Why is it a weak meta?It's a weak meta: as well, I've said also that it shouldn't be the deciding reason to vote.
Hell, see earlier this game.
Is it proven that using the dice for a random vote = scum?Post 0-1: A truly random vote. These always feel a bit off to me for some reason. Something about how you're trying to completely absolve yourself of any responsibility of your vote by making sure people know it's random.
I'm not usually terribly deep in random voting stage, sorry.Posts 2-5: All of these are completely inane comments that do absolutely nothing at all.
It was lurker prodding/random vote. What's wrong with that?Post 6: Lurker prodding. Not a terrible thing to do, but the mod can take care of this.
It's terribly obvious it's a joke. :/ I was merely pointing it out.Post 7: I find this to be a defense of Stef. Before Stef even answers for himself about his vote, SG jumps in saying that it's probably a joke.
It's... randomness.Post 8: What is this supposed to say, exactly?
Because... it is. Do you think he was genuinely insulting his avatar?Post 9: Here ShadowGirl is defending someone else's comment by saying it's just part of the "random vote stage".
I didn't mean in the bearing of scumtells being overlooked, but being hostile about the insults.Post 10: This post seems quite noncommittal to me. She says that we shouldn't excuse stuff because he is new, but also says that we can take into account that he's new. How exactly would we be taking into account that he's new but not excuse anything?
Post 11: How is this unvote constructive at all? It does nothing to move the game forward. Don't you have any real suspicions? Saying that tajo's claim is a null-tell is probably one of the scummiest things I've seen. I don't understand how anyone could think that. Same with Stef's saying he wanted to be lynched and claiming scum, even in a "joking manner". That's something I consider to be defending those two. Claiming that scummy actions they make aren't scummy. That's pretty much the exact definition of defending.
I will agree that part was defense. Still, you have to take the post in context: why would scum make such a claim and get attention? Which, according to you, is what they want to do.Post 12: This is also blatant defending of tajo. The fact that you're saying it's not scummy because it's the "random stage" is even worse. Random stage can be the best time to catch scum doing something scummy because they don't think people are paying attention.
In context, again - I didn't have time to post anything more.Post 13: An extremely inane comment when I'm sure there was plenty of stuff to comment on.
Why not? I don't want someone to accidently hammer. Uh, I didn't say the mafia won't take care him. Why would I bother trying to derail the wagon if I'm scum and know him to be town? You said it yourself, he's too easy on a lynch.Post 16: Why point out that it's L-1 here? Also, there's no way he was a doctor. He would've have claimed vanilla so early as an actual doc. The mafia won't take care of him, are you nuts? He was way too easy of a lynch. I feel like SG was trying to derail the wagon on tajo by saying that he might actually be a doctor. Another defense of a scummy player who doesn't deserve it.
So sue me then. This is my first large game and I find the mass of deaths exciting (as well, I've never played with a cult).Post 17: I hate when people point out it's an awesome night. The only reason to do that is to look town by saying it was a good night because town already knows that.
Post 22: What a useless post. Why even say that?
If we have a cult, we could have a jester? But I did vote him...Post 25: WhyWhy haven't you voted for a scummy person? Because he could be a Jester? Terrible reason, especially because the only thing it does is distract the town.
We shouldn't rush lynches, and he should be able to say his piece.Post 28: Why does L-2 make so much of a difference? If he's scummy, he should be lynched.
Same answer as before. Do you find me saying it more less scummy if I'd only said it only once?Post 29: I still hate this. Pointing out that it was a good night for the town is not useful because we know it was a good night for the town.
Post 30: What about his play made you think he wasn't scum?
I notice I made a mistake in saying I hadn't voted Emp, bah. (Reading) Near the end when he was rampaging with insults something felt off and I would have unvoted him if I had been there to witness it.Post 32: Wait a second, you didn't believe Emp was scum? But you voted for him. What gives? Why point out that massive isn't posting much? Is it just to get attention off of you? It seems like it.
And this is a scumtell how? Anyway, I just wanted to point it out. :/Post 33: I love how SG points out that people I think are scummy have been lynched when I made it pretty obvious that I was reading through the game for the first time.
This post seems very opportunistic to me. You're piling pressure on the two people who have been getting most attention last page, with only a "what they said"-like explanation to excuse the vote and fos.skitzer wrote:eh,vote massiveagain, I feel his case returning, and
FoS: ShadowGirlbecause it's mainly parts other than the dice roll.
and that's not much really.gorckat wrote:Not keen on Shadowgirl. Hard to say why. Just gut over some of the Sera exchanges.
Check again. I never posted a disclamer on any night scene.curiouskarmadog wrote:Dead Rikimaru wrote:MOD NOTE:
The flavor in this post is just a humorous summary of the conversations during the game. No alignement and no portion of the setup is revealed there.MOD, I know that every game I have ever been in that you modded (this would be the third) you have put this disclaimer (or something like it) on your every scene that you post...however, on yesterday's scene you did not.
can you please verify that this is indeed true for this scene? Because I am going on the basis of other games you have modded, but if you cant verify this, it changes things for this game
well i can not quote it because it is closed, but on your post 20 ofDead Rikimaru wrote: Check again. I never posted a disclamer on any night scene.
Voting for the next highest vote getter when you are in the suspicion spotlight = mafia to me.massive wrote:unvote, vote ShadowGirl
Her helpful vote counts pre-both-lynches coupled with her joy of the previous night's events are a desperate attempt to appear townie. I don't believe a townie needs to do that.
That's all you have to say?Rush wrote:Voting for the next highest vote getter when you are in the suspicion spotlight = mafia to me.massive wrote:unvote, vote ShadowGirl
Her helpful vote counts pre-both-lynches coupled with her joy of the previous night's events are a desperate attempt to appear townie. I don't believe a townie needs to do that.vote massive