End of Page 4. Tar, I honestly think you call IIoA too quickly. However, I do agree that not taking a stance is incredibly scummy, even this early. You can at least have suspicions, even if you aren't voting. KE also loses more points for some convoluted WIFOM about how he is town and voting town makes you suspect. LOL WUT? Honestly, at this point I'd vote him, also for sidestepping tar's question. Timeater also sidestepped Tar's question by attacking the way Tar was attacking him. They both are worthy of FoS'.
Also
Too scummy is rarely a true tell. Well, except in my case and a few other players on this site. Those players aren't playing far as I can tell, so you really can't use too scummy to clear someone.
I don't know about this. I really doubt that anyone would be dumb enough to defend their scumbuddy so early in the game.
Honestly Tim, fark is right. Tar asked YOU, not everyone. To be fair, he SHOULD have asked everyone though.
We call this OMGUS unless you have a good case, but let me finish this post...and the rest of the post is basically deflection. Tim, you are higher than KE now on scumminess.
Anyway I guess I better get down to the dirty business of attacking Farkshinsoup and defending myself!
KE, use names. Don't describe people by actions. I can also argue against two out of your three points of what makes someone suspect.
KE, your Tim case sucks. Write a real one. You are catching up to Tim now for scumminess. Oh, Elmo hasn't said much more objectionable since page 3, so I'm not as worried about her.
Fark, don't evade. You just accused Tim of this. Don't be a hypocrite, even if it was deflection. You have nothing to hide as town, so go with it. And then address concerns. A few notches up on scumminess here.
Tim, post 116. IIRC, you still haven't answered the questions yourself. Quit the hypocrisy.
IAUN gets townie points. Good pointing out of the hypocrisy.
Post 120. Null at best, possibly slightly scummy, but I end up getting people in dilemmas with this. Essentially, you conformed to look townie by answering without providing reasoning for either your initial obstinance or your switch besides someone asked. No townie points here.
Once again afraid of a stance? If you suspect someone, vote. Not voting won't summon people to talk.Whats this mean, you basically will follow votes and join a wagon if the critical suspicion mass on KE reaches its teetering point? I dont like that. Please clarify if thats not what you meant. Also, I dont see how this information, as you claim, is disingenuous. Can you point out how I am not being sincere here? [/qote]
Strawman. It's obvious he means he's still thinking about it, not that he's waiting for bandwagon. More scum points for you Tim.
Anyway, on another note - I'm witholding my vote until I hear from more people, especially Tar. And why does it feel like Fark and I are the only ones talking?
MacCavity: I might have missed it. Where is this tim/Elmo link that Fark is pushing?
Elmo, maybe I'm biased since you voted my predecessor, but there is a LOT of fodder for scumhunting. Why the lurker vote? At least read.
Tim. I agree with your vote. I disagree with your reasons and preface. You are jumping for the anyone but you lynch. And not backing up your votes very well. Slight scum tell.
KE: The repetition of x vs. x makes me feel that's a null tell for fark. I'd prefer to have a better meta read on him for that however.
Tim: This is weird. I thought you were going to push him hard. But what's more puzzling is that his response wasn't that elucidating. I would either think possible bus attempt. Especially given the weak reason for revoting Fark before he's even posted anything else after you "LEt him off for good behavior"
Very good PBPA by Tar. I agree with it.
Tim: why is it weak and contrived? Counter PBPA him. We aren't going to take your word for it. Furthermore, why do you have to be asked? Even if they are time consuming they are a part of mafia. Do it on your own or it looks like you are trying to look townie.
Iam: Precisely my thoughts, actually. Tim/KE is a very plausible pair given that interaction. Also, I know you asked Tar, but personally, your play is different than it was in that ongoing where you were scum. You aren't leading anyone, you are actaully asking balanced questions to scum hunt.
In the end, my suspects are:
And...least certain but still suspect,
Sorry about the wall of text, I needed to organize my thoughts.