Mafia 86 - mafia.gif - Game Over!

[curiouskarmadog]

unvote, vote ShadowGirl

Her helpful vote counts pre-both-lynches coupled with her joy of the previous night's events are a desperate attempt to appear townie. I don't believe a townie needs to do that.

Voting for the next highest vote getter when you are in the suspicion spotlight = mafia to me.

vote massive

vote rush

explain to me this reasoning and how it is a good vote.

[armlx]

FOS CKD

for that vote.

[curiouskarmadog]

he jumps on the massive bandwagon with little to no content or posts and I get the FoS?...

reasoning?

[armlx]

Look at his general game participation. Compare that to his vote.

[curiouskarmadog]

jumping on the bandwagon (or whoever seems to be getting heat at the time)of the hour. not posting content. but still keeping up with the game.

none of that is scummy to you?

[Sierra]

I believe Seraphim/gorckat is a good candidate for Tar's final night choice. He publicly decried Seraphim/gorckat as scum and it seems logical that he'd verify it. Do you disagree?

Although there is a good possibility Tar targeted Sera, this is guesswork on your part. Tar might have targeted the person he was most suspicious of, or he might not have. There is no way to be sure who Tar would target, unless you could read his mind - which nobody can.

Still I agree that gorckat deserves more attention. Just not because of the tracking/flavour argument, but because Sera was scummy as hell before he was replaced. In a game I played recently, one of the scum admitted to have asked for replacement when he got caught in a tight position, not because he really needed replacement but because he figured a replacement might be the only thing to save him from a lynch. It worked. Thanks to that game, I'm now a bit more wary of people replacing in for someone who was especially scummy.

[curiouskarmadog]

on a side note: this is the least active I have ever seen gorkat...I dont think it means anything, but would like an explanation.

[curiouskarmadog]

EA, I would very much like to hear your general thoughts at this point in the game.

[massive]

Sierra

: While I agree that it is guesswork on my part, I also believe that Tar's statement immediately prior to night ("bringing up a Jester on top of a pure-setup-speculation post at the beginning of the day and major lurkage thereafter", Tar's post [26]) is a good reason to at least give Seraphim/gorckat attention.

I understand that no one seems to think I actually have reasons for voting ShadowGirl, But to say I'm doing it to avoid being the leading bandwagon is kinda far-fetched ... especially since, at that time, I had one vote and ShadowGirl had one vote (if my math skillz are correct).

[armlx]

jumping on the bandwagon (or whoever seems to be getting heat at the time)of the hour. not posting content. but still keeping up with the game.

I think we are differed on whether he is still doing the 3rd thing or not.

[curiouskarmadog]

jumping on the bandwagon (or whoever seems to be getting heat at the time)of the hour. not posting content. but still keeping up with the game.

I think we are differed on whether he is still doing the 3rd thing or not.

well he stated a reason..he had to at least skim.

[Dead Rikimaru]

Cousin Jack's Votecount

massive

(5): gorckat, skitzer, Erratus Apathos, Jebus, Rush

ShadowGirl

(3): hasdgfas, armlx, massive

BlakAdder

(1): farside22

Rush

(1): curiouskarmadog

armlx

(1): springlullaby

Not voting

(5): Cybele, Ku_F, ShadowGirl, Sierra, BlakAdder
Deadline is on

November 27

Needed for a lynch: 9 votes
If by deadline no one has 9 votes the player with more votes is lynched
If two players share the top score of votes lynch is decided by

duel

[armlx]

jumping on the bandwagon (or whoever seems to be getting heat at the time)of the hour. not posting content. but still keeping up with the game.

I think we are differed on whether he is still doing the 3rd thing or not.

well he stated a reason..he had to at least skim.

Skim != keeping up with the game.

[gorckat]

on a side note: this is the least active I have ever seen gorkat...I dont think it means anything, but would like an explanation.

I'm well aware of this. I've never been this busy at work, which is where I do ~50% of my posting. Because I've been working so many weekends and evenings, it's cut into my home posting as well (not as many nights up until midnight.)

I am coming in to work tomorrow, but in a primarily "sit on my ass and make sure the building doesn't fall down" capacity, so I commit to give you folks some more meat to chew on.

I have been reading up on things to stay current, so its just a matter of going back to read up on what some people have referred/pointed to, and justifying my gut feelings and vote.

[Erratus Apathos]

EA, why do you keep mentioning you didnt like the BA case?...is it a badge you want to show off?

I don't need no stinkin' badges. I mentioned it as a reference point for my opinion on the SG case.

unvote, vote ShadowGirl

Her helpful vote counts pre-both-lynches coupled with her joy of the previous night's events are a desperate attempt to appear townie. I don't believe a townie needs to do that.

Voting for the next highest vote getter when you are in the suspicion spotlight = mafia to me.

vote massive

Oh, so you ARE still here? I see you're still using the "lurk, lurk, lurk, jump on a wagon, lurk, lurk" strategy too. And you didn't even bother to answer my questions from the beginning of the day. It's obvious that you're more interested in avoiding attention and surviving than hunting scum, and for that I will see to it that you hang, scum.

Unvote, vote: Rush

EA, I would very much like to hear your general thoughts at this point in the game.

What do you mean by general thoughts?

[curiouskarmadog]

well, I was going to vote your ass if you didnt unvote and revote Rush...I was going to call bullshit on you (stating your original vote on Rush was crap and your unvote reason was also made up)...that question was trying to get you to comment on the game....if you had commented without addressing Rush...I thought I had scum..

but..

you did unvote and revote Rush..

so really I got nothing on you.

[armlx]

So either Rush posts and we get enough info for a full evaluation of his scumminess, or he gets replaced.

That's how I see it.

[curiouskarmadog]

well, he is posting enough to not get replaced...which is crap

[armlx]

well, he is posting enough to not get replaced...which is crap

Is that scummy?

I agree it is crap though.

[Rush]

well, he is posting enough to not get replaced...which is crap

I guess it's a good thing I don't play to please other members. I like to exercise the right to vote, so I pick someone to vote for each night. Beyond that, I'm not going to go around making accusations from nothing all day because everyone else is taking care of that for me. If you want to put me on the spot - here I am. As for the game until now - that's just how I play, get used to it.

[armlx]

Amazing. I love playing with people who are just dead weight.....

[hasdgfas]

well, he is posting enough to not get replaced...which is crap

I guess it's a good thing I don't play to please other members. I like to exercise the right to vote, so I pick someone to vote for each night. Beyond that, I'm not going to go around making accusations from nothing all day because everyone else is taking care of that for me. If you want to put me on the spot - here I am. As for the game until now - that's just how I play, get used to it.

So you're playing by not playing. Wonderful.

[armlx]

BTW, CKD, this is about what I expected, hence my response to you voting him. If he was a remotely established as useful player, I would agree with you.

[curiouskarmadog]

unvote

...I think armlx is right...though he could suck as town or scum

[armlx]

unvote

...I think armlx is right...though he could suck as town or scum

Yeah.

My old stance on people like this was to ignore them if there was a legitimate target. Then I had to play with K7 and SSK for like 5 games in a row. Needless to say, my outlook is open to change.