tubby216 -
Crazy -
Korts -
animorpherv1 -
Vi -
SpyreX -
DrippingGoofball -
DoomCow -
Not voting: MafiaSSK, Natirasha
With 15 alive, it will take 8 to lynch. The deadline for day 1 will be Saturday, December 6.
Okay, let's talk about it, then. Unvoting in the early game, especially from a vote you did not make of your own accord and therefore aren't responsible for it, does not promote discussion other than perhaps being called out for it. It doesn't really evoke reactions, because it isn't something that affects someone negatively (as in the case of a vote, where someone gets a vote closer to a lynch). Do you think unvoting without revoting is constructive? If so, how?hascow wrote:Post 159 - Korts: No, we can totally talk about it here, since we can't talk about it out of game. Why push this conversation to the side when it could have bearing on the game?
As much as I myself don't like the page number senselessly waved in my face when trying to scumhunt, I think when people are committing to ahascow wrote:Post 144 - Korts: ALERT! ALERT! PAGE ARGUMENT SIGHTED!
You're basing this due to one game, right? Normally, I'm not as vocal in my games as that one. I'm trying to change that. I used to ask questions, and since that game you are referring to, I started to build cases more instead of asking questions. I liked that play of mine so I try to do it in my new games as well as you could see a bit with Tubby.Cow wrote:zazier seems really quiet to me. I've seen her post more often than this. Why haven't you said much?
I still need to reread, had some busy days but will eventually get to it though. As for that post, I clearly state my suspicions towards Vi and Animorpherv1.hasdgfas wrote: Post 149 - DoomCow: Wow, what a wonderful noncommital post.
Because of that scummy looking post he made about Crazy.hasdgfas wrote: Post 151 - DoomCow: Why do you think he's the option?
Wow! no analysis on day 1. Imagine that. It's just, what is there to analyse? Since nobody died as of now, we don't know the possible motives around anything that has happened. So any analysis made at this point would have to be revised later.hasdgfas wrote: DoomCow: Hasn't posted any analysis. Just information. I(and tarhalindur) find that scummy. High scumminess.
I think there has been plenty of actions that are worthy of a closer look.DoomCow wrote:It's just, what is there to analyse?
And what's wrong with revising the analysis with new information gained? There is no point in an analysis if you're only willing to make it when there's been mod-confirmed information revealed. You might as well just ask the mod to post the setup and role PM distributions.DC wrote:Since nobody died as of now, we don't know the possible motives around anything that has happened. So any analysis made at this point would have to be revised later.
DoomCow wrote:I still need to reread, had some busy days but will eventually get to it though. As for that post, I clearly state my suspicions towards Vi and Animorpherv1.hasdgfas wrote: Post 149 - DoomCow: Wow, what a wonderful noncommital post.
See Post 184.animorpherv1 wrote:DoomCow wrote:I still need to reread, had some busy days but will eventually get to it though. As for that post, I clearly state my suspicions towards Vi and Animorpherv1.hasdgfas wrote: Post 149 - DoomCow: Wow, what a wonderful noncommital post.unvote vote: DoomCow. Your a great suspect, the fake PR's are what we want to do. We've already talked abou tit. It's ocer. Stop brininging ti up. I ahve a new PR, bulit just for you.
*DoomCow sucks*
Happy?
For what, their fake PRs? Sure, they're anti-town, but you can't lynch someone just based on that, especially when it's completely obvious that they're fake.DoomCow wrote:I still need to reread, had some busy days but will eventually get to it though. As for that post, I clearly state my suspicions towards Vi and Animorpherv1.hasdgfas wrote: Post 149 - DoomCow: Wow, what a wonderful noncommital post.
Could you explain this a bit better? I don't understand what you're trying to say here.animorpherv1 wrote:But I was annoyed at the fact he wanted to vote us both because of personal preference. If you can't take personal prefernce, then you have a problem.
I'll explain.hasdgfas wrote:Could you explain this a bit better? I don't understand what you're trying to say here.animorpherv1 wrote:But I was annoyed at the fact he wanted to vote us both because of personal preference. If you can't take personal prefernce, then you have a problem.
Seconded, I dont understand either.hasdgfas wrote:Could you explain this a bit better? I don't understand what you're trying to say here.animorpherv1 wrote:But I was annoyed at the fact he wanted to vote us both because of personal preference. If you can't take personal prefernce, then you have a problem.
I don't want to lynch them on the plain fact they're using fake PR's. I voted Vi for it, but when I was shown he actually stated to be using a fake PR I immediatly unvoted. I just find that a deliberate lie (i.e. faking a PR) to town is bad. I'll shut up about this for now though.hasdgfas wrote:For what, their fake PRs? Sure, they're anti-town, but you can't lynch someone just based on that, especially when it's completely obvious that they're fake.DoomCow wrote:I still need to reread, had some busy days but will eventually get to it though. As for that post, I clearly state my suspicions towards Vi and Animorpherv1.hasdgfas wrote: Post 149 - DoomCow: Wow, what a wonderful noncommital post.
That said, I don't like morph's post 185 where he says "the fake PRs are what we want to do. It's over". It seems a wee bit OMGUS to me because the response seems so much stronger than that attack required.
Well what happened to doing this? I see this as you next post:The Internet wrote:I have been prodded. I'm sorry, but I can' contributte because I do not understand the tubby situation. I will hope to contribute more tommorrow.
Highly questionable coming from someone who has offered nothing this game thus far.The Internet wrote:This game seems to be slowing down.
I would like quotes on Korts saying this. I don't like paraphrasing if that is what this is.Crazy wrote:Anyone believe that Korts reallywasmaking a case against tubby just to gauge reactions? I don't. Saying "Nevermind about all that stuff I was doing; I didn't really mean it" is a scum-tell in my book.
Anyone else have thoughts on this?
Vote: Korts
Anything else game related you wish to share. Maybe someone you find scummy?DrippingGoofball wrote:I don't believe faking post restrictions is a null tell. At all.
That is not helpful at worse it's like asking for a no lynch and waiting for the next day to see what the night brings. Pressure people, add to the conversation. Talk about things that bother your, ect. Not at least adding addressing what you find scummy is anti-town.DoomCow wrote:There's nothing wrong with revising an analysis, I just prefer to have a confirmed base behind it, so it's not a complete do over.
And I´m not asking for role-PM distributions, because that takes away the game. I like to know a bit and guess at the rest.
I really don't like the lets give the newb a break, however the lack of conversation from some is very telling in my book.Vi wrote:What about a bad newb move?SpyreX 195 wrote:I'm waiting for any reason for his business to be anything but a bad scum move.