Exactly.SC wrote:I don't associate post restrictions with mini normals, nor do I think the pictures in and of themselves warrant a vote. If Primate is allowed to speak in words, I'd rather he do so, but his actions are not per se scummy.
You'll notice he is currently voting.Corvuus wrote:So I think that at the very LEAST he can type "Vote: Insert name" to show that he can at least contribute that. But if he doesn't vote, then that is so glaring anti-town that we pretty much would have to get rid of him just to move on.
Corvuus wrote: how about I ask a question about something I have always wondered about.
Let's say we have a group of 4 players (whether by lurking, only replying when spoken to directly, etc.) who are able to survive and make it all the way to lylo without saying a *single* scummy thing at all.
You know 1 is mafia, but you really have no idea which? What do you do? It could be as simple as 'no lynch' to improve random odds of victory or it could be using the beginning random vote, or it could be that you would never let the game get to this point by hanging the people who couldn't be read... I don't know.
I guess I just want to see how you guys respond.
Corvuus
I don't get this post. One, Primate is voting, and the mod has counted his vote on me when he typed it in words. Two, if you think Primate is merely anti-town instead of scummy, then why are you voting him? Three, why are you viewing Primate as a liability to the town that needs to be disposed of?Corvuus wrote:I didn't say Primate's voluntary PR is scummy, I said it was anti-town.
i.e. it doesn't give us info or help the town overall.
I can't get a read on a 'picture' in order to determine what he is thinking/saying, etc. and how can he contribute to a real discussion with only pictures/smilies?
I mean, for all of you I could do a PBPA at some point but for him, if I click on his name now it is a bunch of pictures or a dancing smiling thing. He doesn't even have a random vote! The only word he has spoken is /confirm at the beginning!
So I think that at the very LEAST he can type "Vote: Insert name" to show that he can at least contribute that. But if he doesn't vote, then that is so glaring anti-town that we pretty much would have to get rid of him just to move on.
So yeah, I don't think he is scum; but until he types a word/vote I am voting for him (or if someone scummier appears).
Corvuus
Personally, I think that Primate's being pretty clear with his posts. Sure, he's having some fun, and not being as informative as he could be, but I'm pretty well following what he's saying. How is his picture-posting anti-town?Corvuus wrote:I didn't say Primate's voluntary PR is scummy, I said it was anti-town.
i.e. it doesn't give us info or help the town overall.
Posts #127 and #128 make quite a bit of sense to me, so I think I've figured him out.MacavityLock wrote:Personally, I think that Primate's being pretty clear with his posts. Sure, he's having some fun, and not being as informative as he could be, but I'm pretty well following what he's saying.
We're past it now. A lot of the current cases have something or other to do with Primate.Apothecary wrote:Sorry I've been off for too long.
Are we past Random Voting, or are we working with tangible evidence?
You do know that Primate's vote is now on SC, right? He moved his random vote when he called SC a convenience store robber. I'd expect a townie to be paying more attention to the guy he's voting for than Corvuus has.Corvuus wrote:sorry, i don't consider /confirm,
vote: *blank*
in order to make it 2>1.
in the first two posts of the game with nothing else said as contributing.
If he can unvote and change his vote, etc. then good job.
i am voting him to pressure him to actually say something or unvote/vote. I didn't say he was scum but he is being stubborn, not helping and what is wrong with voting for someone who isn't scumhunting or contributing?
Corvuus
I wrote this in response:Corvuus wrote:But if he doesn't vote, then that is so glaring anti-town that we pretty much would have to get rid of him just to move on.
I'll allow whether voting in and of itself is contributing to be debated (I don't think so), but for you to make an untrue statement and then use that statement to push a utility lynch is scummy.StrangerCoug wrote:Three, why are you viewing Primate as a liability to the town that needs to be disposed of?
I have no problem with voting someone who isn't scumhunting, and pressure voting someone who isn't contributing is not scummy in my book. What is wrong, however, is that if this is a post restriction of his as we believe, then voting him to get him to speak in words is useless.StrangerCoug wrote:i am voting him to pressure him to actually say something or unvote/vote. I didn't say he was scum but he is being stubborn, not helping and what is wrong with voting for someone who isn't scumhunting or contributing?
Are you actually reading the thread, or are you skimming? You are pressure voting Primate to get him to do something he either most likely can't do or already did. The "vote: *blank*" is actually a vote on me—in post #76, the line breaks after the word "vote" on a 1024×768 monitor.StrangerCoug wrote:sorry, i don't consider /confirm,
vote: *blank*
in order to make it 2>1.
First it was against zeppo not Smitey. Quote correctly.MiteyMouse wrote:Is that a good or a bad thing? Hehehe!Evilgorrilaz wrote:FoS:Smitey
Jumpy is not as scummy as trying to blend in. Actually I don't think mitey is blending in right now.
Sorry...about the quote thing. I think That me being me is a good thing...but I was trying to make a bit of a joke...hence the hehehe!Evilgorrilaz wrote:First it was against zeppo not Smitey. Quote correctly.MiteyMouse wrote:Is that a good or a bad thing? Hehehe!Evilgorrilaz wrote:FoS:Smitey
Jumpy is not as scummy as trying to blend in. Actually I don't think mitey is blending in right now.
And why don't you tell me?
