hi, i'm large normal 242. and i'm over with.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #2475 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 12:22 am

In post 2210, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 2154, MariaR wrote:And then Frog while we're at it because it would take two seconds for them to see the world view they're coming up with is incorrect because I'm hard pushing Pooky but Frog is either town who never thinks they're wrong and needs to go over or just a wolf and I don't think they're a bad player so wolf it is.

Toogeloo can go
Someone find me the wolves in furtiveglance/Save/MT
pedit: I'd rather we vote out scum considering the fact you're lost in the claims since scum can easily fake there claims and if you just look at this game as a game of Mafia Pooky's posts are awful.

In post 2209, MariaR wrote:I still don't believe everyone is telling the truth but hey we've taken up 2 pages so I'ma go to bed

VOTE: Frog

In post 2079, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 2078, MathBlade wrote:I think Frogster’s team is excluded but I don’t see anything that excludes Maria herself
My team changed because I thought BCG was masons with marci. I haven't updated it yet.
You missed 2079 Maria. I was/am rethinking my solve. I think you're playing very survival-oriented and I normally think that's scummy but I'm starting to believe it's NAI for you. I thought your Pooky and MathBlade analysis showed you are applying critical thinking about the game. You're analysis on my slot is lacking a little bit though, you missed that I was reconsidering my PoE in 2079 and you also are FoSing me because you believe I'm underthinking the game. I think you should consider that I'm Town who is overthinking the game and that's why I missed signs that your slot is Town.

readflips on maria because she's voting him and trying to get her on his side after binning her in his solution - claims he was revalling in 2079 but if you go back to that post in context it says nothing about re-valling maria and actually has her at lower than STD who is also in his solution so he's literally moving her down in his solution set

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #2476 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 12:26 am

In post 2238, Frogsterking wrote:I FoS Pooky and BcG. Maybe MathBlade for pushing this dumb plan --which fails to see a single roleblock-- so hard. I wouldn't be sad to see MathBlade killed by a vig. Pooky's claim doesn't fit with my role and Pooky is sus anyway. I also think BcG is sus.

claims he's suspecting me for having the same role as him.

which misses:

1] Rolecop and Follower are not the same role, they dont do remotely the same thing. Followers can get guilties and later in the game when its down to 1 scum they can get innos too

Rolecop is a useless role that basically does nothing except maybe find an encryptor/ascetic

2] the dumbest part of this fucking justification is his reaction to Titus claiming rolecop - so he thinks there can't be follower/rolecop in the same game but he thinks two rolecops is ok?

Frogsterking · Post Post #2477 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 12:32 am

Silence in the court, Pooky. Furtive is currently testifying on his own behalf. Continue to interject your frog hate speech and I will hold you in contempt of court. Your trial is on D3.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #2478 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 12:36 am

objection this frog is engaging in censorship

Frogsterking · Post Post #2479 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 12:44 am

In post 1790, MathBlade wrote:
In post 871, schadd_ wrote:
Spoiler:

vote count 1.7 !

Big Chungus Gaming (4):
KittyTacky, PookyTheMagicalBear, Toogeloo, Frogsterking

Save The Dragons (3):
Gamma Emerald, Charloux, Enchant

Frogsterking (3):
Greeting, Big Chungus Gaming, Save The Dragons

MalcolmTucker (1):
MariaR

Cape90 (1):
SirRhett

Toogeloo (1):
marcistar

Enchant (1):
Cape90

not voting (2):
MalcolmTucker, Fennec

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to blow someone up. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-10-12 15:00:00)

modorator notes

e
Furtive
Dragons
Pooky
MariaR

Is disproven by the D1 greeting wagon

viewtopic.php?p=13520704#p13520704 1.9 (sorry mobile)

That scum team for the most part lurks. A surprise wagon on lurker Greeting would bring a lot of heat and be town driven and Pooky plops on.

Pooky isn’t one to do something without believing it helps him town or scum.

So since Pooky thought switching from BGC to greeting despite it 4 and 4 and both being town in that world.

That doesn’t add up to me.

I'm feeling a Pooky+Dragons+furtive+BCG scum team right about now.

VOTE: furtive

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #2480 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 12:48 am

wolfsterking is HOWLING

furtiveglance · Post Post #2481 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 2:09 am

In post 2472, Enchant wrote:VOTE: furtive

Very faulty logic.

Enchant is scum for sure.

VOTE: Enchant

Enchant · Post Post #2482 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 2:54 am

furtiveglance wrote:
In post 2472, Enchant wrote:VOTE: furtive

Very faulty logic.
Enchant is scum for sure.

