lorne do u wanna be my thread mason (insert the pleading face emoji here) i can help you feel less useless uwuIn post 295, Lorne Malvo wrote:Just a mood thing I guess + I'm frankly useless day 1 (or however it longs it takes to flip a mafia)In post 294, Oclaxian Empire wrote: why arent u interested in the game lorne?
Basically all your posts are one line, so sure!In post 298, furtiveglance wrote: Aureal, 1 line is waffling now?
yeah basically its like the puppy dog eyes oneIn post 301, furtiveglance wrote: Is the pleading face the watery eyes one
Why are you doing this specifically? I’m confused on this.In post 302, Aureal wrote:Basically all your posts are one line, so sure!In post 298, furtiveglance wrote: Aureal, 1 line is waffling now?
Hey, I'm just calling it the way I feel like you would feel!
In post 299, patchwork wrote: on me: agree on the overeager town thing, though how is what i said regarding furt's "slip" partnered? i was just saying i didnt wanna jump to conclusions, so i was going with occam's razor there and assuming it's a misread, like how korina and grim both thought maf could only be paired with town
In post 120, patchwork wrote: furtive is that seriously the first thing you come back with lol
Could easily be a scum partner going "OMGWTF dude why did you say that, shut up about that and find something else to talk about so maybe they won't dig at it too much"In post 121, patchwork wrote: furtive please talk players and not mechanics
I'm not sure how to be more clear than I was. I don't agree with most of their reads, they didn't really give reasoning so I don't know where they come from to evaluate why they have those reads, and the thinking my joke is scummy at this point seems like it could be him seeing some people are suspicious of me and positioning to further that wagon.on kt: are you placing them low because you dont agree, or for other reasons?
Yeah, that was part of why I'm feeling Drew here, I clearly didn't really like the way you were telling people what to talk or not talk about. But Lorne is doing it more subtly here, using talk about who's going to get voted off, and it's just a few hours into the game. Really premature sort of comment there.lorne: if theyre trying to guide conversation, ehat about me?
also is sky just a vibe read? /genq
Because I've played with furtive several times and know he likes to scumread people for the way they phrase things. He led a speedwagon to miseliminate me for that sort of thing in our first game together so I find it funny to try to (badly) use the tactic back at him. He actually got mileage out of it to peg a scum everyone else was townreading in the next game we had, so I can't totally dismiss the tactic out of hand, but I still find it weird and thought I'd throw that out there.In post 306, Oclaxian Empire wrote:Why are you doing this specifically? I’m confused on this.In post 302, Aureal wrote:Basically all your posts are one line, so sure!In post 298, furtiveglance wrote: Aureal, 1 line is waffling now?
Hey, I'm just calling it the way I feel like you would feel!
scum have their scum pt so why would they need to post smth like that in the thread?In post 307, Aureal wrote: Could easily be a scum partner going "OMGWTF dude why did you say that, shut up about that and find something else to talk about so maybe they won't dig at it too much"
I feel like patchwork especially would be inclined to just post their thoughts straight away right there to make sure it got to furtive where furtive was posting. Surely the existence of scum PTs doesn't mean scum only direct each other there? There was definitely some scum posting trying to guide the flailing partner in thread in the micro I just finished.In post 309, Oclaxian Empire wrote:scum have their scum pt so why would they need to post smth like that in the thread?In post 307, Aureal wrote: Could easily be a scum partner going "OMGWTF dude why did you say that, shut up about that and find something else to talk about so maybe they won't dig at it too much"
Because why are you going to look at something from RVS, or directly out of RVS and go “that clearly indicates these two are aligned”In post 314, Aureal wrote: I have no idea why the stage of the game would be relevant.
Still not following. Partners are partners no matter what point of the game it is. The partner trying to counsel the flailing scum in my other game was pretty early on. Sometimes scum apparently like to RVS each other to mess with VCA which I also do not understand, but I think it's worth making note of strange interactions if you notice them. Obviously I'm not calling them scum partners at this stage just because of it, but if furtive were to flip scum, I'd give patch a much more wary eye because of that interaction.In post 316, Oclaxian Empire wrote:Because why are you going to look at something from RVS, or directly out of RVS and go “that clearly indicates these two are aligned”In post 314, Aureal wrote: I have no idea why the stage of the game would be relevant.
Timing is everything.
no not reallyIn post 312, Aureal wrote:I feel like patchwork especially would be inclined to just post their thoughts straight away right there to make sure it got to furtive where furtive was posting. Surely the existence of scum PTs doesn't mean scum only direct each other there? There was definitely some scum posting trying to guide the flailing partner in thread in the micro I just finished.In post 309, Oclaxian Empire wrote:scum have their scum pt so why would they need to post smth like that in the thread?In post 307, Aureal wrote: Could easily be a scum partner going "OMGWTF dude why did you say that, shut up about that and find something else to talk about so maybe they won't dig at it too much"
haha, very funnyIn post 319, furtiveglance wrote: I can confirm that patchwork is not my Mafia partner if that helps you at all.