Open 86 - Lovers Multiball (Game Over)


User avatar
Raging Rabbit
Raging Rabbit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raging Rabbit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1719
Joined: January 18, 2007

Post Post #2450 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 4:18 am

Post by Raging Rabbit »

Can we hear that other case you had on armlx/SP that convinced Darox so well now?
User avatar
SleepyPanda
SleepyPanda
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyPanda
Goon
Goon
Posts: 527
Joined: May 7, 2008
Location: Pandaland~

Post Post #2451 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 4:22 am

Post by SleepyPanda »

charter wrote:
Knight of Cydonia wrote:Because apparently we're not playing Mafia, we're playing TimeStamp.
Oh, who didn't want to post the times? Oh that was Charter? Stop whining about it.
Sometimes I wonder if you are actually being serious.
destructor wrote: DarlaBlueEyes hasn't posted in over 48 hours and will be replaced. =/
DBE hasn't posted in 4 days shy of
a month
, not just 48 hours. About time, I say.
DrippingGoofball wrote:Ah! I get it. The time that the QT was started. Well I have 10:07, too.

Thus we should lynch armlx/Panda.

Not charter. At least, there is no reason to lynch charter yet. Note that both armlx and SleepyPanda are voting against charter.

Two more votes on Panda, please.
And why is it of note that we are voting charter? Charter has been scummy for a long time. We were voting charter even before this timestamp business. I don't know where you're going with that.

You still have not given any reason to not vote charter. What did you say to convince Darox? Why won't you tell everyone else? Are you going to continue telling everyone to stop voting charter and at the same time keep stalling on your reasons for doing so?
User avatar
charter
charter
Beware of Dog
User avatar
User avatar
charter
Beware of Dog
Beware of Dog
Posts: 9261
Joined: July 12, 2007
Location: Virginia

Post Post #2452 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 4:31 am

Post by charter »

SleepyPanda wrote:You still have not given any reason to not vote charter.
Scumlogic.
User avatar
SleepyPanda
SleepyPanda
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyPanda
Goon
Goon
Posts: 527
Joined: May 7, 2008
Location: Pandaland~

Post Post #2453 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 4:51 am

Post by SleepyPanda »

charter wrote:
SleepyPanda wrote:You still have not given any reason to not vote charter.
Scumlogic.
And this is an attempt at strawmanning.

Someone is scummy. Someone else says don't vote them. So the first person should unvote automatically? Because they were told to? Please. You play a better game by just repeating we're scum constantly.
User avatar
charter
charter
Beware of Dog
User avatar
User avatar
charter
Beware of Dog
Beware of Dog
Posts: 9261
Joined: July 12, 2007
Location: Virginia

Post Post #2454 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 5:33 am

Post by charter »

This isn't a guilty until proven innocent game. You don't start out voting everyone and then removing votes one by one until you're down to voting one person. Therefore, you do the opposite, and wait until you're convinced someone is guilty, then vote for that person. I don't know why I'm explaining this, you don't have to give reasons for not voting someone. Obviously the explanation is you don't think they are scum.
User avatar
Raging Rabbit
Raging Rabbit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raging Rabbit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1719
Joined: January 18, 2007

Post Post #2455 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 5:42 am

Post by Raging Rabbit »

You do if that person is acting scummy as hell and is everyone's top suspect. Tons of reasons why you're scummy have been provided, DGB has yet to show why she thinks they don't apply.
User avatar
SleepyPanda
SleepyPanda
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyPanda
Goon
Goon
Posts: 527
Joined: May 7, 2008
Location: Pandaland~

Post Post #2456 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 5:44 am

Post by SleepyPanda »

charter wrote:Obviously the explanation is you don't think they are scum.
Continue strawmanning.

I think you're scum, and have been saying so for quite some time. Darox recently said DGB has a compelling case that you are not. What are you having trouble understanding? If DGB has a case that proves you are not scum, why should I not be asking to hear what it is?
I don't know why I'm explaining this
zzzz.
User avatar
armlx
armlx
Most JDTay-like
User avatar
User avatar
armlx
Most JDTay-like
Most JDTay-like
Posts: 13500
Joined: February 25, 2005

Post Post #2457 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:25 am

Post by armlx »

This isn't a guilty until proven innocent game.
Actually, it is.