VOTE: Enchant

MathBlade · Post Post #2483 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 3:13 am

In post 2447, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2350, Enchant wrote:
In post 2305, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2230, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2229, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2225, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2224, Enchant wrote:
In post 2218, Enchant wrote:
In post 2216, Enchant wrote:Not_Mafia -
Jester
Novice disloyal vig

Spoiler: Acts
N1: No Action
>> Action tonight visit Pooky

Enchant - Modified Investigative

Spoiler: Acts
N1: No Action

Frogsterking - Rolecop

Spoiler: Acts
N1: furtive. Result - JOAT (roleblocker, alien, tracker)

Big Chungus Gaming - Loyal Bodyguard

Spoiler: Acts
N1: ???
>> Action tonight visit Pooky

furtiveglance - JOAT (roleblocker, alien, tracker) <<Elim for today after changing claim

Spoiler: Acts
N1: ???

PookyTheMagicalBear - Follower

Spoiler: Acts
N1: Titus. Result: Investigative Action

Cape90 - Claims "Not Investigative"
Titus - Modified Rolecop

Spoiler: Acts
N1: MalcolmTucker. Result - Vanilla

Toogeloo - Fucking Bullshiter
MathBlade - Vouyer

Spoiler: Acts
N1: Cape90. Result: No one visited.
>> Action tonight visit Pooky

marcistar - Modified Tracker

Spoiler: Acts:
N1: No Action

Save The Dragons - Didn't Claim
MalcolmTucker - Vanilla Townie
MariaR - Vanilla Townie

Alisae - Vanilla Townie
kittytacky - Fruit Vendor

Spoiler: Acts
N1: Not_Mafia

Did i miss anything?

Done.
Updated
Corrected
Fixed. Thanks for the correction
Now super fixed
Anyone else DO NOT VISIT POOKY IF KILLING OR PROTECTIVE
ULTRA fixed. I moved all Vanilla claims and noclaimers late in notes so it's not pain to read.
So this isn’t lost

Remember this people

Enchant · Post Post #2484 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 3:28 am

In post 2368, Enchant wrote:
In post 2350, Enchant wrote:Not_Mafia -
Jester
Novice disloyal vig

Spoiler: Acts
N1: No Action
>> Action tonight visit Pooky

Enchant - Modified Investigative

Spoiler: Acts
N1: No Action

Frogsterking - Rolecop

Spoiler: Acts
N1: furtive. Result - Novice JOAT (roleblocker, alien, tracker)

Big Chungus Gaming - Loyal Bodyguard

Spoiler: Acts
N1: ???
>> Action tonight visit Pooky

furtiveglance - Novice JOAT (roleblocker, alien, tracker) <<Elim for today after changing claim

Spoiler: Acts
N1: No Action

PookyTheMagicalBear - Follower

Spoiler: Acts
N1: Titus. Result: Investigative Action

Cape90 - Claims "Not Investigative"

Titus - Modified Rolecop

Spoiler: Acts
N1: MalcolmTucker. Result - Vanilla

Toogeloo - Fucking Bullshiter
MathBlade - Vouyer

Spoiler: Acts
N1: Cape90. Result: No one visited.
>> Action tonight visit Pooky

marcistar - Modified Tracker

Spoiler: Acts:
N1: No Action

Save The Dragons - Didn't Claim
MalcolmTucker - Vanilla Townie
MariaR - Vanilla Townie

Alisae - Vanilla Townie
kittytacky - Fruit Vendor

Spoiler: Acts
N1: Not_Mafia
Fixed again.

This one is actual.

MathBlade · Post Post #2485 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 3:30 am

Thanks sorry!

MathBlade · Post Post #2486 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 3:31 am

In post 2484, Enchant wrote:
In post 2368, Enchant wrote:
In post 2350, Enchant wrote:Not_Mafia -
Jester
Novice disloyal vig

Spoiler: Acts
N1: No Action
>> Action tonight visit Pooky

Enchant - Modified Investigative

Spoiler: Acts
N1: No Action

Frogsterking - Rolecop

Spoiler: Acts
N1: furtive. Result - Novice JOAT (roleblocker, alien, tracker)

Big Chungus Gaming - Loyal Bodyguard

Spoiler: Acts
N1: ???
>> Action tonight visit Pooky

furtiveglance - Novice JOAT (roleblocker, alien, tracker) <<Elim for today after changing claim

Spoiler: Acts
N1: No Action

PookyTheMagicalBear - Follower

Spoiler: Acts
N1: Titus. Result: Investigative Action

Cape90 - Claims "Not Investigative"

Titus - Modified Rolecop

Spoiler: Acts
N1: MalcolmTucker. Result - Vanilla

Toogeloo - Fucking Bullshiter
MathBlade - Vouyer

Spoiler: Acts
N1: Cape90. Result: No one visited.
>> Action tonight visit Pooky

marcistar - Modified Tracker

Spoiler: Acts:
N1: No Action

Save The Dragons - Didn't Claim
MalcolmTucker - Vanilla Townie
MariaR - Vanilla Townie

Alisae - Vanilla Townie
kittytacky - Fruit Vendor

Spoiler: Acts
N1: Not_Mafia
Fixed again.
This one is actual.

