hi, i'm large normal 242. and i'm over with.

MathBlade · Post Post #1725 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:12 pm

Let’s chill the fuck out a second here.

Frogsterking · Post Post #1726 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:18 pm

In post 1724, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like you're basically scum siding clown show

Speaking of scum siding clown shows:

In post 906, schadd_ wrote:Not_Mafia replaces Gamma Emerald

I forgot about this. I had a pretty solid Town read on Gamma in this game. This causes NM to also be invited to the Towncore.

Frogsterking · Post Post #1727 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:36 pm

In post 1723, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:VOTE: frogster

this slot is town but if we dont elim him we will lose this game

In post 1720, Frogsterking wrote:Okay, why are you focused on my vote in particular though? IIRC I don't think I was even the first one to FoS you.

Cape90 · Post Post #1728 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:45 pm

oh so pooky is town

Titus · Post Post #1729 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:49 pm

UNVOTE: Pooky

You do what you think is best Pooky. I don't really care. If you think it would help Math have a realization moment, please do.

MathBlade · Post Post #1730 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:50 pm

In post 1729, Titus wrote:UNVOTE: Pooky

You do what you think is best Pooky. I don't really care. If you think it would help Math have a realization moment, please do.

I am curious do you think the wagon on Pooky is still pure?

Titus · Post Post #1731 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:51 pm

I have three hours of driving ahead of me. I won't be responsive. As long as no speed hammer, I don't care.

Titus · Post Post #1732 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:51 pm

In post 1730, MathBlade wrote:
In post 1729, Titus wrote:UNVOTE: Pooky

You do what you think is best Pooky. I don't really care. If you think it would help Math have a realization moment, please do.
I am curious do you think the wagon on Pooky is still pure?

Yes, but I'm too tired to reset and things are ongoing.

MathBlade · Post Post #1733 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:55 pm

In post 1732, Titus wrote:
In post 1730, MathBlade wrote:
In post 1729, Titus wrote:UNVOTE: Pooky

You do what you think is best Pooky. I don't really care. If you think it would help Math have a realization moment, please do.
I am curious do you think the wagon on Pooky is still pure?
Yes, but I'm too tired to reset and things are ongoing.

Yeah I really would strongly recommend filling in the blanks Pooky

Because I don’t think that’s a Townie answer.

Maybe Titus is exhausted but I don’t think Titus doesn’t reevaluate in the face of new information.

I’d really love something that would help fill that in.

Then I can announce my plan.

Titus · Post Post #1734 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:58 pm

Literally just said I was too tired to reset.....

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1735 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:00 pm

In post 1727, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 1723, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:VOTE: frogster

this slot is town but if we dont elim him we will lose this game

In post 1720, Frogsterking wrote:Okay, why are you focused on my vote in particular though? IIRC I don't think I was even the first one to FoS you.

because you're incapable of reading

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1736 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:01 pm

I mean I don't think it's a great idea for me to fill in the blanks and I'm the one with the result and I'm saying Titus is probly town for it so ???

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1737 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:02 pm

like I'll fill in the blanks if Titus wants me to prove that I actually have a result on her but I don't see why I would do it if she believes me

MathBlade · Post Post #1738 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:02 pm

In post 1737, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like I'll fill in the blanks if Titus wants me to prove that I actually have a result on her but I don't see why I would do it if she believes me

Because I am an investigative TPR.

Frogsterking · Post Post #1739 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:03 pm

In post 1735, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 1727, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 1723, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:VOTE: frogster

this slot is town but if we dont elim him we will lose this game

In post 1720, Frogsterking wrote:Okay, why are you focused on my vote in particular though? IIRC I don't think I was even the first one to FoS you.
because you're incapable of reading

This feels like pooky!scum tbh

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1740 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:05 pm

In post 1738, MathBlade wrote:
In post 1737, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like I'll fill in the blanks if Titus wants me to prove that I actually have a result on her but I don't see why I would do it if she believes me
Because I am an investigative TPR.

do you want all the investigative TPRs to claim ? :/

MathBlade · Post Post #1741 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:06 pm

In post 1740, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 1738, MathBlade wrote:
In post 1737, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like I'll fill in the blanks if Titus wants me to prove that I actually have a result on her but I don't see why I would do it if she believes me
Because I am an investigative TPR.
do you want all the investigative TPRs to claim ? :/

Let’s assume you’re truthtelling in being a PR.

Then what TPR when Titus doesn’t care shouldn’t very well matter.

If you are a TPR then protectives on you already.

It’s not like being more or less specific makes you more or less dead.

And no I think you and I are the only claims needed.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1742 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:07 pm

In post 1733, MathBlade wrote:Maybe Titus is exhausted but I don’t think Titus doesn’t reevaluate in the face of new information.

I think she has a reason to believe what she believes and its anti-town to get her to say why.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1743 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:07 pm

In post 1741, MathBlade wrote:If you are a TPR then protectives on you already.

in a game with multiple investigatives I dont think we have any protectives

MathBlade · Post Post #1744 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:08 pm

In post 1743, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 1741, MathBlade wrote:If you are a TPR then protectives on you already.
in a game with multiple investigatives I dont think we have any protectives

Then in that world if you’re town you’re dead anyway so might as well share it.

I has reason to think there’s protectives though.

Frogsterking · Post Post #1745 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:11 pm

In post 1740, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 1738, MathBlade wrote:
In post 1737, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like I'll fill in the blanks if Titus wants me to prove that I actually have a result on her but I don't see why I would do it if she believes me
Because I am an investigative TPR.
do you want all the investigative TPRs to claim ? :/

This is projection imo

MathBlade · Post Post #1746 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:12 pm

So my suggestion: if you’re willing to take it, is to fill in the blanks.

Then soon as you do, I out my crumbs and see if we can get a circle of confirms.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1747 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:14 pm

In post 1746, MathBlade wrote:So my suggestion: if you’re willing to take it, is to fill in the blanks.

Then soon as you do, I out my crumbs and see if we can get a circle of confirms.

alright let's wait for titus to have a think about it and if she wants to i'll claim my info on her

schadd_ · Post Post #1748 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:15 pm

schadd_ · Post Post #1749 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:15 pm