farside22 wrote:Post 545 is suggest that we might not be in lylo so really not up for claim.
Apart from being in the same post, my comments on mass-claiming and lynch-or-lose are not in any way related.
--
farside22 wrote:Saying that I know it is lylo also isn't a tell. I feel that is a big leap to make when anyone who's played her can tell you what I just said.
It's not at all about lynch-or-lose, but about you
knowing
when there's not enough information available to us to know. Thus, you either lied about “knowing” and are indeed just guessing or you have more information available than the rest of us.
--
farside22 wrote:Also saying I'm against mass claim but will do it is wishy washy. It's basically saying I will do it but I dont like it. How is that not wishy washy?
I never stated that I was against mass-claims. I did make a general statement about “not exactly being a fan” of them and then said that
nevertheless,
a mass-claim in this specific situation would be “apropriate.”
--
farside22 wrote:td: Do you have an issue with claiming first?
No. I do have an issue with you misrepresenting me though.
Also, interesting that you're back at the td-against-mass-claim stage, which ironic, since you seem to be
wishy-washy
there…