So you think that the player who contributes very little is not to blame for being scumread?In post 778, Hu Tao wrote: Policy is a dumb term for laziness and people who don't want consequences for their actions if they turn out wrong. It's an ego protector. If they are wrong they can just day "oh well its their fault for playing that way"
In post 877, curiouskarmadog wrote: also going to
UNVOTE
for now.
reading this gist, makes me think Bub is scum, but not sure if that is my read or just a defensive reaction to him being on my wagon.
Ill vote tomorrow. and provide my current SRs.
hmm karma dog's last 2 posts... so karma dog claims pr cause "won't be here at deadline" well it's now tuesday, 2 days after that deadline, you've been here and haven't done muchIn post 958, curiouskarmadog wrote:MOD: is there anyway on the first page you can show WHO replaced WHO?
like, no thoughts after lightly skimming? there was an ENTIRE conversation directly after the claim, I feel like town!karma dog would at least have some comment from that conversation...In post 875, curiouskarmadog wrote: not done, lightly skimming to get the gist, then will go back and do a deeper dive tomorrow. After the two initial serious wagons everything else have felt like the "tipping my toe in to see how it feels or what others think about it" pop up wagons. a swell of a couple votes, no real reason. thats kind of day one I guess.
In post 908, Hu Tao wrote:Hu Tao (4):KawaiiKame, Save The Dragons, Bub Bidderskins, ballpointpen
Save the Dragon: pops in every now and then saying he wants to kill someone
In post 923, Save The Dragons wrote: i want to kill someone
These are the type of people on my wagon btw. I think ballpoint is the only one who gave an actual reasonIn post 924, Save The Dragons wrote: cephrir is probably town here guys
greeting too
njac is probably town tho despite having bad takes
hu tao is ???
let's kill hu tao
Well this is a lie. I have been posting and replying to people and giving reads. You're just tunnel visioned or purposely avoiding this. You can't day that my content this week and last week is the sameIn post 928, Bub Bidderskins wrote:I have been constantly re-evaluating. Remember I originally pegged you as town after the BS wagon I started on you. But your pattern of activity has looked really scummy since then. Namely -- lurking and not contributing until significant pressure builds and then flailing around aimlessly only in the service of self-preservation. Your posting pattern and content hasn't changed -- why should my scum read of you change?In post 908, Hu Tao wrote:
Bub: saying the same thing about the wagon for days without reevaluating even with no deadline (kinda sussy even though I townread them currently)
You realize there is NO DEADLINE AT THE MOMENT. You can push WHOEVER. What are your ACTUAL reads. Stop giving EXCUSESIn post 949, Cephrir wrote: hey here's a wild idea what if i'm just right and all these wagons are on town. what am i supposed to do? im voting hu tao only because i think the other wagons are even worse
i can't interest anyone in enchant. malcolm is widely townread for some mysterious reason, we tried skygazer already (and wouldn't you know it, they've gone back to lurking), i don't have any reason for kittytacky they're just not being useful, and that's pretty much everyone i feel like voting. no one is going to vote any of these people with me if i don't have a better reason than "vibes," but i don't
i get offended when i draw suspicion that amounts to "i think you're such a bad scum player that you can't fake any reads" or whatever because i'm actually a very good scum player and perhaps you'll notice i've been on this website for 17 goddamn years surely i learned how to fake a read at some point
I hope this isn't about cephrirIn post 950, Save The Dragons wrote: Like he's genuinely trying tho
No I think it's up to the person to not just use that as an excuse for voting themIn post 956, Greeting wrote:So you think that the player who contributes very little is not to blame for being scumread?In post 778, Hu Tao wrote: Policy is a dumb term for laziness and people who don't want consequences for their actions if they turn out wrong. It's an ego protector. If they are wrong they can just day "oh well its their fault for playing that way"
What about curious?In post 965, Save The Dragons wrote: Is anyone up for a glitch/enchant wagon
