I can answer this one:charter wrote:Yes, why was afatchic replaced before moospiker?
When I PM'd the mod, I told him I'd be willing to replace afatchic. I didn't know the game needed two replacements. *shrug*
I can answer this one:charter wrote:Yes, why was afatchic replaced before moospiker?
Characterizing afatchic as a flaker and lurker lynch does not do enough justice. Firstly, for the entire last month, afatchic had been continuously promising to give some serious analysis, but never manages to do so while posting on minor things to seem like he's contributing. So I thought he was likely to be lurking-in-plain-sight-scum. And what made this even worse was that afatchic was posting significantly in other games while avoiding and eventually giving up in this game, which signaled to me that he was not motivated to play as scum who is being attacked from multiple directions.kuribo wrote:MM calls fatchic out on not contributing (yes, that happens WHEN PEOPLE FLAKE)...MM calls fatchic scummier than JDodge. (This is a thinly veiled lurker lynch)
kuribo 352 wrote:Vi says telling people his suspicions makes him a target. (No. Telling people who you think is TOWN makes THEM a target) How the hell do you play mafia without voicing suspicions? Vi claims it wasn't serious.
Notice that IVi 161 wrote:Telling people my suspicions just makes me a target.
...But I'll take one for the team. Avinyl is my stated top suspect, though I should do a reread to see if this needs changing. Second place is a tie between you and charter.
Vi 172 wrote:That was blatant mockery of charter and afatchic.
charter 139 wrote:I don't really see the need to give my opinions on everyone. It will let scum know whether to keep my alive or not, if anyone wants my specific thoughts or something, I'm more than happy to provide them.
Incidentally, the quoted part of charter 139 still bothers me. Why so interested in staying alive?afatchic 150 wrote:however i don't think it is a good idea for people that have played the whole game and have made there opinions pretty clear to make a detailed list of what they think of everyone at an L-1 position, or close. it just gives the scum way too much info to go on.
See above link.kuribo 352 wrote:The band comes out because it's HALFTIME!
It would be nice to have your opinion onkuribo 352 wrote:Page 10- Vi finds eld scummy and votes him. (Or bussing?) eld claims vanilla townie. (yeah, okay, and I'm the King of Siam) charter makes a bit of a case on eld. Explains that he thinks eld and Moo are the scum pair. (I say Vi and Eld, but, hey) Vi reinforces that in my diseased mind by taking eld off L-1. (Was it the vanilla claim that did it for you?) eld and charter going back and forth a bit. Vi votes charter. (saw this coming)
Three on that page, to be pedantic. But do tell whatkuribo 352 wrote:Page 6 Summary- Vi almost changes my mind about Kris, but two posts won't do it, scum, sorry.
Yes, but if you've played with fatchic, you'd know that he's often irrational, acts extremely anti-town even when town, and becomes frustrated as a result. Perhaps it was a bit unfair of me to characterize it as a potential lurker lynch, but again, I'm a bit biased toward fatchic, considering I know his alignment.Machiavellian-Mafia wrote:Characterizing afatchic as a flaker and lurker lynch does not do enough justice. Firstly, for the entire last month, afatchic had been continuously promising to give some serious analysis, but never manages to do so while posting on minor things to seem like he's contributing. So I thought he was likely to be lurking-in-plain-sight-scum. And what made this even worse was that afatchic was posting significantly in other games while avoiding and eventually giving up in this game, which signaled to me that he was not motivated to play as scum who is being attacked from multiple directions.kuribo wrote:MM calls fatchic out on not contributing (yes, that happens WHEN PEOPLE FLAKE)...MM calls fatchic scummier than JDodge. (This is a thinly veiled lurker lynch)
1. Irrelevant. There's time to sort things out, and it'd be stupid to lynch him today. Moospiker's behavior is sufficiently disturbing enough to call it into doubt.Vi wrote: A few things I'd like for you to follow up on.
*Moospiker's claim. True or false?
*Least likely to be scum. Vi, eldarad, or Machiavellian-Mafia?
*JDodge. Safely Town or room for doubt? (Or comical third option?)
*charter. Safely Town or room for doubt? (Or comical third option?)
Like what.kuribo 355 wrote:It's also blatantly ignoring some of the other criticisms I've had of you.
It's not irrelevant. Lest you forgot, there are two scum in this game, and you've already named them IYO. If you've found both scum, Moospiker's claim is true.kuribo 355 wrote:1. Irrelevant. There's time to sort things out, and it'd be stupid to lynch him today. Moospiker's behavior is sufficiently disturbing enough to call it into doubt.
You did. You also called M-M for a "thinly veiled lurker lynch", which would seem to me to be a significant scumtell.kuribo 355 wrote:2. MM. I thought I made that clear I thought you and eld were most likely scum partners?
Is this stance worth reconsidering in light of Moospiker claiming Cop soon afterward?kuribo 355 wrote:You question charter's interest in staying alive, on the contrary, I read that as charter thinking ahead to the NK and not wanting to tell the scum who they should kill. This would set him up Day 2 as a target for lynching when his "Most Favoritest Townie" turns up dead that night. Regardless of HIS alignment. But, where it ACTUALLY leads from there is circular. (Did he really kill them, or did the scum want us to think that? Or did the scum just think the person was pro-town as well?)
