No, I don't.In post 119, Kowahbunga wrote:To answer you question from 91 - you know my alignment.In post 117, Greeting wrote:Why haven't you answered my question?In post 112, Kowahbunga wrote: Lets put Greeting in the machine. More votes to do that, please.
What aboutIn post 139, NJAC wrote:I liked his response to the pressure.In post 92, Greeting wrote:Why?In post 78, NJAC wrote: I think Hu Tao can go to my town pile.
@Hu Tao: what's your experience with Mafia games?
Bub explained it better in 118.
This also answers Hu Tao's 109.
seems really premature to meIn post 154, Kowahbunga wrote: I'm fine if we push this slot to a claim.
Pretty sure you and Bub are both town.
Well you should. They literally slipped and called me town which is impossible for any town player to know on D1. Its not, however, impossible for scum to know on D1.In post 165, KittyTacky wrote: I don't like Kowah's push on Greeting.
You should ISO them.In post 162, KawaiiKame wrote: 7 pages, not giving us a lot of hope, why is curious being pushed?
I dont see why it is? Whats the point of this wagon if not to lim them or get information out of them that makes us not want to lim them?In post 160, Cephrir wrote:seems really premature to meIn post 154, Kowahbunga wrote: I'm fine if we push this slot to a claim.
In post 163, KittyTacky wrote:Pretty sure you and Bub are both town.
How do you go from “pretty sure” to “tenuous”? In the span of 2 posts?In post 164, KittyTacky wrote: Though my read on you is... tenuous af and is basically null.
????In post 166, Kowahbunga wrote:Well you should. They literally slipped and called me town which is impossible for any town player to know on D1. Its not, however, impossible for scum to know on D1.In post 165, KittyTacky wrote: I don't like Kowah's push on Greeting.
I reskimmed since then and now I'm not really feeling it.In post 169, Kowahbunga wrote:In post 163, KittyTacky wrote:Pretty sure you and Bub are both town.How do you go from “pretty sure” to “tenuous”? In the span of 2 posts?In post 164, KittyTacky wrote: Though my read on you is... tenuous af and is basically null.
This reply doesn't particularly make me feel any better about you being town. Again it's very cagey - I'm not saying you're saying nothing at all, my claim is I feel you've been cagey and are trying to look busier than you are in reality and posts like this look like you're trying to put across a viewpoint or defend your playstyle without saying much at all.In post 106, ballpointpen wrote:saying less is better than saying moreIn post 105, MalcolmTucker wrote: Ballpoint feels scummiest to me so far on gut instinct alone, feel like they're picking/probing at a lot of things in a way that makes them look busy and inquisitive but without there being much substance beyond that. There's a caginess to their play but also a desire to look busy and active that isn't chiming with me so far.
Hu Tao feels a little bit scummy too.
ive learned quite a bit from my interactions, but the better question is whether you have as well, and what you want to do with that information
On Glitch, I'm getting a bit more of a townread from those posts. Aware everyone is different but from my own POV I feel like I'd maybe be less likely to admit to not having that many reads/talk about post count if I'm scum. Need to see more from the slot before getting a firmer read though and have no meta on them at all.In post 120, Bub Bidderskins wrote:Glitch
This sequence of posts feels scummy to me. Twice posting about the idea of creating content without actually creating content. I'm gonna give him some benefit of the doubt on the last post because people have lives, but that's two posts over the course of nearly two full days promising the idea of furthering scumhunting without actually doing anything.
In post 54, Glitch wrote:Mod: Vote count is incorrect, this is my first post and as such I have not voted yet. Thanks for modding a large. That’s a big task to take on but I love a good large so thanks for the work you’re putting in.
Hello all. Been two years since I played but I’m excited to be back. I saw a few others are back from hiatus as well. I imagine some of us are back cause of the newsletter. I know I am. Cool deal.
Lots of talk about RVS and how useful/useless it is so far. Let’s railroad someone and see what happens from there. Maybe some actual content will start.
VOTE: Hu TaoIn post 93, Glitch wrote:Actual content sure. Noteworthy and AI, on page 3 not really.In post 55, ballpointpen wrote:you don't think there's anything of note in the last 3 pages?In post 54, Glitch wrote: Lots of talk about RVS and how useful/useless it is so far. Let’s railroad someone and see what happens from there. Maybe some actual content will start.
VOTE: Hu Tao
I will say I’m so glad there’s not 406 pages to read between signing on. My last large I could barely keep up.
Going in to work but I’ll be back with a few thoughts after my work day. VOTE: Unvote
Damn it's nearly been a full year since that huge Multiball which went on forever.In post 134, Flavor Leaf wrote:It's been just under a year since my last game, and really only played two games ish last year, so fun to see this for sure. I'm going to try to keep a limited pace.In post 54, Glitch wrote: Hello all. Been two years since I played but I’m excited to be back. I saw a few others are back from hiatus as well. I imagine some of us are back cause of the newsletter. I know I am. Cool deal.
Lots of talk about RVS and how useful/useless it is so far.
I have one tinfoil 'hmm, this might be coming from scum' ping so far, but it's just a feeling, but I don't think I'm ready to share who I think it is quite yet.
