the thing with what youre doing is that some people haven't posted and some people are minimally active so it's a little silly to be mad at someone for messing around at this stage of the game
like there isn't really much to talk about on page two unless someone does something horrendously scummy/towny
Eh I don't think it's a bad thing to use the content you have and to expect other people to also do that, extending the phase of "there's nothing to talk about" beyond the first few posts makes for a more boring game I reckon. There's plenty to discuss and form opinions on already.
In post 75, Deltabreedy wrote:
Considering 2 people haven't posted yet, I'm waiting until we hear from the remaining slots before I start plopping together a coalition.
This was not the response I hoped for! Though I'm also eager to hear from KawaiiKame and N_M, whenever they have the time to make their entrances.
You're under no obligation to be the same person you were 5 minutes ago.
Usually. The implication being that we're not in RVS at the moment.
What point are you trying to argue here? Do you think we should stay stagnant and stop posting and just let the day go on? Why are you planting the flag and dying on this hill?
Ninja'd by Key:
I think when we eventually get contributions from them, reading into the wider game and associatives gives me a better chance of putting together a town-only coalition and winning us the game. I'm much more comfortable with using my vote than with trying to build a coalition to generate and develop my reads in the meantime.
You need bricks to build a house, we're currently missing two bricks.
Refer to me as 'Delta' or 'Tom'. Cheers! |
'Black, if you're scum, I'll eat my shoe.'
Never forget
Regular V/LA Wednesday evenings and Thursday all day (UTC+1)
delta.... that's not what i'm saying?? im not sure how you're taking it that way. i feel like your vote on nsg feels like a stretch, and it's based on "not contributing" when they have in fact been taking part in discussion and the stupid psychic thing, when it's pretty normal to make jokes earlygame.
In post 83, patchwork wrote:
delta.... that's not what i'm saying?? im not sure how you're taking it that way. i feel like your vote on nsg feels like a stretch, and it's based on "not contributing" when they have in fact been taking part in discussion and the stupid psychic thing, when it's pretty normal to make jokes earlygame.
In post 84, patchwork wrote:
anyways policy tr for delta i'll probably revoke this later but he's just been generally towny so i might not
This is a pretty towny progression on patch's part, I think.
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
In post 83, patchwork wrote:
delta.... that's not what i'm saying?? im not sure how you're taking it that way. i feel like your vote on nsg feels like a stretch, and it's based on "not contributing" when they have in fact been taking part in discussion and
the stupid psychic thing
, when it's pretty normal to make jokes earlygame.
In post 83, patchwork wrote:
delta.... that's not what i'm saying?? im not sure how you're taking it that way. i feel like your vote on nsg feels like a stretch, and it's based on "not contributing" when they have in fact been taking part in discussion and
the stupid psychic thing
, when it's pretty normal to make jokes earlygame.
In post 82, Deltabreedy wrote:
I think when we eventually get contributions from them, reading into the wider game and associatives gives me a better chance of putting together a town-only coalition and winning us the game. I'm much more comfortable with using my vote than with trying to build a coalition to generate and develop my reads in the meantime.
I'm so flipflop on Delta... only having scumreads does come across as paranoid town, maybe picking to push people that are confusing is a NAI playstyle.
In post 83, patchwork wrote:
delta.... that's not what i'm saying?? im not sure how you're taking it that way. i feel like your vote on nsg feels like a stretch, and it's based on "not contributing" when they have in fact been taking part in discussion and the stupid psychic thing, when it's pretty normal to make jokes earlygame.
In post 84, patchwork wrote:
anyways policy tr for delta i'll probably revoke this later but he's just been generally towny so i might not
This is a pretty towny progression on patch's part, I think.
What progression?
You're under no obligation to be the same person you were 5 minutes ago.
In post 83, patchwork wrote:
delta.... that's not what i'm saying?? im not sure how you're taking it that way. i feel like your vote on nsg feels like a stretch, and it's based on "not contributing" when they have in fact been taking part in discussion and the stupid psychic thing, when it's pretty normal to make jokes earlygame.
In post 84, patchwork wrote:
anyways policy tr for delta i'll probably revoke this later but he's just been generally towny so i might not
This is a pretty towny progression on patch's part, I think.
What progression?
Arguing a bunch with Delta and saying his arguments against NSG make no sense, and then saying he's town. It seems like Patch is just giving their thoughts instead of trying to push some specific position or idea.
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
In post 93, Umlaut wrote:
Arguing a bunch with Delta and saying his arguments against NSG make no sense, and then saying he's town. It seems like Patch is just giving their thoughts instead of trying to push some specific position or idea.
actually it could be seen as inconsistency from scum so it's not specifically towny on my part but you're right that it was me just stringing my thoughts together
In post 82, Deltabreedy wrote:
I think when we eventually get contributions from them, reading into the wider game and associatives gives me a better chance of putting together a town-only coalition and winning us the game. I'm much more comfortable with using my vote than with trying to build a coalition to generate and develop my reads in the meantime.
Town mindset HEAL: Deltabreedy
In post 94, KawaiiKame wrote:
HEAL: Deltabreedy,Duunstral,Keychain,northsidegal,Umlaut
These posts as a total contribution so far from someone who (from a skim through their completed games) often posts multiple times over the course of a few minutes and asks a lot of questions is the shadiest thing I've seen this game, and picking the most popular coalition (Dunn's one, which is the same as Umlaut's and mine plus Delta) without even putting themself in it makes me want to throw out my whole coalition for having Kawaii's scum buddy in it
In post 93, Umlaut wrote:
Arguing a bunch with Delta and saying his arguments against NSG make no sense, and then saying he's town. It seems like Patch is just giving their thoughts instead of trying to push some specific position or idea.
I guess I don't find this particularly AI personally - it could also be that Delta is one of the players patch is familiar with here so it's easier to engage with him over his arguments but separately from whatever read they end up with.
You're under no obligation to be the same person you were 5 minutes ago.
