Mini 673 - Game Over!

[hasdgfas]

Right, that's me read up.

I'll lay down some opinions on people in the near future, but first a question.
Hascow, you never said who you investigated last night. Who did you investigate?

I got an innocent. Why should I reveal it?

[stark]

Right, that's me read up.

I'll lay down some opinions on people in the near future, but first a question.
Hascow, you never said who you investigated last night. Who did you investigate?

I got an innocent. Why should I reveal it?

So that if you die tonight we have on innocent...

[hasdgfas]

Right, that's me read up.

I'll lay down some opinions on people in the near future, but first a question.
Hascow, you never said who you investigated last night. Who did you investigate?

I got an innocent. Why should I reveal it?

So that if you die tonight we have on innocent...

You don't trust me to have breadcrumbed it?

[scotmany12]

So my question is if Gurgi's refusal was such an obvious scum move, why does it look like you started working so quickly to bolster your case on IH/Gurgi after Gurgi pointed out that it was lacking

I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. I looked at IHs post because Gurgi said he needed replacing, which I take as him saying he was inactive. This is not the case. IH was around the site during and before deadline. He did not switch his vote to fuzzy, and I'm going to hold this against him. Regardless this does not change the fact that Gurgi basically refused to explain his vote. When someone asks you to do something, you do it unless you have a good reason not to. Saying you didn't give good reasons for a vote so I won't even explain mine is not a good reason.

[MadCrawdad]

Regardless this does not change the fact that Gurgi basically refused to explain his vote. When someone asks you to do something, you do it unless you have a good reason not to. Saying you didn't give good reasons for a vote so I won't even explain mine is not a good reason.

The point is, that although you call his move scummy, it seems to have inspired to do some work rather quickly. For disagreeing with him, it looks like you may have been trying to indulge him afterall.

[scotmany12]

Regardless this does not change the fact that Gurgi basically refused to explain his vote. When someone asks you to do something, you do it unless you have a good reason not to. Saying you didn't give good reasons for a vote so I won't even explain mine is not a good reason.

The point is, that although you call his move scummy, it seems to have inspired to do some work rather quickly. For disagreeing with him, it looks like you may have been trying to indulge him afterall.

You really aren't making much sense right now. At all.

[Simenon]

Sim, who's scum?

I'll get to this within five days. Please give me leave for my awful schedule.

[stark]

Right, that's me read up.

I'll lay down some opinions on people in the near future, but first a question.
Hascow, you never said who you investigated last night. Who did you investigate?

I got an innocent. Why should I reveal it?

So that if you die tonight we have on innocent...

You don't trust me to have breadcrumbed it?

Or you can just tell us..

[Lord Gurgi]

Regardless this does not change the fact that Gurgi basically refused to explain his vote. When someone asks you to do something, you do it unless you have a good reason not to. Saying you didn't give good reasons for a vote so I won't even explain mine is not a good reason.

The point is, that although you call his move scummy, it seems to have inspired to do some work rather quickly. For disagreeing with him, it looks like you may have been trying to indulge him afterall.

You really aren't making much sense right now. At all.

It makes perfect sense. Suddenly you add more to your argument as soon as I say it sucks. Even now, it's pretty horrible, but the point is, that you only sought out information once you had to.

In other news, I favour hascow coming out with his investigation.

[hasdgfas]

Right, that's me read up.

I'll lay down some opinions on people in the near future, but first a question.
Hascow, you never said who you investigated last night. Who did you investigate?

I got an innocent. Why should I reveal it?

So that if you die tonight we have on innocent...

You don't trust me to have breadcrumbed it?

Or you can just tell us..

How does me coming straight out and telling you help the town any more than me having breadcrumbed it when:
A) We don't know if I'll die tonight
B) Sanity isn't confirmed
C) it probably tells scum my sanity and may give them another target to go after

[scotmany12]

Regardless this does not change the fact that Gurgi basically refused to explain his vote. When someone asks you to do something, you do it unless you have a good reason not to. Saying you didn't give good reasons for a vote so I won't even explain mine is not a good reason.

The point is, that although you call his move scummy, it seems to have inspired to do some work rather quickly. For disagreeing with him, it looks like you may have been trying to indulge him afterall.

