Where does it not make sense, it's easy to say it stinks and that it is dumb conjencture. Sure, it's your right. Go ahead and chase after setup slipups which could be perceived as contextual slip ups (more below).Wall-E wrote:Milk said: - my request of replying to the sk theory
I said: You can't force me to join you in shitty conjecture.
Milk said: I didn't say join. I asked for your opinion on the case and suggestions. Surely, it can't be that hard to do?
I said: Ok: Here's my opinion: Your idea is dumb conjecture. I suggest you start scumhunting.
He did not say it was in a hypothetical situation, true, but to be fair to him as well, we were talking about possible power roles and their influences on the sk/vig kill. To deduce from this that by not mentioning "hypothetically speaking" that he is scum with an RB in there, is a bit overboard imo.Wall-E wrote:I said: We're saying the same thing. Tony's language made it clear he believes there is a blocker for NO REASON. If he'd said "Kill the vig" rather than block I wouldn't have a problem. Are you playing dumb? I'm not trying to prove there is no blocker, I'm calling Tony out as scum.
Provide us with specific information please. I'm interested in your opinion.corporate wrote:i think the mobs trying to lynch me today so they dont have to look suspicious at night. im onto you atlas and wall e and you guys dont like it. "YOU HAVE BACKED DOWN" in my opinion alot in the past pages. or maybe you just came on strong in the first few. but now with the thread explosion i think you tow are acting shakey.
I'm reconsidering...Ok, assuming there is an RB, leading this from the "slip up of tony" (lol), do you still stand by your plan of leading the sk/vig?
Most of my suspicion on you is drawn from random unexplained accusations that try to make me look bad, like claiming that you called out (WHERE did you do this? specific quote please) and that I backed down afterwards; WHERE have I done this? "Alot in the past pages" doesn't make any sense. The only reason. Please quote every post of mines that has "backed down" on whatever you are talking about. If you want me and Wall-E lynched so badly you should give the town a reason to, with evidence.corporate wrote:i think the mobs trying to lynch me today so they dont have to look suspicious at night. im onto you atlas and wall e and you guys dont like it. "YOU HAVE BACKED DOWN" in my opinion alot in the past pages. or maybe you just came on strong in the first few. but now with the thread explosion i think you tow are acting shakey.
and wall e im not buddying up to anyone, but i think his actions are more pro town then yours getting on someones case for looking out for us.
after this your posting eased up.corporate wrote:atlas, i know our objective is to find scum, but it feels like you jump on every little thing. maybe im over reacting but it just seems like youre pickyness comes across as over compensating.
maybe im just naive and believe too many people. you could just be a overly helpful townie. but i dunno....
FoS atlas
for making me feel like he is keeping attention off of himself by putting it everywhere else.
Me too.My Milked Eek wrote:Provide us with specific information please. I'm interested in your opinion.corporate wrote:i think the mobs trying to lynch me today so they dont have to look suspicious at night. im onto you atlas and wall e and you guys dont like it. "YOU HAVE BACKED DOWN" in my opinion alot in the past pages. or maybe you just came on strong in the first few. but now with the thread explosion i think you tow are acting shakey.
Really? He's building a case on you (he claims) as we speak! Why are you pushing this garbage around? It makes me feel you're trying to look dumb or too scummy to be scum.corporate wrote:after this your posting eased up.corporate wrote:atlas, i know our objective is to find scum, but it feels like you jump on every little thing. maybe im over reacting but it just seems like youre pickyness comes across as over compensating.
maybe im just naive and believe too many people. you could just be a overly helpful townie. but i dunno....
FoS atlas
for making me feel like he is keeping attention off of himself by putting it everywhere else.
This is utter rubbish.corporate wrote:after this your posting eased up.corporate wrote:atlas, i know our objective is to find scum, but it feels like you jump on every little thing. maybe im over reacting but it just seems like youre pickyness comes across as over compensating.
maybe im just naive and believe too many people. you could just be a overly helpful townie. but i dunno....
FoS atlas
for making me feel like he is keeping attention off of himself by putting it everywhere else.
We got you now, you lurkerscum!Atlas wrote:You claim that I backed off of you because my posting decreased for less than 24 hours!?
Ugh. You really know how to find a way of twistingcorporate wrote:its convienent that when the attention was on wall e, you guys immediatley threw it onto me.
) are scummy, devoid of any valid/likely explanations. You are either scum or a very paranoid townie and I doubt the latter.
So do you, post 136 was a good start, but you haven't been around too much.JordanA24 wrote:zachattack wrote:
While I'm pissing people off questioning their activity, on page 2 a lot of suspicion was being placed on jersey, up until Gammas vig claim. Since Gamma's claimed vig, he's only posted twice.
QFT, jersey needs to speak up more.
You have zero case against me.Budja wrote:OK, my 2 cents.
Wall-E and corporate are clearly the most suspicious (aside from gamma).
I know I am repeating the general opinion of the town here but these are my views and I will explain them
Provably wrong.Budja wrote:First, Wall-E's blatent refusal to listen to anyone elses ideas
You have not been reading my posts. I have said exactly why, but I'll REPEAT myself now.Budja wrote:and disregarding MME's serial killer theory without real reason
I've also addressed this, but I don't care to keep my friends awake typing an angry rejoinder, plus it's hard to fake, so if you feel I'm lying, I'll quote myself. Maybe.Budja wrote:makes him scummy in my book. All of his replys are basically attacks or invalid defence. Why can't the mafia have a roleblocker? , why can't Gamma be a SK?, your posts fails to explain this and simply denounced it without any logic.
Right. I called mad attention to myself so I could throw it all on you. Or maybe you'd like to defend against my specific attacks rather than imagining ones.corporate wrote:its convienent that when the attention was on wall e, you guys immediatley threw it onto me.
Budja wrote:Wall-E and corporate are clearly the most suspicious (aside from gamma).
Ok, so that's wrong, we've established.Budja wrote:First, Wall-E's blatent refusal to listen to anyone elses ideas
I did list a reason. Twice. I'm really proud of one of the posts in which I did it. See if you can guess which one. Seriously, try to guess!Budja wrote:and disregarding MME's serial killer theory without real reason makes him scummy in my book.
Hypocrisy here!Budja wrote:All of his replys are basically attacks or invalid defence.
Budja wrote:Why can't the mafia have a roleblocker? , why can't Gamma be a SK?, your posts fails to explain this and simply denounced it without any logic.
Fos Wall-E
This kind of dismissing things without real reason (its dumb conjecture is not really a logical reason) makes no sense to me.Wall-E wrote: Milk said: - my request of replying to the sk theory
I said: You can't force me to join you in shitty conjecture.
Milk said: I didn't say join. I asked for your opinion on the case and suggestions. Surely, it can't be that hard to do?
I said: Ok: Here's my opinion: Your idea is dumb conjecture. I suggest you start scumhunting.
, denial means nothing without actual evidence to back it up.