - 1 (Porkens)

Not Voting - 2 (crywolf20084, pacman281292)

[Moratorium]

After getting all pissed, I went back and re-read the rules a few more times, and I'll be honest, I'm back to not being sure how this works.

Can someone tell me whether this game automatically No Lynches if we don't hammer by deadline, or whether the person with the most votes is lynched if we don't hammer by deadline.

I can't tell based on rules 3, 4 and 5 and the wording of it.

[crywolf20084]

[05] Days will last 3 weeks long max. You have one (1) extension of 1 week. If you want the extension: PM me. If I impose a day deadline the player with the most votes will be lynched (this includes no lynch). In case of a tie, first come, first served. In case of an endgame (six players or fewer) only simply majority lynches will occur.

>.> I really don't know.. *asking mod*

[SensFan]

[05] Days will last 3 weeks long max. You have one (1) extension of 1 week. If you want the extension: PM me.

If I impose a day deadline the player with the most votes will be lynched (this includes no lynch). In case of a tie, first come, first served.

In case of an endgame (six players or fewer) only simply majority lynches will occur.

Seems very clear to me. Whoever has the most votes will be lynched. If tied, whoever gets there first will be lynched.

[Porkens]

Get's

where

first is the part I don't understand.

E Gads, your right. However, id rather lynch qwints than LG, based on my post above, so if no one is interested in doing that (and ill be sad) ill switch back,

[SensFan]

Get's

where

first is the part I don't understand.

Ummm...gets to that number of votes.

[Porkens]

Ok, let me throw a hypothetical out there;

During the day; I accumulated 3 votes against me.
At the very last second of the day, 3 people vote for Qwints.
So, at the deadline; its 3 for me, 3 for qwints.
What happens?

(will people continue to vote or will I be lynched because I, earlier in the day, had 3 votes first?)

[Lord Gurgi]

Crywolf, Pacman: Vote for

someone

.

[qwints]

In the interest of insuring a lynch and due to Porken's recent obliviousness...

unvote, vote Porkens

[Lord Gurgi]

Late bussing, admirable try considering the rules.

[Porkens]

Just because I didn't vote first doesn't change the fact that I've thought salem_pc was scum from day 1. Accusing me of bandwagoning just doesn't hold water.

does not compute *explodes*
What in hell are you talking about? WHO SAID THAT?!

Haha

QFT

You phrased this much better than I did!

Sorry, I was posting from work, and didn't quite compute what pacman actually said. I read it as "Of COURSE accusing you of bandwagoning makes sense" not "who accused you of bandwagoning?"

Reading it again, I don't know how I made the mistake.

[Porkens]

Crywolf and Pacman need to commit to a vote.