First of all thank you for answering about Sirdan. Next, I'm really confused by what you mean in the last 2 lines there. Why would town double if Gretel exposes herself? I don't understandSpyreX wrote: And now to test my mettle,
I'm asking for Gretel.
Her brother is torqued,
For he was obviously pork.
I'm willing to assume,
that she is no loon.
So despite our new troubles,
with her outed town doubles.
So you, Fleur, as a claimed Prince role, decided to check and see if Spyre, who is accepted to be Rumpelstiltskin, had the shoe you were looking for? This does not make sense to me, for why would you target someone whom you already knew was not a princess? If you are searching for a shoe, then I would assume you are looking for Cinderella, if not a princess in general, so why select Rumpelstiltskin? I would think that, unless you are not actually searching for a princess, that it would be clear that Spyre would not help you in achieving your mission. Could you please explain your reasoning for your night action, as it just is not adding up with your role claim in my opinion.fleurdelys wrote:Target? So you want to know whom I choose to check? Ok, it was you, Spyrex, and you weren't the right person
This makes no sense. "To check each person randomly" is not a good move as there is no basis for the decision and it's not looking at any people's actions during that day that showed they could be pro-town or anti-town. Looking at these actions can help the outcome on a players decision. Also each night is valuable as each nightaction can not go to waste as town is at a disadvantage at the moment. Basically you've wasted a nightaction for no reason. Spyre X's role has already been confirmed. His posting restricition has already been accepted and even his mission was succeded by Porkens who even stated his name "Rumplestilskin" which in turn gave him vig powers. Not to insult you here but to me it was a foolish and useless move. I certianly don't like how your going to use that style of play since it doesn't add any substance to the town.fleurdelys wrote:I have just thought I am going to check every single person randomly. Yes, the technique might be bad but it is the one i feel comfortable with. How can i be sure that spyrex's claim was true? so i have just checked him -just in case
and now, i am sure
The answer by far,What makes you sure that Porkens was Hansel? I can get why you thought he was one of the two characters, but why Hansel by name?
I think I understand what you mean now. By finding out who gretel is, then that will narrow the possibilites of who could be scum in the game.SpyreX wrote:I will quip
In a game with no flip.
Every bit we can get
Can help us not get bit.
I'm going to assume that the pair,
is fair and square.
Thus confirming her narrows,
who we look for in barrows.
not necessarily.CoheedCambria09 wrote:I think I understand what you mean now. By finding out who gretel is, then that will narrow the possibilites of who could be scum in the game.SpyreX wrote:I will quip
In a game with no flip.
Every bit we can get
Can help us not get bit.
I'm going to assume that the pair,
is fair and square.
Thus confirming her narrows,
who we look for in barrows.
a number of possibilities pop to mind such as possible doc protect, SK killed Porkens, the mafia no-killed for some reason, the mafia didn't have a kill for some reason, you're the mafia, etc. Most of them degenerate into NK WIFOM. I agree that it is most likely that Porkens was town, but I'm just bothered by the fact that he was pretty scummy.SpyreX wrote:I dont find it dumb,
to think Gretel could be scum.
The idea that pork isn't town,
definitely makes me frown.
Answer me this dahill,
If he's scum who did they kill?
Maybe i am missing something in translation here, but you are saying that Porkens changed his avatar to someone that looked like Hansel? And by that you mean Owen Wilson playing "Hansel" in Zoolander? Thats a pretty far reach.SpyreX wrote:The answer by far,
lies in his avatar.
At the start of the game,
this picture did change.
To what it became?
Someone with that name.
I dont shoot from the hip,@Wolf: Yes, I have already breadcrummbed my role. God I hope the birds don't eat them.
If this statement is true the assuming a pair is already out the window. If Hansel and Gretel are indeed in this game which at this point I would assume then I would logically speculate that the two of them would be the "sibling variation" role in which two players have contact with each other and if one or the other dies then both of them go down as well.SpyreX wrote:I will quip
In a game with no flip.
Every bit we can get
Can help us not get bit.
I'm going to assume that the pair,
is fair and square.
Thus confirming her narrows,
who we look for in barrows.
Ergh. I have no idea what I meant to say in that beggining statement. Just scratch that off my post. I think what I meant to say was "If porkens was Hansel then Gretel would most likely be dead and getting Gretel to claim would most likely not work." This is of course based on the Sibling speculation.If this statement is true the assuming a pair is already out the window. If Hansel and Gretel are indeed in this game which at this point I would assume then I would logically speculate that the two of them would be the "sibling variation" role in which two players have contact with each other and if one or the other dies then both of them go down as well.
) No, I meant the one SpyreX quoted in post #591. Sorry if the wording was off. I just wanted to reference the breadcrumb and it was already quoted on the page, just wanted to point to it, as it were.Biohazard wrote:Hmm...fair enough. Your role and actions seem to fit in places. Basically it blows my sibling theory out of the water. However at what point did Sprye X quote Porken's breadcrumb before his death?