In post 1251, PenguinPower wrote: In post 1238, Lukewarm wrote:
Risk:Reward
I think that if a scum!LLD landed the king position, we would lose the game.
I think that if a town!LLD landed the king position, she would be effective -- but not massively noticeably more effective towards a town win condition then if she were to be in a council position or in the IC-esque position I described.
I won't stand in the way of king LLD, and can see myself compromising there if the other two look like they might lose to GL, but it kept her from being my first choice - which is what I was working out at the time.
Sorry - why does scum!LLD = game over but town!LLD = no different than placed elsewhere?
I honestly don't know what part of that is confusing to you
Scum getting lots and lots of power = bad... especially when the power is put into the hands of probably the best scum player on the playerlist, someone who would absolutely figure out the best way to maximize the benefits of that power.
This feels like it should be a non-controversial take tbh.
Gonna assume that the question here is about the town scenario then.
I am distinctly [town!lld!king] to [another town player as king + LLD on the council (or cleared)].
And in that scenario, I think that she could effectively scum hunt, use what ever PR she gets, advise the king, ect, from that position too
However, the calculus would change if I thought the alternative to king LLD was a scum king.