was going to say thatIn post 670, SirCakez wrote:I agree regardless of Toog alignmentIn post 667, Toogeloo wrote:I think Anahit's reaction though basically town spews them though.
You saying there appeared to be consensus that two scum were on Greeting -- yeah, that's a real question. I see someone else has questioned that same thing. So I don't know why you think it's explained by context or how you came to that conclusion, and not the conclusion that there were two scum on Greeting but that that seemed to be the consensus feeling.In post 666, mc esther wrote:i dont think prodding at me with weird points trivially explained by context, or anahit with questions about frankly the least alignment-indicative hammer possible (and then? voting dwlee?) is where he's at as town.
Kinda a weird previewed post! I think even if you disagree, having no comprehension of why Toogeloo pings people is odd.In post 674, anahit wrote:kinda weird pedit hereIn post 672, Isis wrote:The overall arc feels like toog stepped into a softly pressured slot and started meming because splitting people 50/50 on what to make of you is plenty enough to survive light pressure in a game where numerous slots have gotten shade. Maybe I'm confbiased.
Pedit: well that is my why!
hm,In post 680, Isis wrote:Kinda a weird previewed post! I think even if you disagree, having no comprehension of why Toogeloo pings people is odd.In post 674, anahit wrote:kinda weird pedit hereIn post 672, Isis wrote:The overall arc feels like toog stepped into a softly pressured slot and started meming because splitting people 50/50 on what to make of you is plenty enough to survive light pressure in a game where numerous slots have gotten shade. Maybe I'm confbiased.
Pedit: well that is my why!
At a basic level I find Eden's flame scummy in their approach to the game but I'm more interested in onwagon so I can only be frustrated.
Well, see that's a problem because I really am not liking anyone other than anahit except for toogs, but that is tempered by their predecessor, and maybe Cakez.In post 683, Isis wrote:I felt good about Cakez day 1 but I feel less good about him day 2, I'm surprised you're inverted Galron
What are you liking?
Pointing on the umpteenth reason to townread anahit seemed kind of more benefitting-to-scum-than-town to me
i think(?) isis was referring to cakez agreeing with townread of me for treatment of toogeloo's 'claim' hereIn post 684, Galron wrote:Well, see that's a problem because I really am not liking anyone other than anahit except for toogs, but that is tempered by their predecessor, and maybe Cakez.In post 683, Isis wrote:I felt good about Cakez day 1 but I feel less good about him day 2, I'm surprised you're inverted Galron
What are you liking?
Pointing on the umpteenth reason to townread anahit seemed kind of more benefitting-to-scum-than-town to me
I can certainly why someone with one town read benefits scum, but I can't tell from your post whether you think I'm scum because I have just one town read, because I have just one town read and I've mentioned that I townread her at least twice, because other people have evinced a town read on her and I just needlessly contributed to it or whether you're accusing me of scum-siding at all and I'm just inadvertently helping scum by throwing more laurel-leaves anahit's way.
maybe i should have said 'noteworthy' as opposed to weird hereIn post 682, Isis wrote:It seemed incredibly serendipitous to me which is a type of weird so maybe from your perspective weird make sense.
If your angle is "fake pedit" I don't think I'd ever do that as scum, since I would worry about the contents of the pedit seeming faked. I'm intrigued by the concept now though
also sometimes due to unsuredness but! that one is almost certainly not alignment neutralIn post 687, anahit wrote:there have been dozens if not hundreds of times where i had a thought/began writing a post and did not post it for at least 10 minutes, as i am often posting when otherwise occupied and! i easily become distracted
hm, thoughts on ahri and isis posts after your first post on day 2?In post 686, Toogeloo wrote:I suspect Cakez was fishing me earlier irt my first post on Day 2, and then flipped their read on me as a scum read. My suspicion is they wanted me to play my hand, if I had one.
I think Pooky is laying low as well and didn't know if I actually had info or not.
I've started feeling like you're town this day phase even though you were one of my stronger scumreads. I don't think you have partners in this game, it seems like, and your reads kind of align with mine some. You disagree about Toog but I can see the other direction on them too? And you feel uninformed enough.In post 684, Galron wrote:Well, see that's a problem because I really am not liking anyone other than anahit except for toogs, but that is tempered by their predecessor, and maybe Cakez.In post 683, Isis wrote:I felt good about Cakez day 1 but I feel less good about him day 2, I'm surprised you're inverted Galron
What are you liking?
