@roden - sorry i was mean last night, i'm feeling pretty frustrated with this game. but i also do think what i said: you have a complete incapability of seeing the game from anyone's perspective that isn't your own. i have called you out so many times this game for it, i have tried to reason with you, i get ignored, i'm done.
but if you want a recap of the takes from you that i consider... plainly untrue:
- claiming that gl was fabricating the gamestate being leaning against him (
2836)
- saying he was ate-ing on a post that clearly isn't it (
3230), citing colour coding of all things as ate
- the stuff you pointed out as gl "wanting drapion dead" or "shading andres" are taking those posts in the most uncharitable way possible (
3310)
- the second part of my
3413 - your actions at that point were not townie. i think if you saw someone else making the arguments you were making, you absolutely would not townread them for it.
- what i said in
3795. you're not my biggest priority to read, you were acting as if i have to use my cop check on you and as if you're the absolute number one priority for me to read for ??? reasons; and what you pointed out as "meta" from me in that pooky normal was very obviously not meta
- like literally the entirety of
3806 is again calling out what i think is utterly faulty thought process from you
- the claim that scum wouldn't be trying to eliminate me because i'm difficult to eliminate (
4944) which is ignoring the *actual* reasons that i am being pushed for that have absolutely nothing to do with dayplay
- the idea that i *have* to relook at you just because i thought there is a theoretical chance that fireisredsir is scum is ???
not directly what you were asking for, but:
- bring consistently ignored about that one q in
4236/
4291 definitely did not help
i am not avoiding the question. you asked me why you're town. i answered. atp i don't think scum-you would be saying this much... incorrect things this game and be this self-assured. i don't think you are s/s with dannflor. fireisredsir doesn't play a role in that.
In post 5119, Roden wrote: In post 5070, Roden wrote:
In post 5058, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Roden, today would be the day to strike back then.
Datisi is the correct play today, what would it take for you to join me on this wagon?
I'm just waiting at this point for anyone who's against a Datisi elim to town case him and explain why him, the green checks, and the Doctor aren't dead.
I also really need someone to explain to me like I'm 5 how/why four scum supported Shea as king but then somehow didn't get onto the council in a town!Datisi world.
Maybe explain what about this is nonsense I guess
well for one, everything about my play has been town and you're incapable of seeing it because you don't like how i was personally treating your slot.
the green checks aren't dead because why would they kill them when they can get me yeeted. i don't know why the doc is dead. if they thought there's a chance the jk is on them, i can see them trying to shoot the jk
i'm not the one making that argument about the shea king supporters. i wasn't even referring to that when i said that you've been saying nonsense this game. you're once again putting words in my mouth and then getting mad at them.
@gl, i'll get back to you in a bit, i'm already missing out on the second half of croatia v morocco