Hmm, interesting question... I haven't really thought deeply about it to be quite honest. My first throw at the idea was pretty much out of left field, and I didn't really think it through. That being said, I really didn't think anyone would really push for it (the claim that is). It's a very oddball move, and I kind of only half said it to get some conversation on the topic...Mana_Ku wrote:Kinetic, what does the town gain from the win condition claim?
However, I want to try and answer your question with a little thought.
I think the main benefit the town would gain, if any, is figuring out who the town really is... And what I mean there is this: If everyone has two win conditions, or maybe even more than that, I don't know, they might not be sure exactly which one is the true town.
What if all of the "second" win conditions for the town are really just red herrings. What if they're part of a ploy so that the people who DO have two win conditions, ones that aren't pro-town, can hide and maybe even throw one of them out to distract us from a more insidious second win condition.
This is, in truth, one of the main reasons I suspect Nat. I was trying to think like Tar (tough, I know, especially since I've heard about his mind screw games. Scary Stuff). Anyway, I do have credentials of being able to out think Tar (granted, I had to kill him in that game to win, because if I left his ass alive I'm sure town would have lost... but anyway). But the conclusion I came to is that is this:
IF the scum also have two win conditions, in NO WAY can one of those win conditions be pro-town. Why? Betrayal. If a scummer has a scum win condition and a town win condition, then he can just tell the town who his scum buddies are, lynch them, and win with the town.
THUS if a scum has another win condition, that win condition must either be neutral, survivor, or scum related. I was thinking this when I was preparing to enter the game (I wanted to join from the beginning, because I was intrigued, but the game closed up before I came back to the site). When Nat basically jumped up and said "Hey, I have a 'neutral' second win condition", ... well, yea, you can put 2 and 2 together now if you want to. But that is why I wanted him to reveal his win conditions, because I wanted to see if I could get him to slip without any help from anyone else...
Granted: Town can also have neutral or survivor win conditions as well, so my thought process isn't full proof. But it is what I'm thinking.
Would you care to elaborate?DG wrote:Mind you, after reading the posts intervening between my vote yesterday, and my vote today, Kinetic's post is alarming.