In post 549, Knight Marigold wrote:
I typed my reply in the time between you posting
529 and
530. Somehow I missed the further response in the preview. Apologies. That doesn't really explain anything to me, though. You liked another post of theirs in
508 but there's been no elaboration or explanation of why you townread those posts. Can you give something more?
Sorry if I’ve been harsh to you. I didn’t intend to hurt anyone’s feelings. So I really appreciate this change in tone. I’m not really good at that and I get ragged on constantly because I’m terrible at explaining things. I understand it in my head but it’s extremely hard for me to express it. That doesn’t make me scum but I can understand fypov why you don’t consider my responses to be satisfactory. Perhaps had I not replaced in and been in the game right from the getgo, this would probably be a lot easier.
I guarantee you I will flip town and I think Magenta is sketchy af. Burgundy and Chartreuse had a wierd reaction to the warm knights. When I reasonably suggested that since I think both you and Rose are town and likely one warm scum amongst the paired slots, I didn’t like Chartreuse’s reaction to that. Could I possibly be wrong about that? Sure but in every dance game ever on this site, scum have not been all ladies, gents and it’s difficult to believe they’re all one color but Chartreuse practically took my head off for merely suggesting it, As for Burgundy, why were they hating on the rest of the warm knights? Something is really strange about both of their reactions. Also, Azure like Beige is so obviously town, yet she objected to your pairing with them. Why?
But my strongest suspicions are on Magenta who I think is > than rand flaming obvscum and Rainbow for way over the top defending her. It’s like they badly want Magenta picked and me not, which is strange to me that anyone would hard tr such an extremely scummy slot.
So when I flip, watch those four because I think at least two scum is in that group.