Of course I remember my own theories. But you should remember all the other things I said. You know, like that it is UNTESTED, UNPROVEN, and that I have been wrong before. I feel strongly in my theory, but there is no way that I'm going to use it as my only barometer for detecting scum until it is completely proven. You shouldn't either.hp [leaves] wrote:Kinetic, remember your 1 town, 1 scum, 1 non-town theory?
You're Minbari. Nat and KoC are also Minbari. One was scum and the other is non-town. That leaves you as AoL.
Not to mention, you're not following your own logic.
hp [leaves] wrote:Narn (1 town, 1 scum, 1 non-town)
malt (gunsmith-like town role)
dybeck (confirmed non-town)
pop (left to be scum)
I see this as you flailing. Trying to grab onto anything to keep from drowning. You're tightly holding onto the theory, but then in less than a page are disregarding it.hp [leaves] wrote:If we all think that Malt is cleared, then pop is definitely scum. Why not lynch a scum instead of someone non-town?
Wait, he is MIA. And can't counter-claim.
There is just something wrong with your logic and I can't accept anything you're saying.
Anyone who blindly follows this theory before such a time as it is proven is scummy. Using it as additional evidence is all well and good, but it should never be the only reason.
No, Tar is right in this instance. The Psi-Corps is the organization, and P-12s or higher can become Psi-Cops, which is a position within the Psi-Corps.hp [leaves] wrote:Wikipedia also says I'm a Psi-"Corp". It seems like Tar made another spelling mistake =/
Anyway, I'm unsure exactly what to do... There is some question exactly how true malt's readings are.
We still have a decent amount of time, and I think that I would like TheInternet to make a claim. He's been floating around too much and was very casual when placed under pressure earlier.