Umm...Tolmides, don't you even READ the thread? zach voted for Nekka on the SAME PAGE you were posting on...Cmon now, get with the program...Tolmides wrote:Well zach, I'm focusing on the ones who are voting for Gamma for now, and you three are the ones who've voted for him.
Hrm...lets see, if I'm Gamma do I:Tolmides wrote: Okay then, let's test this number 2 theory:
Gamma: Will you or will you not kill the town's number two target every night? If you won't, then I will support your lynching.
My apologies. I looked at the top of the screen, saw the vote count and that you were the only one voting for Gamma. Then I scrolled down to see who else had voted for him, and missed your unvoting.zachattack wrote:I'm voting for Nekka...
. Tolmides's action wasn't particually scummy.
i don't like following the town around like a little dog.Tolmides wrote:Well zach, I'm focusing on the ones who are voting for Gamma for now, and you three are the ones who've voted for him. I've already voiced my suspicions of Nekka in previous posts, so don't think I'm letting him off scot free.
Okay then, let's test this number 2 theory:
Gamma: Will you or will you not kill the town's number two target every night? If you won't, then I will support your lynching.
Cute.Wall-E wrote:watch out guys milk will give you a +1 if you say things he doesn't like
>_>Wall-E wrote:Dear Milk:
Let's talk. I know we've been distant these past few days, but I feel a budding friendship here.
Shall we?
But there lies your mistake. Knowing what omgus is, is knowing what is not his motive. Go back.Wall-E wrote:Knowing what it means doesn't mean his motive wasn't it. Trying to blind us with science? Try again.
So, it is you, now, who knows what drives our friend?Wall-E wrote:In this case, I think it was. I noticed you ignored my hypothetical while instituting several of your own. That's hypocrisy.
Do you think he would have said what he did had I never typed his name? I vote no, my gut does too, and so I dub it OMGUS. You can kick and scream all day, not changing my mind.
No, not QED omgus.Wall-E wrote:He doesn't like me because I took the opposite stance from him on Gamma's claim. Voting me without saying why what I did is scummy is scummy, because it's stupid. Stupid logic, based on feelings of OMGUS and not sound thinking. QED: OMGUS.
Cute.Wall-E wrote:So to keep your poor widdle bwain from asploding we should kill him.
Uh, no.
I've not attempted to prove a thing either, but that's what you're insinuating here. Your recent posts seem to consist only out of subtle insinuations towards me, while they are truly not true.Wall-E wrote:I've proved nothing. I'm supposing. That's how we play this game!
Oh dawg, u so funneh.Wall-E wrote:You're the one complicating things for no reason.
...You know what? You're right, let's kill the provable and controllable killer because there's probably a doc.
You were drunk, but not drunk enough so that you could check for power roles...Gamma wrote:Those variables are a risk i had to consider when i spit out my role.
Screaming that you're town isn't really good play.Gamma wrote:And so do I.
Except you're killing townie.
You're doin it wrong.
Nope, nothing at all about windwoods. It mentions brass players and that we need to remove them from the orchestra to win. Just double-checked.zach wrote:Eek, does your role PM say anything about woodwinds? You've stated your win condition is to get rid of the brass instruments, but does your PM indicate that the town is specifically woodwind, or just that the brass are mafia?
It pains you to say it?Gamma wrote:i don't like following the town around like a little dog.
But this is apparently the easiest way to get the town to believe me, unless I get roleblocked.
It pains me to say it, but I will.
Terrible terrible suggestion, if we did this, scum could deduce who has power roles and such.Gamma wrote:what instrument does everyone play, anyway?
(hoping this isn't a mod-kill trigger; just curious. If Clarinet is nekka-lucifer, then somebody's probably flute, etc.)
Anybody who protects the proposed victim/roleblocks Gamma etc would be stupid. I doubt any even remotely sane power role wouldn't do that.My Milked Eek wrote:Where's the involvement of other power roles? Doctors? Roleblockers? The possibility of the victims of the vig and the scum being the same? The scum not sending in a kill? Why is he still alive on D2? Why wasn't he roleblocked? Etc... Etc... (all hypothetical)
QFT, jersey needs to speak up more.zachattack wrote:While I'm pissing people off questioning their activity, on page 2 a lot of suspicion was being placed on jersey, up until Gammas vig claim. Since Gamma's claimed vig, he's only posted twice.
How can he pose a threat to the town if we direct him? You're not really contributing anything, and you said the classic scum saying "for now", so that if this bandwagon grinds to a halt, you can just take your vote off freely.jerseygoomba wrote:OK zach, what was so wishy washy about it? I pointed out that I don't think we can trust Gamma to do the right thing by the town. (I agree with Budja that SK actually makes sense with his stance). I'm not convinced that he is mafia but he poses just as much of a threat as the mafia does. So for now, I'm gonna join Budja and
vote Gamma
WHAT??? You can't ignore a case just because you think it's silly...corporate wrote:i agree we keep gamma alive. i like having a vig on our side.
and wall e? your case is week. infact its a blatant lie. i didnt vote atlas for anything. i fosed him, just as well as i can fos anyone. its my job to be suspicious of everyone and look out for the town.
fuck me sideways if i dont play how you would like me to. and if there is a omgus here its from atlas for voting me after i fosed him. then instead of him pushing my pressure youre doing it now.
as for your #44 atlas, i ignored it cuz i think its just plain silly. you have your opinions. i have mine. i dont feel like arguing for pages over something thats not vital.
