Mini 681 - Mish Mash Mafia - THE END!

Empking · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 4:44 am

How do I not understand the THEME part.

I read the thread.

That's why I voted Mana Ku.

sekinj · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:23 am

Empking wrote:How do I not understand the THEME part.

You didn't know we were playing the

Mish-Mash

game

Elect the Executioner

when you made your vote on Caboose. So it was obvious that you hadn't read the first several pages of the game which explain and thoroughly discuss the THEMED part of this game (playing a different mish-mash game every day).

Empking wrote:I read the thread.

That's why I voted Mana Ku.

that is great. I'm glad you are catching up.

MafiaSSK · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:35 am

Empking is acting really scummy.

Lynch:Empking

Empking · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:46 am

In the game elect the executioner, the executed can make a vengeful game?

Catch up. I voted Mana Ku in my first post.

Lynch: Sekinj

For blatant misrepresenting.

sekinj · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:33 am

Empking wrote:In the game elect the executioner, the executed can make a vengeful game?

Catch up. I voted Mana Ku in my first post.

Lynch: Sekinj

For blatant misrepresenting.

Ha! oh that is funny. Are you REALLY saying that you read the game and THEN put your vote on Caboose becuase you thought he was scummy?? So you WANT to elect a scummy executioner? you are not making ANY sense.

Caboose · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:25 am

I don't think Empking is scummy at all, his suggestion makes sense to me. He thinks that I'm scummy (I don't know why) but if I turn up town (which I will) then he puts reasonable trust in scumdar to be able to vengeful kill actual scum. He made a mistake in the mechanics and he voted for me. He should have voted for the person who would kill me.

sekinj · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:09 am

Caboose wrote:I don't think Empking is scummy at all, his suggestion makes sense to me. He thinks that I'm scummy (I don't know why) but if I turn up town (which I will) then he puts reasonable trust in scumdar to be able to vengeful kill actual scum. He made a mistake in the mechanics and he voted for me. He should have voted for the person who would kill me.

Right. and now he is voting to lynch me because I pointed out that he should have known the game mechanics by this time, and it shoudl not have taken 2 people most of a page to re-explain it.

Caboose · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:29 am

Being confused about the mechanics =/= scummy

sekinj · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:35 am

Caboose wrote:Being confused about the mechanics =/= scummy

which is one reason I never voted to lynch him. however, his continued assertion that he was never mistaken IS scummy.

letsbefriends · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:07 am

Knight of Cydonia wrote:
Vote: Mana_Ku
, as she seems to be the only person here with two working eyes and some brain cells left dedicated to reading comprehension.

Can you explain why you are voting Mana?

Mana_Ku wrote:At this point, I will not vote Caboose, KoC or Letsbefriends.
Caboose his idea can be seen as WIFOM to vote him.
KoC has really strange posts.
Letsbefriends is again WIFOM. Does he say he doesn't want to kill to appear pro-town or does he really mean it.

At this point from what I've seen, I'm having doubts between Sekinj and RestFermata. Therefor I'll Vote Sekinj as I can agree with her thoughts most of the time.

Mana is just labeling things as WIFOM, using that as a "reason" for not voting that person. She isn't voting Caboose for suggesting that we say who we want the executioner to kill because it COULD be WIFOM. If you're going to look at it that way, everything can be intrepreted as WIFOM. In fact, sekinj did something extremely similar by suggesting that not only do we say who we want to elect and lynch, but also shoot, and yet Mana doesn't label it as WIFOM and instead places a vote on her for executioner. What is different from what sekinj and Caboose's idea?

Tovarish · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:38 am

^QFT

How could Caboose's idea be WIFOM, isn't binding to somebody else reducing WIFOM?

Caboose · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:55 pm

KoC wrote:Vote: Mana_Ku, as she seems to be the only person here with two working eyes and some brain cells left dedicated to reading comprehension.

FoS: KoC

For using an ad hom argument, which I personally take exception to.