I don't do it for your benefit, though, I do it for mine and to give my thoughts on what's happened.charter wrote:Not liking kuribo's replacement post (though I do appreciate it not just being a summary of the game. Hate when that's all a replacement post is. I've been in the game, I know what's happened). I will elaborate later.
I don't know for a fact that you're both scum together, only that you're both my prime suspects.Vi wrote:Like what.kuribo 355 wrote:It's also blatantly ignoring some of the other criticisms I've had of you.
I asked if I was missing something, and you gave me a vague-as-heck answer like this. Similarly, I asked what I could do to change your opinion, and you ignored that question entirely. If this is how you're going to go about this, I'm going to be as helpful as you are.
It's not irrelevant. Lest you forgot, there are two scum in this game, and you've already named them IYO. If you've found both scum, Moospiker's claim is true.kuribo 355 wrote:1. Irrelevant. There's time to sort things out, and it'd be stupid to lynch him today. Moospiker's behavior is sufficiently disturbing enough to call it into doubt.
You did. You also called M-M for a "thinly veiled lurker lynch", which would seem to me to be a significant scumtell.kuribo 355 wrote:2. MM. I thought I made that clear I thought you and eld were most likely scum partners?
'See, my problem with what you're doing is similar the same problem that caused me to vote charter (oh wait, I only did that as an excuse to pair up with eldarad; logic be darned). You claim to have found both scum, and are thus proceeding to dismiss what other people are doing as Very Scummy but not worthy of your interest.
----
Is this stance worth reconsidering in light of Moospiker claiming Cop soon afterward?kuribo 355 wrote:You question charter's interest in staying alive, on the contrary, I read that as charter thinking ahead to the NK and not wanting to tell the scum who they should kill. This would set him up Day 2 as a target for lynching when his "Most Favoritest Townie" turns up dead that night. Regardless of HIS alignment. But, where it ACTUALLY leads from there is circular. (Did he really kill them, or did the scum want us to think that? Or did the scum just think the person was pro-town as well?)
I wasn't clear. I don't like the conclusions you made or your thoughts (I think they are a little off). I do like that you did give your thoughts and not just a summary of the game.kuribo wrote:I don't do it for your benefit, though, I do it for mine and to give my thoughts on what's happened.charter wrote:Not liking kuribo's replacement post (though I do appreciate it not just being a summary of the game. Hate when that's all a replacement post is. I've been in the game, I know what's happened). I will elaborate later.
Why are you ignoring him? Because you're losing the argument?Vi wrote:All right, time to tune out the new guy.~
If ignoring the other person is how you win an argument, I suppose so.JDodge 364 wrote:Why are you ignoring him? Because you're losing the argument?Vi wrote:All right, time to tune out the new guy.~
easy lynch gogogoJDodge 364 wrote:I'm not liking my vote as much since kuribo replaced in, and eldarad has been piquing my interest for some time, and I think an eldarad lynch is more likely to materialize before deadline, so...
Unvote, vote: eldarad
So the answer is "yes", or is this some flippant sarcasm instead of an actual response? Because, y'know, it was aVi wrote:If ignoring the other person is how you win an argument, I suppose so.JDodge 364 wrote:Why are you ignoring him? Because you're losing the argument?Vi wrote:All right, time to tune out the new guy.~
Smart lynch gogogoVi 3:3 wrote:easy lynch gogogoJDodge 364 wrote:I'm not liking my vote as much since kuribo replaced in, and eldarad has been piquing my interest for some time, and I think an eldarad lynch is more likely to materialize before deadline, so...
Unvote, vote: eldarad
Flippant sarcasm.JDodge 366 wrote:So the answer is "yes", or is this some flippant sarcasm instead of an actual response? Because, y'know, it was aVi wrote:If ignoring the other person is how you win an argument, I suppose so.JDodge 364 wrote:Why are you ignoring him? Because you're losing the argument?Vi wrote:All right, time to tune out the new guy.~responseI was looking for.
He quotes my entire post in 360, but ignores IMO the most important part (above). A thorough job if I say so myself.Vi 357 wrote:Like what.kuribo 355 wrote:It's also blatantly ignoring some of the other criticisms I've had of you.
I asked if I was missing something, and you gave me a vague-as-heck answer like this. Similarly, I asked what I could do to change your opinion, and you ignored that question entirely. If this is how you're going to go about this, I'm going to be as helpful as you are.
I see one mention of eldarad before your vote. You're voting to deadline lynch eldarad six days before the actual deadline, and I'm assuming you're leaving me to fill in the blanks for further motives again beyond that single mention of eldarad. I'd also like to know why you dropped kuribo/afatchic after the replacement.JDodge 366 wrote:Smart lynch gogogoVi 3:3 wrote:easy lynch gogogoJDodge 364 wrote:I'm not liking my vote as much since kuribo replaced in, and eldarad has been piquing my interest for some time, and I think an eldarad lynch is more likely to materialize before deadline, so...
Unvote, vote: eldarad
Because, assume I believe Vi and Eld to be scum together. We don't have to lynch both in one day. I believe Vi to be scummier, in part because of Kris' behavior.charter wrote: Your page eight summary. All you basically say is we should be pressuring Vi. Why? Why did your analysis of page eight and on become much much less meaty than the first seven pages?
And most importantly, WHY VOTE VI, WHY NOT ELD?
Yawn. Maybe later. I can't really elaborate much more anyways other than:charter wrote:I guess this is just because I didn't think Kris was scummy then.
JDodge, elaborate your vote for eld, or I will vote you.