Remember if you’re not on the visit Pooky list don’t visit Pooky

MathBlade · Post Post #2487 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 3:40 am

Don’t forget if Frog is scum so is likely Toog

furtiveglance · Post Post #2488 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 3:50 am

Enchant dancing on my grave D:

ISO · Post Post #2489 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 5:00 am

Game is nuts. Not sure I feel furtive though

furtiveglance · Post Post #2490 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 5:03 am

In post 2489, Save The Dragons wrote:Game is nuts. Not sure I feel furtive though

Yeah neither.

MalcolmTucker · Post Post #2491 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 5:05 am

Has much changed or is it still an endless back and forth between players who have claimed?

Enchant · Post Post #2492 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 5:06 am

In post 2488, furtiveglance wrote:Enchant dancing on my grave D:

Just in a case. I can presume you are town wanting to dodge massclaim, because i also could do that. But how you act is not how town would.

Atleast Town!you should had some understanding that it's at minimum NAI for Rolecop to reveal you, when noticing you was lying. Your accusations are not towny.

So yeah. It will not work.

MalcolmTucker · Post Post #2493 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 5:13 am

I'd be perfectly content with a Furtive elimination at this point as well from a brief catch-up. Their jokey/playful tone doesn't feel natural and sounds more like scum to me trying to dodge suspicion by looking like they don't care, without having to particularly commit to reads.

MalcolmTucker · Post Post #2494 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 5:15 am

Even if Pooky's ISO here isn't particularly identical to early-game Lost, I've definitely seen a few games where Pooky is fairly quiet in terms of fully-formed reads despite having a higher post count. I'm not seeing them as scum and feel like when a read depends too heavily on meta comparisons to work, it's not a great or massively strong scumread.

furtiveglance · Post Post #2495 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 5:27 am

In post 2492, Enchant wrote:
In post 2488, furtiveglance wrote:Enchant dancing on my grave D:
Just in a case. I can presume you are town wanting to dodge massclaim, because i also could do that. But how you act is not how town would.

Atleast Town!you should had some understanding that it's at minimum NAI for Rolecop to reveal you, when noticing you was lying. Your accusations are not towny.

So yeah. It will not work.

It will work, probably tomorrow or D4.

furtiveglance · Post Post #2496 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 5:28 am

In post 2493, MalcolmTucker wrote:I'd be perfectly content with a Furtive elimination at this point as well from a brief catch-up. Their jokey/playful tone doesn't feel natural and sounds more like scum to me trying to dodge suspicion by looking like they don't care, without having to particularly commit to reads.

Vote for me then, get your hands dirty.

MalcolmTucker · Post Post #2497 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 5:38 am

In post 2496, furtiveglance wrote:
In post 2493, MalcolmTucker wrote:I'd be perfectly content with a Furtive elimination at this point as well from a brief catch-up. Their jokey/playful tone doesn't feel natural and sounds more like scum to me trying to dodge suspicion by looking like they don't care, without having to particularly commit to reads.
Vote for me then, get your hands dirty.

How many votes are you at? I'm wary because it seems you've accumulated a good few and we have some notorious quickhammer players in the game. If it's settled to eliminate you though I'm more than happy to hammer.

marcistar · Post Post #2498 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 6:00 am

In post 2497, MalcolmTucker wrote:
In post 2496, furtiveglance wrote:
In post 2493, MalcolmTucker wrote:I'd be perfectly content with a Furtive elimination at this point as well from a brief catch-up. Their jokey/playful tone doesn't feel natural and sounds more like scum to me trying to dodge suspicion by looking like they don't care, without having to particularly commit to reads.
Vote for me then, get your hands dirty.
How many votes are you at? I'm wary because it seems you've accumulated a good few and we have some notorious quickhammer players in the game. If it's settled to eliminate you though I'm more than happy to hammer.

ur literally scum

furtiveglance · Post Post #2499 (ISO) » Thu Oct 20, 2022 6:00 am

In post 2497, MalcolmTucker wrote:
In post 2496, furtiveglance wrote:
In post 2493, MalcolmTucker wrote:I'd be perfectly content with a Furtive elimination at this point as well from a brief catch-up. Their jokey/playful tone doesn't feel natural and sounds more like scum to me trying to dodge suspicion by looking like they don't care, without having to particularly commit to reads.
Vote for me then, get your hands dirty.
How many votes are you at? I'm wary because it seems you've accumulated a good few and we have some notorious quickhammer players in the game. If it's settled to eliminate you though I'm more than happy to hammer.

I don't know myself. It doesn't matter though. Anyone who votes for me is outed mafia, which may in fact mean this is a bastard game with ~ 8 mafia if I do get hammered.