Xyl's Relative Chaos - Game over!

CoheedCambria09 · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:49 am

didnt think people would believe me, i didn't think people would believe me now, because of how "out there" the claim is.

CoheedCambria09 · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:51 am

didnt think people would believe me, i didn't think people would believe me now, because of how "out there" the claim is.

dahill1 · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:04 am

CoheedCambria09 wrote:didnt think people would believe me, i didn't think people would believe me now, because of how "out there" the claim is.

hmm..
ok well if you have no win condition, then you should have no problem with being lynched right?

CoheedCambria09 · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:05 am

yea not really lol To be completely honest.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:25 am

He's just a squashed banana. Nothing to see here. Move it along. No staring.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:27 am

Korts wrote:I also think DGB's change of heart after the claim and her vote on DoomCow without comment is somewhat suspicious.

Only if you forget that I mentioned my agreement with the case against DoomCow earlier.

tubby216 · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:18 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:He's just a squashed banana. Nothing to see here. Move it along. No staring.

that phrase makes me raise an eyebrow

fos dg

Korts · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:33 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Korts wrote:I also think DGB's change of heart after the claim and her vote on DoomCow without comment is somewhat suspicious.
Only if you forget that I mentioned my agreement with the case against DoomCow earlier.

Where, when? Because a quick search of your posts in isolation yielded no results.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:50 am

Korts wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote:
Korts wrote:I also think DGB's change of heart after the claim and her vote on DoomCow without comment is somewhat suspicious.
Only if you forget that I mentioned my agreement with the case against DoomCow earlier.
Where, when? Because a quick search of your posts in isolation yielded no results.

OH crap you're right, I must have forgot to take my dose of SENILIAGRA^TM this morning.

unvote

Korts · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:13 am

unvote, vote: DGB

farside22 · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:21 am

Why did some bad thoughts come in my head with CC claim? I don't like it. I have a terrible taste in my mouth and I'm reminded of Bugs Bunny with a safe falling from the sky.
With that said I think CC should be lynched for his lack of concern on who wins. I do like doomcow as a second option.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:23 am

ZazieR wrote: DoomCow for not adding any content.

Maybe I'm not so senile. I believe that's the post I agreed with, my agreement coming in the form of a vote immediately following.

If DoomCow flips scum, Korts may be his buddy.

Korts · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:25 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
ZazieR wrote: DoomCow for not adding any content.
Maybe I'm not so senile. I believe that's the post I agreed with, my agreement coming in the form of a vote immediately following.

You didn't either quote or mention in any way that post or any other suspicion of DoomCow. If I'm remembering correctly, the whole of your post was the vote.

Are you bussing and trying to tie me to your buddy? Don't worry. You can be honest with me.

farside22 · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:26 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
ZazieR wrote: DoomCow for not adding any content.
Maybe I'm not so senile. I believe that's the post I agreed with, my agreement coming in the form of a vote immediately following.

If DoomCow flips scum, Korts may be his buddy.

I see DC following one lynch after another while offering a me too response is the reason I see his as a second choice for lynched. CC still trumps him for his lack of thoughts for whoever wins gets his vote comment.

DoomCow · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:39 am

I joined the CC wagon for a claim, which we got, and I'm not buying it by the way. I voted GoofBall before for reasons I still believe (voting Animorph for fake PR, while Vi did it twice before), and which are confirmed by this latest action of hm (voting and unvoting me without giving any reason), but since I believe CC is lying (my not believing his claim) I really like my vote where it is.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 1:18 pm

Doomcow, please explain why a scum would come up with a claim of 'squashed banana' instead of, say, 'doc' or 'cop' in order to drag the real one out to counterclaim to at least help his buddies on the way down the guillotine?

Xylthixlm · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 1:31 pm

Vote Count

CoheedCambria09 -

5

(dahill1, farside22, tubby216, DoomCow, Natirasha)
DrippingGoofball -

2

(SpyreX, Korts)
tubby216 -

1

(ZazieR)
dahill1 -

1

(animorpherv1)
DoomCow -

1

(hasdgfas)
Korts -

1

(Crazy)
ZazieR -

1

(Vi)

Not voting: MafiaSSK, CoheedCambria09, DrippingGoofball

With 15 alive, it will take 8 to lynch. The deadline for day 1 will be Saturday, December 6.

animorpherv1 · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:01 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:Doomcow, please explain why a scum would come up with a claim of 'squashed banana' instead of, say, 'doc' or 'cop' in order to drag the real one out to counterclaim to at least help his buddies on the way down the guillotine?