Pointing on the umpteenth reason to townread anahit seemed kind of more benefitting-to-scum-than-town to me
I can certainly why someone with one town read benefits scum, but I can't tell from your post whether you think I'm scum because I have just one town read, because I have just one town read and I've mentioned that I townread her at least twice, because other people have evinced a town read on her and I just needlessly contributed to it or whether you're accusing me of scum-siding at all and I'm just inadvertently helping scum by throwing more laurel-leaves anahit's way.
I'm also wondering what intrigues you about fake pedits. As in whether you've just not thought of the concept prior to what you believe to be an inferred accusation of having done that or something else.
In addition, I'm curious as to why my read of Cakez doesn't align with yours.
And while I'm thinking about it, I need to look at the plist again to make sure I do, indeed, have just one town read because that may have changed. In particular I want to read Cakez because your mentioning of that read to me makes me wonder more things. And now that I think about it, I may have a better handle on this game than what I was thinking a few hours ago.
not only did i not say this, it's pretty clear from the post (okay! apparently not that clear! but i dont know how it couldve been clearer, so!) that i could not possibly have had any idea of what the consensus might be. i was kinda surprised on actually reading the thread to find that there had been no direct speculation on this, like, idk, just seems the place to look to me. but yeah, after vanderscamp came through with the same question im kinda like "okay, i guess town do miss this".In post 677, Galron wrote:You saying there appeared to be consensus that two scum were on Greeting -- yeah, that's a real question.
i didnt mention activity and fwiw, i dont think i would ever go after you over activity.In post 677, Galron wrote:Look, I get that I haven't been as active today as I was yesterday, but I've got reasons for that that have nothing to do with this game. Well, little to do with it. At least the pace has picked up a bit from where we were yesterday. Anyway, I may or may not be more active going forward. There's stuff going on IRL, and this hasn't been a priority this week.
Looking back at both...In post 689, anahit wrote:hm, thoughts on ahri and isis posts after your first post on day 2?In post 686, Toogeloo wrote:I suspect Cakez was fishing me earlier irt my first post on Day 2, and then flipped their read on me as a scum read. My suspicion is they wanted me to play my hand, if I had one.
I think Pooky is laying low as well and didn't know if I actually had info or not.
This was supposed to say I'm curious why my read of Cakez not aligning with yours is a concern. But the other question is valid too.In post 684, Galron wrote:In addition, I'm curious as to why my read of Cakez doesn't align with yours.
Yeah... that part was actually the start of a new thought and should've been it's own post, it wasn't directed at you so much as at the game. My fault for not splitting that up.In post 692, mc esther wrote:i didnt mention activity and fwiw, i dont think i would ever go after you over activity.
I'm not sure why I was a scum read to begin with, maybe you said it but I don't remember, so okay I guess I need to take a look at that to figure this out.In post 691, Isis wrote:I've started feeling like you're town this day phase even though you were one of my stronger scumreads. I don't think you have partners in this game, it seems like, and your reads kind of align with mine some. You disagree about Toog but I can see the other direction on them too? And you feel uninformed enough.In post 684, Galron wrote:Well, see that's a problem because I really am not liking anyone other than anahit except for toogs, but that is tempered by their predecessor, and maybe Cakez.In post 683, Isis wrote:I felt good about Cakez day 1 but I feel less good about him day 2, I'm surprised you're inverted Galron
What are you liking?
Pointing on the umpteenth reason to townread anahit seemed kind of more benefitting-to-scum-than-town to me
I can certainly why someone with one town read benefits scum, but I can't tell from your post whether you think I'm scum because I have just one town read, because I have just one town read and I've mentioned that I townread her at least twice, because other people have evinced a town read on her and I just needlessly contributed to it or whether you're accusing me of scum-siding at all and I'm just inadvertently helping scum by throwing more laurel-leaves anahit's way.
I'm also wondering what intrigues you about fake pedits. As in whether you've just not thought of the concept prior to what you believe to be an inferred accusation of having done that or something else.
In addition, I'm curious as to why my read of Cakez doesn't align with yours.
And while I'm thinking about it, I need to look at the plist again to make sure I do, indeed, have just one town read because that may have changed. In particular I want to read Cakez because your mentioning of that read to me makes me wonder more things. And now that I think about it, I may have a better handle on this game than what I was thinking a few hours ago.
anahit in like the next post is right that i was shading Cakez. The totality of the circumstances for him overemphasizing the townread is off, your mentioning it more than once is fine.
fake pedits intrigue me because I think I just straight up have never considered that you could fake a pedit that it is a thing you could choose to do. Just kind of like. "Wow actually you could play a Goblin Guide and block with it no one actually ever implied you can't do that but like oh you can do that wow" So yes when shiki implied it that was the first I've ever thought of it.