An odd post since corporate was the first post.Wall-E wrote:Vote: Atlas
Same reason as post 6.
mild agreementjerseygoomba wrote:Tolmides wrote: I'm keeping my vote on jersey for now, his comment about Wall-E bandwagonning read like wilful misrepresentation.Fixed the tags
Definitely not willful misrepresentation. I'm just pointing out that even though Atlas had multiple votes rather quickly, it was Wall-E that cast the second vote. I found it interesting that his random vote landed at Atlas' feet so quickly.
NEver really explained why you are such a fan. It does however make snse if you are Scum, and are hoping that when and if Gamma buys it you can go "see i told you". Only scum would be so SURE another player is town.Wall-E wrote:I'm a Gamma fan already.
jumps on nekka for asking hy the allegiance. says it is "provable" puts the flawed number 2 argument in play....why flawed?Wall-E wrote:Nekka-Lucifer wrote:What OMGUS attack?Wall-E wrote:Nekka-Lucifer's OMGUS attack is noted.Nekka-Lucifer wrote:UnvoteandVote: WallyThat's not a question. It's bad grammar. If you're wondering why I don't find Gamma's claim suspicious, it's because his wagon was suspicious. He acted quite appropriately, in my opinion, in the face of a wagon on him for his random vote (wtf people?). His claim is provable, and if he ever crosses my scumdar it will be a snap to get the momentum to lynch him.Nekka wrote:I was wondering why you're on Gamma's side and not find him suspicious?
Nope. Avoided would be if I was asked a question and didn't answer. You seem eager to spread blame and suspicion. I've noticed you called four people scum since the game began. Are we to assume you're A) really good at this game or B) to be largely ignored?Nekka wrote:I want some reasoning behind it and I feel you avoided this.
while i may have jumped the gun on voting gamma. how exactly is it provable?Wall-E wrote:Gamma's claim is provable. Why kill him?
flaw has been pointed out.Wall-E wrote:You're entitled to your opinion, but I think saying Gamma's claimed he will kill townies is a stretch. I doubt that attitude was more than I-just-claimed bravado.
Wouldn't you rather the town have two kills a day? If Gamma doesn't vig our #2 target I will personally lead the charge against him.
What say you, Gamma? Will you agree to vig the town's #2 choice for the lynch every day?
Look how town I am!Wall-E wrote: No. Gamma, do not, under ANY circumstances, vig yourself. I'd rather you vig me than yourself.
What the heck are you talking about? Where have I backed down?corporate wrote:im moving my FoS to aFoS wall e and atlasatlas has backed down since i called him out and it looks like wall e has picked up where he left off. i feel like they are working together.
and jordan, yes i can. did you read his 44?
failure to address points noted.Wall-E wrote:Uh oh, I'm clearly scum for not kneejerk lynching the claimed vig.
I'll come back when people stop repeating things I've already addressed. I see nothing new here aside from YET MORE SPECULATION ON WHO IS BUDDIES WITH WHOM WITH ABSOLUTELY ZERO EVIDENCE AT ALL which is totally retarded.
Name one and I will fucking quote you where I already addressed it.WhereIsTony wrote:failure to address points noted.Wall-E wrote:Uh oh, I'm clearly scum for not kneejerk lynching the claimed vig.
I'll come back when people stop repeating things I've already addressed. I see nothing new here aside from YET MORE SPECULATION ON WHO IS BUDDIES WITH WHOM WITH ABSOLUTELY ZERO EVIDENCE AT ALL which is totally retarded.
So, proving and providing evidence only applies to other players. Wall-E can assume all he wants.Wall-E wrote:I've proved nothing. I'm supposing. That's how we play this game!
WhereIsTony wrote: NEver really explained why you are such a fan. It does however make snse if you are Scum, and are hoping that when and if Gamma buys it you can go "see i told you". Only scum would be so SURE another player is town.
jumps on
nekka for asking hy the allegiance. says it is "provable" puts the flawed number 2 argument in play....why flawed?
because if he is a vig (or a SK) than the mafia know his target they block him if its mafia, and don't if he's town. Effectively supplying the mafia with an extra townkill potential a night.
No.My Milked Eek wrote:1) You're not scum for not kneejerk lynching the scum. You're lying, insinuating stuff that is not there and you believe a claim without any reason to believe him, while there are reasons he could not be a vig, but an sk.
2) I believe you still haven't answered;
- the question of why you directly believe gamma without any doubt.
Already answered that.
- my request of replying to the sk theory
You can't force me to join you in shitty conjecture.
- the request of how a dead townie can prove gamma is a vig
It will prove he's a killer. That's what I said.
- how on earth Gamma can prove anything without being killed in the process
He can't, except that he's a killer. And if, as Tony pointed out, the mafia "block" his night kill, we know who the scum are, so WHY KILL GAMMA?
3) "YET MORE SPECULATION ON WHO IS BUDDIES WITH WHOM WITH ABSOLUTELY ZERO EVIDENCE AT ALL"So, proving and providing evidence only applies to other players. Wall-E can assume all he wants.Wall-E wrote:I've proved nothing. I'm supposing. That's how we play this game!