This.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:09 pm

animo, explain.

MafiaSSK · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 5:44 pm

Indeed. Animo, should explain everything they do.

SpyreX · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:59 pm

I joined the CC wagon for a claim, which we got, and I'm not buying it by the way. I voted GoofBall before for reasons I still believe (voting Animorph for fake PR, while Vi did it twice before), and which are confirmed by this latest action of hm (voting and unvoting me without giving any reason), but since I believe CC is lying (my not believing his claim) I really like my vote where it is.

Why did you join for a

claim

?

Why are you justifying a previous vote and then hedging your vote here?

How about answering DGB's question.

I really dont know what to make of CC's business. If this wasn't "relative chaos" the idea of a role without a win condition is silly. We have a sample in the OP so its not because he didn't have a format if he was lying.. also, there is the point DGB does make.

I cant see what is gained from lying like this (unless its for exactly this to happen) - but if thats the case CC was planning this from the beginning which I'm not buying.

Unvote

In essence CC is "third party" to me with this business assuming he's telling the truth which I am thinking he is. DGB still confuses me with the early play but she does raise a valid point about this whole mess.

I'm going to do a reread again of the last few days and see if anything jumps out.

DoomCow · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:25 am

I joined for a claim, because I wanted to hear a claim. I don't believe the claim because it's something I can't place in the ways of how it could work.

As for why he came up with that role instead of something more likely, I'm betting it's because of the theme of the game. Doc or Cop isn't chaotic enough, and some weird sounding, ambiguous role might just clear him for a few days.

The reason I mentioned the GoofBall vote, is simple enough: It was in response to Hasdfgas' post, number 422

farside22 · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:13 am

FOS: Spryex

Do something with that vote. Those who aren't voting need to start. Those who are voting need to start making sense on who needs to be lynched. I would like to see something besides just two weeks for day 2. Thanks

tubby216 · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:22 am

SpyreX wrote:
I joined the CC wagon for a claim, which we got, and I'm not buying it by the way. I voted GoofBall before for reasons I still believe (voting Animorph for fake PR, while Vi did it twice before), and which are confirmed by this latest action of hm (voting and unvoting me without giving any reason), but since I believe CC is lying (my not believing his claim) I really like my vote where it is.
Why did you join for a
claim
?

Why are you justifying a previous vote and then hedging your vote here?

How about answering DGB's question.

I really dont know what to make of CC's business. If this wasn't "relative chaos" the idea of a role without a win condition is silly. We have a sample in the OP so its not because he didn't have a format if he was lying.. also, there is the point DGB does make.

I cant see what is gained from lying like this (unless its for exactly this to happen) - but if thats the case CC was planning this from the beginning which I'm not buying.

Unvote

In essence CC is "third party" to me with this business assuming he's telling the truth which I am thinking he is. DGB still confuses me with the early play but she does raise a valid point about this whole mess.

I'm going to do a reread again of the last few days and see if anything jumps out.

ok so if cc is a "third party" than thats really not protown,, i would like to see a case as to why we should keep him around? by his own admission he could go with either side wich definately does not help town at all if anything its one more sperson left lying around to aid the scumm in muddying up the waters.

staying with my vote

SpyreX · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:35 am

I joined for a claim, because I wanted to hear a claim. I don't believe the claim because it's something I can't place in the ways of how it could work.

As for why he came up with that role instead of something more likely, I'm betting it's because of the theme of the game. Doc or Cop isn't chaotic enough, and some weird sounding, ambiguous role might just clear him for a few days.

The reason I mentioned the GoofBall vote, is simple enough: It was in response to Hasdfgas' post, number 422

What I'm getting at is what does wanting a claim have to do with lynching scum? You vote because you think they are scum and in rare occurrences should the claim itself be what makes you change your mind - normally because it makes some of the behavior fit better. Pushing people simply for the claims themselves is scummy. Scummy enough to

Vote: DoomCow

The thing is he didn't say -anything- about what he could do. He could have claimed some hybrid hider/cop or a myriad of things that would have drawn out something instead of just going down in flames. Thats the reason why I think he's telling the truth.

ok so if cc is a "third party" than thats really not protown,, i would like to see a case as to why we should keep him around? by his own admission he could go with either side wich definately does not help town at all if anything its one more sperson left lying around to aid the scumm in muddying up the waters.

Maybe I was wrong about you. Lynching "third party" is better than lynching town, but it definitely isn't lynching scum. I think there is a very strong chance that scum is on that CC wagon from how it went up and DC is the one that really catches my attention for the reasoning behind it / position on it.