Mini 687 - Time Abuse Mafia (Game Over in Epic Fashion)

[Grandfather Time]

Da.

[forbiddanlight]

You all could say forget Netlava and vote me to touch ^-^.

[Natirasha]

Proxy my vote to Vi, then

[MafiaSSK]

Touch:Netlava

[Netlava]

Explain this.

Cruciare's excuse for not posting his reasons comes after I repeat the question again a second time. Thus, for not posting the excuse, especially a non-game related one, the first time I asked, I take his excuse with a bigger grain of salt. Plus, going back to Cruciare's post, he admits that his vote on scattered was bad, which suggests that he may have had difficulty finding an excuse to my accusation.

Speaking of Cruciare,

Prod Cruciare

.

That depends on this objekt, doesn't it?

Depending on an objekt is like depending on an unknown.

I'm not using meta, I'm using the fact that EVERY EVENT SO FAR HAS PUSHED THE DEADLINE BACK!

There's only been one event so far, and that resulted in 2 deaths.

I feel like in a total unknown situation like this the best array of people is a total mix - pro-town, anti-town, power role, boring role......Does nobody else agree that an ultimate mixture is the safest and best play?

How would we go about doing this?

[forbiddanlight]

There's only been one event so far, and that resulted in 2 deaths.

Two events. The original opening of the temporal gate and the explosion.

[Netlava]

I only see one deadline extension, and that occurred from Nov. 9th to Nov. 17th. Where's the other one?

[forbiddanlight]

I misread then. My guesses are all off! *cries*. I thought we had a super short deadline that got extended during the temporal vortex.

[RossWilliam]

I feel like in a total unknown situation like this the best array of people is a total mix - pro-town, anti-town, power role, boring role......Does nobody else agree that an ultimate mixture is the safest and best play?

How would we go about doing this?

There would have been no definite way to achieve that totally, unless you had a known power role and a known townie, and pro-town versus anti-town could be guessed at if not determined....in sum, though, it's an ideal, not entirely realistic, and it's not happening, we're going a different route, so theres no point focusing on could-haves and maybes

[Vi]

Touch:Netlava

o.0
Innuendo aside, the lack of a stated reason to go with it is noted. (Yes, I can infer that you just wanted to get things going, but...)

Depending on an objekt is like depending on an unknown.

It IS depending on an unknown. But discussion is awesome, regardless of what sparks it. And we're about to find out what that discussion will entail, since you're going on a one-way trip to the bold unknown as soon as the mod gets in.

[Netlava]

Discussing who touches an objekt when it's pretty much random is pretty useless imo.

[Vi]

Discussing who touches an objekt when it's pretty much random is pretty useless imo.

Is it random?

[Cruciare]

Explain this.

Cruciare's excuse for not posting his reasons comes after I repeat the question again a second time. Thus, for not posting the excuse, especially a non-game related one, the first time I asked, I take his excuse with a bigger grain of salt. Plus, going back to Cruciare's post, he admits that his vote on scattered was bad, which suggests that he may have had difficulty finding an excuse to my accusation.

Speaking of Cruciare,

Prod Cruciare

.

Sorry, I'm really busy with exams now, and will be even busier in the coming weeks. I may have to ask to be replaced if I find that I become too busy.

Netlava, to be fair (on me), neither of your 'questions' were actually questions, and I didn't really feel a need to defend myself against your initial suspicion (which was like, one word). The second time, you directed multiple statements at me against several of my posts, so I assumed that you wanted me to defend myself then. And I said that my not immediately giving reasons was bad, but there was nothing wrong with the vote itself.

[Netlava]

Yeah, that's true. I thought I worded it in question form, but I guess I didn't.

Meh, at this rate, it looks like it's no lynch for today. Hopefully, I get some nifty killing powers to make up for the lack of bloodshed in this game. Probably target forbiddan or Cruciare at this point.

Is it random?

Um, I don't know. Results = unknown. I'm assuming scum don't know what happens either. So reactions will be pretty useless since town and scum would react the same way.