You really aren't making much sense right now. At all.

It makes perfect sense. Suddenly you add more to your argument as soon as I say it sucks. Even now, it's pretty horrible, but the point is, that you only sought out information once you had to.

I didn't add anything new. You simply misread it as me voting for IH because he needed replacement, which was never the case. And instead of saying that it sucks, how bout you explain why it sucks. And you still have not explained your vote on sim. I can't understand why you would refuse to do this if you were town.

[Lord Gurgi]

Regardless this does not change the fact that Gurgi basically refused to explain his vote. When someone asks you to do something, you do it unless you have a good reason not to. Saying you didn't give good reasons for a vote so I won't even explain mine is not a good reason.

The point is, that although you call his move scummy, it seems to have inspired to do some work rather quickly. For disagreeing with him, it looks like you may have been trying to indulge him afterall.

You really aren't making much sense right now. At all.

It makes perfect sense. Suddenly you add more to your argument as soon as I say it sucks. Even now, it's pretty horrible, but the point is, that you only sought out information once you had to.

I didn't add anything new. You simply misread it as me voting for IH because he needed replacement, which was never the case. And instead of saying that it sucks, how bout you explain why it sucks. And you still have not explained your vote on sim. I can't understand why you would refuse to do this if you were town.

Why would I do it as scum?

[scotmany12]

Because you don't actually have a reason for your vote, and you can't simply switch it since someone questioned you about it?

[strife220]

How does me coming straight out and telling you help the town any more than me having breadcrumbed it when:
B) Sanity isn't confirmed

This is a mini-normal. Why would you question your sanity?

[Lord Gurgi]

Because you don't actually have a reason for your vote, and you can't simply switch it since someone questioned you about it?

I don't see how that answers the question of

why

, but more why

not

.

[stark]

Right, that's me read up.

I'll lay down some opinions on people in the near future, but first a question.
Hascow, you never said who you investigated last night. Who did you investigate?

I got an innocent. Why should I reveal it?

So that if you die tonight we have on innocent...

You don't trust me to have breadcrumbed it?

Or you can just tell us..

How does me coming straight out and telling you help the town any more than me having breadcrumbed it when:
A) We don't know if I'll die tonight
B) Sanity isn't confirmed
C) it probably tells scum my sanity and may give them another target to go after

A) If you were mafia, you wouldn't kill claimed cop?
B) That's silly in this kind of game
C) See point B

[hasdgfas]

How does me coming straight out and telling you help the town any more than me having breadcrumbed it when:
B) Sanity isn't confirmed

This is a mini-normal. Why would you question your sanity?

mini normal doesn't mean sane. Differing sanities definitely fit normal.

@stark: fine. If a majority of people want me to come right out and say it, I will, but if you can't figure it out, you fail. My roommate was looking over my shoulder as I was reading through the game, and when he saw one of my posts, he immediately said "you have an innocent on him, don't you?"

[stark]

I'm pretty sure I have a good idea of who you investigated, but better that we make sure than guess wrong.

[Lord Gurgi]

Hi.

[strife220]

I'm pretty sure I have a good idea of who you investigated, but better that we make sure than guess wrong.

I think he's only mentioned one name since he said he breadcrumbed..

[scotmany12]

Hi.

Still waiting for you reasons for your sim vote.

[Simenon]

Still here. I'll get a post up by tomorrow.

[strife220]

Might as well

Unvote

.
Wonder if I had a back-up theory ...

IH got replaced because he was slacking in this as well as all his other games, correct?

[strife220]

"Display all posts by Lorg Gurgi" leads me to

Vote: Gurgi

First 6 or 7 posts he made are aggressively scummy and unhelpful. Replacing into a game without seeming to have read anything - no case, no theory, just straight into attacking without cause.

[MadCrawdad]

In addition to Gurgi not giving a reason for his vote, neither has Flameaxe (unless Scot's sexuality really could really have a correlation with his role assignment).

In looking back through all of Flameaxe's posts, I tend to agree with Sim that Flameaxe has been somewhat of a non-entity this game.

@Gurgi & Flameaxe

With a deadline approaching, reasons for your votes would probably be helpful now. Mind sharing?