Also, DGB
destructor wrote:Timestamps have no correlation with alignment.
Away Wednesday the 24th through the 31st
User avatar
charter
charter
Beware of Dog
User avatar
User avatar
charter
Beware of Dog
Beware of Dog
Posts: 9261
Joined: July 12, 2007
Location: Virginia

Post Post #2458 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:53 am

Post by charter »

armlx wrote:Also, DGB
destructor wrote:Timestamps have no correlation with alignment.
And lynching you will prove or disprove that beyond a doubt. Besides, you're guilty because you haven't proven yourself innocent. See how dumb that is?
User avatar
armlx
armlx
Most JDTay-like
User avatar
User avatar
armlx
Most JDTay-like
Most JDTay-like
Posts: 13500
Joined: February 25, 2005

Post Post #2459 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:13 am

Post by armlx »

And lynching you will prove or disprove that beyond a doubt. Besides, you're guilty because you haven't proven yourself innocent. See how dumb that is?
Its not that dumb. See, you are more guilty, and I've shown logically why.

Do you seriously start each game assuming everyone is innocent?

And again, to the first part, that's just dumb. The default assumption is NEVER that the mod is lying.
Away Wednesday the 24th through the 31st
User avatar
charter
charter
Beware of Dog
User avatar
User avatar
charter
Beware of Dog
Beware of Dog
Posts: 9261
Joined: July 12, 2007
Location: Virginia

Post Post #2460 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:37 am

Post by charter »

Well, my reasons for voting you were, and still are, your buddying up and your terrible voting record. I say that makes you scummier than my not wanting to post daytalk, not wanting to massclaim, and giving up on the game for a while.
User avatar
Cephrir
Cephrir
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Cephrir
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 25301
Joined: October 11, 2006
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Seattle-ish

Post Post #2461 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:45 am

Post by Cephrir »

armlx wrote:Do you seriously start each game assuming everyone is innocent?
Do you seriously start each game assuming everyone is guilty?
"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,
Bartleby the Scrivener
User avatar
Knight of Cydonia
Knight of Cydonia
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Knight of Cydonia
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3482
Joined: June 23, 2008

Post Post #2462 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:06 am

Post by Knight of Cydonia »

Charter... not so much. Considering that you've done most of what you're accusing armlx of, I'd say you're still scummiest.
User avatar
Raging Rabbit
Raging Rabbit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raging Rabbit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1719
Joined: January 18, 2007

Post Post #2463 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:46 am

Post by Raging Rabbit »

I'd restate all the reasons why charter is scummy as hell, but I don't think it'd help any. This 6-6 with Crazy leaning towards SP looks like a deadlock to me. Would still really like to hear from DGB about her mysterious case, and hopefully DBE will be replaced before deadline.
User avatar
armlx
armlx
Most JDTay-like
User avatar
User avatar
armlx
Most JDTay-like
Most JDTay-like
Posts: 13500
Joined: February 25, 2005

Post Post #2464 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:56 am

Post by armlx »

Do you seriously start each game assuming everyone is guilty?
I assume anyone can be at the start.
Away Wednesday the 24th through the 31st
User avatar
Crazy
Crazy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Crazy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4435
Joined: May 6, 2008
Location: Somewhere

Post Post #2465 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:04 am

Post by Crazy »

Screw it.

Unvote, Vote: SleepyPanda


Because I don't want to wait another week until someone's deadline-lynched.
User avatar
charter
charter
Beware of Dog
User avatar
User avatar
charter
Beware of Dog
Beware of Dog
Posts: 9261
Joined: July 12, 2007
Location: Virginia

Post Post #2466 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:25 am

Post by charter »

Knight of Cydonia wrote:Charter... not so much. Considering that you've done most of what you're accusing armlx of, I'd say you're still scummiest.
Where have I buddied up? Where have I been on all the townie lynches?
User avatar
armlx
armlx
Most JDTay-like
User avatar
User avatar
armlx
Most JDTay-like
Most JDTay-like
Posts: 13500
Joined: February 25, 2005

Post Post #2467 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:26 am

Post by armlx »

Where have I buddied up?
Whenever someone even comes close to agreeing with you, you get all excited and post more. Whenever someone attacks you, you OMGUS.
Away Wednesday the 24th through the 31st
User avatar
SleepyPanda
SleepyPanda
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyPanda
Goon
Goon
Posts: 527
Joined: May 7, 2008
Location: Pandaland~

Post Post #2468 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:36 am

Post by SleepyPanda »