I misread then. My guesses are all off! *cries*. I thought we had a super short deadline that got extended during the temporal vortex.

That means that your accusation on me is invalid now, correct?

You all could say forget Netlava and vote me to touch ^-^.

Why do you want to touch the objekt?

Vote: Mafia SSK
You deemed putting hands on the objekt "Too risky".
Killing people kan get us information and with the time travel, we kould bring bak people who we didn't want dead.

Dying is A-Ok, wanting to live is skummy.

How scummy do you think MafiaSSk is? Is he your top suspect at this point?

[Vi]

Um, I don't know. Results = unknown. I'm assuming scum don't know what happens either.

So reactions will be pretty useless since town and scum would react the same way.

Not necessarily...

----

...aaaaaaaaaaaand it appears I was wrong about the touching happening before the deadline, unless Grandfather Time is getting lethargic in his old age.
Which brings me to the same point I've been harping on for a while now: No Lynch. Yes or no?

[Netlava]

Earlier in the game, I said yes. I still say yes, since no lynch only postpones the inevitable. Since kills seem to be activated using the device, nks won't reveal any info either until someone activates the device (correct me if I'm wrong). Touching things won't either.

A no lynch here and pretty soon, we'll be in lylo without having conducted a single lynch.

[forbiddanlight]

That means that your accusation on me is invalid now, correct?

Not quite. You still seemed to be rushing us to a lynch that made no sense. I'm almost with Vi about a no lynch.

Why do you want to touch the objekt?

I'm an attention whore and feel there are very good benefits to touching the object along or with three others. I explained this earlier.

A no lynch here and pretty soon, we'll be in lylo without having conducted a single lynch.

I think it would be moronic to no lynch every day. I think it wise to try to get more information though.

[Netlava]

Not quite. You still seemed to be rushing us to a lynch that made no sense. I'm almost with Vi about a no lynch.

What does "almost" with Vi mean?

Not quite. You still seemed to be rushing us to a lynch that made no sense. I'm almost with Vi about a no lynch.

Which lynch did I rush us up to?

[forbiddanlight]

What does "almost" with Vi mean?

I still like my vote on you ^-^

Which lynch did I rush us up to?

Sorry, *ATTEMPTING* to rush us to a lynch. Mine. For weak reasons at that.

[Netlava]

I still like my vote on you ^-^

That doesn't answer the question.

Sorry, *ATTEMPTING* to rush us to a lynch. Mine. For weak reasons at that.

You aren't anywhere near a lynch.

[forbiddanlight]

That doesn't answer the question.

I think that lynching you has more benefit than no lynching at this point in time. This might be revised.

You aren't anywhere near a lynch.

hence the word attempting, since you were all "We need to vote somewhere!" and started pushing me.

[Netlava]

hence the word attempting, since you were all "We need to vote somewhere!" and started pushing me.

That =/= rushing us to a lynch.

[Vi]

Sorry, *ATTEMPTING* to rush us to a lynch. Mine. For weak reasons at that.

You aren't anywhere near a lynch.

With all due respect, neither is anyone else.

If we're going to lynch today, some bandwagoning needs to start happening, soon. I'm not unhappy with my vote, although SSK could use a prod <_<
So if you want us to lynch, 'might as well make clear who you want to have strung up. Are you comfortable with your vote, Netlava?

I'm an attention whore

I'll vouch for this *shot repeatedly*

[forbiddanlight]

That =/= rushing us to a lynch.

It was still an exhortation of the vacuum of votes to try to get someone lynched.

[Netlava]

Speaking of prods,

Prod PEG

.

If we're going to lynch today, some bandwagoning needs to start happening, soon. I'm not unhappy with my vote, although SSK could use a prod <_<
So if you want us to lynch, 'might as well make clear who you want to have strung up. Are you comfortable with your vote, Netlava?

I'm comfortable with my vote, but I still need to iron out my reads. A large portion of the town is the hard to get a read on type.

It was still an exhortation of the vacuum of votes to try to get someone lynched.

Which is the correct thing to do when faced with a deadline and a vacuum of votes.