Micro 1040: Shirley, You Blitz!
-
-
Galron Jack of All Trades
-
-
Radical Rat They/ThemJack of All TradesThey/Them
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6528
- Joined: November 22, 2015
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: Space Colony ARK
Sure thing, what alignment are we now?In post 536, AtE wrote:
Works for me. Radical Rat, wanna be my new hydra partner?In post 478, AtE wrote:I want RH9 as my new hydra partner. What do you say Jingle? They aren’t cooperating with me. :/
-tE-
-
Radical Rat They/ThemJack of All TradesThey/Them
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6528
- Joined: November 22, 2015
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: Space Colony ARK
This is a very interesting point, however I don't think it necessarily applies here. For one, I don't actually think Meg's ISO is boring. Push on bugspray, easy though it may have been, is something I agreed with, obviously, and the fact that she actually gave thought to my intentional MeLo idea and offered legitimate criticism beyond "No that's stupid," is interesting to me, though perhaps my personal involvement biases me somewhat.In post 543, AtE wrote:Mental load? As town you could post freely, as jester all the more, as scum it's important not to get sent to college - resulting in more boring-looking posting styles.
-tE
However, there's also the fact that the existence of Jesters is public. If I were scum, my goal would be to look like a Jester, which would involve Not being boring. Though of course, each individual would likely have a different approach, and I'm not good enough at meta reads, or confident enough in my knowledge of any of these players regardless. Except maybe N_M, but he's dead already so.-
-
Radical Rat They/ThemJack of All TradesThey/Them
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6528
- Joined: November 22, 2015
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: Space Colony ARK
Is there any particular reason you scumread us?
-
-
schadd_ he/itpandora's pukeboxhe/it
- pandora's pukebox
- pandora's pukebox
- Posts: 7942
- Joined: December 28, 2016
- Pronoun: he/it
- Location: mountain bathroom
me toooooooIn post 549, Galron wrote:I wonder if N_M still thinks Meg and RH9.-
-
Radical Rat They/ThemJack of All TradesThey/Them
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6528
- Joined: November 22, 2015
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: Space Colony ARK
And what drastic actions would you be considering?In post 535, RH9 wrote:
Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.In post 510, Radical Rat wrote:What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.
Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."
So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?-
-
Jingle For Whom the Bell Trolls
- For Whom the Bell Trolls
- For Whom the Bell Trolls
- Posts: 15209
- Joined: July 17, 2013
- Location: Texas
-
-
Galron Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5011
- Joined: April 26, 2020
-
-
schadd_ he/itpandora's pukeboxhe/it
- pandora's pukebox
- pandora's pukebox
- Posts: 7942
- Joined: December 28, 2016
- Pronoun: he/it
- Location: mountain bathroom
i hadn't felt inspired by the bugspray vote (seemed like a jester, would be hard to get associatives), but they also just didnt seem like someone that had a high probability of being town. i didn't say anything abt bugsy, but i also had already stated two townreads on people who weren't bugsy which i think makes it fairly clear that they would have been in my poe. i forgot that there was the deadline threshhold thing at deadline & i thought that it was just chosen randomly among people who had the most votes; in the couple hours left in the day, there wasn't really enough time for another good faith wagon (maybe somebody decides on a whim to vote megaz? but i also didn't really mind keeping them in the game) but there would be a theoretical possibility of mafia/jesters piling onto someone randomly. so i just voted bugspray. i don't think that this really changed any outcomes.
with regards to 554: i mean i have been thinking that. i think nm's reads are decent and i'd think he was telling the truth. idk what to tell you.
theoretically i might get pissed at you for not like trying to talk to me about those things before voting me except i think i've barely been doing that with anyone else. but also keep in mind i will be trying to get you to townread me bc thats something that would nearly win us the game (with respect to mafia) if that happens-
-
Galron Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5011
- Joined: April 26, 2020
-
-
Galron Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5011
- Joined: April 26, 2020
-
-
Galron Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5011
- Joined: April 26, 2020
-
-
schadd_ he/itpandora's pukeboxhe/it
- pandora's pukebox
- pandora's pukebox
- Posts: 7942
- Joined: December 28, 2016
- Pronoun: he/it
- Location: mountain bathroom
VOTE: megazumarill-
-
Galron Jack of All Trades
-
-
RH9 he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Epping, New South Wales, Australia
I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.In post 555, Radical Rat wrote:
And what drastic actions would you be considering?In post 535, RH9 wrote:
Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.In post 510, Radical Rat wrote:What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.
Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."
So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?-
-
RH9 he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Epping, New South Wales, Australia
I missed his Jester claim.In post 564, RH9 wrote:
I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.In post 555, Radical Rat wrote:
And what drastic actions would you be considering?In post 535, RH9 wrote:
Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.In post 510, Radical Rat wrote:What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.
Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."
So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?-
-
Radical Rat They/ThemJack of All TradesThey/Them
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6528
- Joined: November 22, 2015
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: Space Colony ARK
Why did you think he was begging you to vote him???In post 565, RH9 wrote:
I missed his Jester claim.In post 564, RH9 wrote:
I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.In post 555, Radical Rat wrote:
And what drastic actions would you be considering?In post 535, RH9 wrote:
Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.In post 510, Radical Rat wrote:What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.
Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."
So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?-
-
RH9 he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Epping, New South Wales, Australia
Because he wanted to annoy me?In post 566, Radical Rat wrote:
Why did you think he was begging you to vote him???In post 565, RH9 wrote:
I missed his Jester claim.In post 564, RH9 wrote:
I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.In post 555, Radical Rat wrote:
And what drastic actions would you be considering?In post 535, RH9 wrote:
Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.In post 510, Radical Rat wrote:What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.
Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."
So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?-
-
RH9 he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Epping, New South Wales, Australia
I mean at least N_M is happy now.In post 567, RH9 wrote:
Because he wanted to annoy me?In post 566, Radical Rat wrote:
Why did you think he was begging you to vote him???In post 565, RH9 wrote:
I missed his Jester claim.In post 564, RH9 wrote:
I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.In post 555, Radical Rat wrote:
And what drastic actions would you be considering?In post 535, RH9 wrote:
Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.In post 510, Radical Rat wrote:What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.
Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."
So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?-
-
MegAzumarill She/HerJack of All TradesShe/Her
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: July 14, 2021
- Pronoun: She/Her
-
-
MegAzumarill She/HerJack of All TradesShe/Her
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: July 14, 2021
- Pronoun: She/Her
Who would want to annoy you so you vote for them?In post 567, RH9 wrote:
Because he wanted to annoy me?In post 566, Radical Rat wrote:
Why did you think he was begging you to vote him???In post 565, RH9 wrote:
I missed his Jester claim.In post 564, RH9 wrote:
I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.In post 555, Radical Rat wrote:
And what drastic actions would you be considering?In post 535, RH9 wrote:
Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.In post 510, Radical Rat wrote:What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.
Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."
So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?
This should've been an instant red flagImprefection is the spice of life.-
-
MegAzumarill She/HerJack of All TradesShe/Her
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: July 14, 2021
- Pronoun: She/Her
-
-
RH9 he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Epping, New South Wales, Australia
I thought that this was N_M's playstyle.In post 570, MegAzumarill wrote:
Who would want to annoy you so you vote for them?In post 567, RH9 wrote:
Because he wanted to annoy me?In post 566, Radical Rat wrote:
Why did you think he was begging you to vote him???In post 565, RH9 wrote:
I missed his Jester claim.In post 564, RH9 wrote:
I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.In post 555, Radical Rat wrote:
And what drastic actions would you be considering?In post 535, RH9 wrote:
Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.In post 510, Radical Rat wrote:What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.
Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."
So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?
This should've been an instant red flag-
-
RH9 he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: November 15, 2019
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Epping, New South Wales, Australia
Sorry.In post 572, RH9 wrote:
I thought that this was N_M's playstyle.In post 570, MegAzumarill wrote:
Who would want to annoy you so you vote for them?In post 567, RH9 wrote:
Because he wanted to annoy me?In post 566, Radical Rat wrote:
Why did you think he was begging you to vote him???In post 565, RH9 wrote:
I missed his Jester claim.In post 564, RH9 wrote:
I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.In post 555, Radical Rat wrote:
And what drastic actions would you be considering?In post 535, RH9 wrote:
Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.In post 510, Radical Rat wrote:What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.
Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."
So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?
This should've been an instant red flag-
-
MegAzumarill She/HerJack of All TradesShe/Her
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: July 14, 2021
- Pronoun: She/Her
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.