I'm going to go ahead and say this is quite sad. Please tell me how we're scum with how we've played. Armlx was one of the first, if not the first, to say that Crazy was confirmed town. Last time I checked, scum want people dead, not call people confirmed townies. I've been wanting DBE replaced for a long time. WWB managed to convince the mod to let her stay, and what use was it? We were stuck with a useless player for a month. How does trying to get a person who isn't contributing replaced suppose to benefit scum? With CWR and his not posting daytalk, I was probably one of the most staunch people to oppose lynching him on that alone. Granted it was the right move, I felt it was a bit too premature to lynch only based on that. How does trying to prevent an easy lynch helpful to scum? If you want to say we're their mafia partners, go ahead. But I'm sure the same people who would say this are also voting us based on the timestamps theory, which would imply that we are not mafia, but werewolves. I see no reason for one scum faction to defend another. I've also been oppose to his lynch prior to the timestamp theory being made public, so if we are indeed werewolves, we have no knowledge that they are mafia.

With how lazy most of this town is, I'm sure you'll all have tons of fun trying to find the rest of scum. If we are lynched, I'm still recommending everyone look at charter/Ceph pair. Besides them, the most likely scum pair I believe are WWB/RR or sekinj/neko, and possibly Darox/DGB for how they've played recently.
User avatar
SleepyPanda
SleepyPanda
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyPanda
Goon
Goon
Posts: 527
Joined: May 7, 2008
Location: Pandaland~

Post Post #2469 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:38 am

Post by SleepyPanda »

charter wrote:
Knight of Cydonia wrote:Charter... not so much. Considering that you've done most of what you're accusing armlx of, I'd say you're still scummiest.
Where have I buddied up? Where have I been on all the townie lynches?
You haven't been on all townie lynches, but Cephrir has. Where are you going with it? I'm so sick of your ridiculously horrible logic.
User avatar
charter
charter
Beware of Dog
User avatar
User avatar
charter
Beware of Dog
Beware of Dog
Posts: 9261
Joined: July 12, 2007
Location: Virginia

Post Post #2470 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:39 am

Post by charter »

This will be so much more satisfying once we're down to looking for one last pair.
User avatar
Raging Rabbit
Raging Rabbit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raging Rabbit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1719
Joined: January 18, 2007

Post Post #2471 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:47 am

Post by Raging Rabbit »

SP wrote:But I'm sure the same people who would say this are also voting us based on the timestamps theory, which would imply that we are not mafia, but werewolves.
That theory clearly implies you're mafia (same timestamp as BM), no idea where you're getting this from.
SP wrote:If we are lynched, I'm still recommending everyone look at charter/Ceph pair. Besides them, the most likely scum pair I believe are WWB/RR or sekinj/neko, and possibly Darox/DGB for how they've played recently.
That's everyone but lurkers ThAd/Darla. Not too keen.
User avatar
SleepyPanda
SleepyPanda
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyPanda
Goon
Goon
Posts: 527
Joined: May 7, 2008
Location: Pandaland~

Post Post #2472 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:55 am

Post by SleepyPanda »

Raging Rabbit wrote:
SP wrote:But I'm sure the same people who would say this are also voting us based on the timestamps theory, which would imply that we are not mafia, but werewolves.
That theory clearly implies you're mafia (same timestamp as BM), no idea where you're getting this from.
And where do you get this from? We have different times than BM. Show me otherwise.
Raging Rabbit wrote:
SP wrote:If we are lynched, I'm still recommending everyone look at charter/Ceph pair. Besides them, the most likely scum pair I believe are WWB/RR or sekinj/neko, and possibly Darox/DGB for how they've played recently.
That's everyone but lurkers ThAd/Darla. Not too keen.
I worded that wrong. I'm saying those pairs deserve more attention. Besides me, I see no one else pressuring you or WWB, practically this entire game.
User avatar
Raging Rabbit
Raging Rabbit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raging Rabbit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1719
Joined: January 18, 2007

Post Post #2473 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:06 pm

Post by Raging Rabbit »

You're right, confused you with Sej/neko. Apologies.

We've had our share of (poorly based) attacks, both from Adel/DGB and charter. Do you think not being attacked 'enough' is in any way a scumtell?
User avatar
charter
charter
Beware of Dog
User avatar
User avatar
charter
Beware of Dog
Beware of Dog
Posts: 9261
Joined: July 12, 2007
Location: Virginia

Post Post #2474 (ISO) » Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:09 pm

Post by charter »

RR, the thinking is SP and armlx have the same times as fire/ice.

Return to “Completed Large Normal Games”