Really? Because there are a lot of ambiguities I have not seen answered.
Yes, and one in particular is how hasty people are to get vote happy when certain things have not been discussed to the fullest.
ex: Someone mentioned how a scum would avoid a particular lynch method, or WIFOM vote for their lynch method that is sure to kill them. Right? Wasn't this brought up? Well, did anyone ask if scum REALLY know what it is that they would be more susceptible to? If there are different lynch methods, then why would scum be privy to such information beforehand in a voting scheme? Answer that one and you get a million ducks!
Why did you vote Moses, citing as your evidence for voting him a bandwagon/pressure vote, when Moses had no votes at the time, and you didn't give any reason for wanting to pressure Moses?
As I recall, I was the SECOND vote on Moses and it was purely random, again, but I mentioned I didn't want to sound redundant later because it would appear scummy. But if someone throws in their little tid-bit about 'WIFOM'
someone
my get nitpicky and have a hay-day with it.
Why did you unvote him after nothing had happened?
No particular reason. I just wanted to mention Riceballtail's ability to stay behind the scenes and at the same time be omnipresent throughout the thread...its either a good scum tactic, or a strong pro town power role being conservative...you take your pick.
Why did you arbitrarily commend RBT's play when it has not been all the great in the opinions of other players? Why RBT specifically, why at the time, what specifically (i.e. examples) about his play has been good?
Read above.
Why do you ask me for discourse when you don't provide it yourself? Why do you accuse me of lynching you with no evidence when you claim that I have said stuff (but it's already been explained)?
What did I need to provide to anyone when I was asking the questions that no one seemed to be answering (I'm talking to the people who have votes on me).
So far, Your evidence against me is that I
1) random vote
2) unvote a lynch method
3) mention a player's playing abilities
4) hammer me for my mason partner when its purely not even needed
5) Ask me for a specific role in which I was PMed and I ANSWERED
6) And still think I have not answered anything to the fullest.
I'm here. I've answered questions. I don't believe I deserve so many votes. The only people who have constantly badgered me for information are armlx and Save the Dragons...the other voters on my person have not said a word! Whats the deal?
The claim for having a mason and NOT knowing the other mason's alignment bugs me.
Yes, I mentioned this because I was not going to jump right in and say 'OMG I HAVE THE SAME ROLE' I wanted to test the water with the people who claimed to have the same ability I did. Why can I not do this? If armlx and CarnCarn ARE really masons, why not speculate about the ability to see if its true what they are saying? That's what you guys seem to have done to me, no; speculating as to whether I am lying or not?
Your role PM better say that your buddy is confirmed, or I'm probably not taking my vote off you. I'm not really sure how you can be bugged by someone having your own role.
It doesn't have to appeal to you. It is strict in the fact that I am a 'neighbor' and my mason's alignment is unknown. If you're going to make up other things about my role email, then you might as well throw an 'OMGUS' at me as well! :p
This really bothers me in context of things you've you said.
Read above...I've explained it that I was merely speculating because I thought it strange that multiple mason groups would exist...wouldn't you be a tad suspicious seeing this (mason partners, alignment unknown, restricted to night talking)? It seemed to much of a coincidence right? But maybe there are multiple mason groups...maybe there aren't. All I can say is that I believe armlx and CarnCarn.
I agree with armlx here. Now that Santos has already 'revealed' that he's a mason, he already has a higher chance of being NK'ed. If there isn't a third mason it doesn't matter if Santos reveals or doesn't reveal his partner as Santos can get NK'ed and his partner changes in a normal townie.
I would like to know who his partner is. If his partner can confirm that they are masons, then we at least know there's another mason group. Now there's still a chance of him lying.
IMO, this seems to demand a lot more than you need to know, especially since you think I should be NK'd. And where do you get the idea of 'confirmations'? As I see it, there are TWO mason groups claimed on the table...myself and CarnCarn/armlx...right? (thinking about it...i may have armlx mentioned, but it could be someone else...i don't remember who CarnCarn said was his mason). Anways, couldn't it be possible that a Sicilian might be a mason with a townie and a Corsican might be a mason with another townie? So how does lynching me confirm anything of my mason partner? All that would do is either:
A) Prove that my other mason partner is scum when I am revealed townie
B) Prove nothing at all that my other mason is scum because he could be townie as well. The whole predicament is whether we need to 'Choose Carefully' IN OUR ASSUMPTIONS!
I have a feel that because Santos's partner hasn't stepped up, he is probably just scum and no buddy wants to be linked like that.
This makes a good point. So I will mentioned his name for my own sake (hopefully) and for your sake if you're going to lynch me and go into the night knowing that you lynched me, but never got my mason's name. (oEJo)
I want this over with as this is only distracting.
I believe you are just being a hasty scum, amirite?
Not to mention that he hasn't answered any of the other questions that have been posed to him.
Let me know if I missed any.
[url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/independent/thecrazies/]zombie - The Crazies[/url]
[url=http://www.erepublik.com/en/referrer/GreekHoplite]Join me in eRepublik![/url]