FoS: Mana Ku

For labelling my idea WIFOM when it is clearly not. She also labelled Letsbefriends as WIFOM when s/he is clearly not.

sekinj · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:59 pm

Vote: Shadowgirl

She seems reasonable.

orangepenguin · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:37 pm

Wow. I only got my role pm, never got a link to the thread. Well, just read. I trust sekinj the most. Just based off of playing with her before and everything. So I want her to be executioner.

Vote: sekinj

Empking · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:04 pm

sekinj wrote:
Empking wrote:In the game elect the executioner, the executed can make a vengeful game?

Catch up. I voted Mana Ku in my first post.

Lynch: Sekinj

For blatant misrepresenting.
Ha! oh that is funny. Are you REALLY saying that you read the game and THEN put your vote on Caboose becuase you thought he was scummy?? So you WANT to elect a scummy executioner? you are not making ANY sense.

How do you explain that I voted Mana Ku first?

I shouldn't of went for your lynch though.

Lynch; Caboose

Mana_Ku · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:41 pm

Note: LetsBeFriends and Caboose backing eachother up.
I explained at page 2 why I saw Caboose's idea as WIFOM. No comment from both Caboose or LetsBeFriends. When i repeat it and add my thoughts about why I will not vote KoC or LBF, Caboose starts about it. LBF gives no comments. At page 6, I give the same explanation why I won't vote Caboose. Then at page 7, LBF gives a comment about it. Caboose's next post is in agreement with LBF's post.
Reason for my note: LBF starts way to late with commenting about my thought about Caboose's idea. He starts commenting after Caboose started giving comments. Caboose in his next post FoSes me as LBF isn't WIFOM according to him. However, Sekinj also showed that she didn't trust this from LBF.
Both only gave comments after the other. If I'm chosen, I'll shoot one of them.

Sekinj is expanding the thoughts of Caboose. That's the difference between the two. She didn't come up with the idea, Caboose did.

letsbefriends · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:49 pm

I comment on your post because of KoC's vote on you. I didn't pay as much attention the first time around. If someone votes for you, I'd like to see why.

You haven't explained why you labeled Caboose's idea as WIFOM and not sekinj's, as well as going a step further and also voting her. Can you tell me what is different from their ideas?

letsbefriends · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:51 pm

Err, missed the last sentence. You do realize that sekinj has agreed with Caboose on his orginal idea, as well as

improved

it?

Mana_Ku · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:51 pm

You asked what the difference was between the ideas of Caboose and Sekinj.
See my previous post for that answer.

letsbefriends · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:56 pm

Why do you consider proposing an idea WIFOM while agreeing with one is not? Do you think that no one should share any ideas?

Max · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:04 am

Vote Count "Laughing on the way to your execution is not generally understood by less-advanced life forms, and

they

call you crazy":

ShadowGirl (2): MafiaSSK, sekinj
Mana_Ku (2): Empking, Knight of Cydonia
sekinj (2): Mana_Ku, orangepenguin

letsbefriends (1): ShadowGirl
Empking (1): Tovarish
Knight of Cydonia (1): Caboose

Tovarish
orangepenguin
lord_hur
MafiaSSK
RestFermata
Caboose

Not Voting (3): letsbefriends, lord_hur, RestFermata

Mana_Ku · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:13 am

Mana wrote:I won't vote Caboose, that's a given.
By suggesting that idea, it seems as if he's pro-town
. I saw a game at the marathon day, where someone who also suggested an idea was the bad guy. This is a clear case of WIFOM.

See here why i believe proposing this idea is WIFOM. This is why it's not WIFOM to agree with it.

State every idea you want. It's good for town as it leads to discussion. However, there are ideas which i won't agree with or which I don't trust. Just like now.

Also, why don't you want to be the executioner?

letsbefriends · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:24 am

Because killing is bad.

And since you have a higher chance of not living till Day 2. If you hit scum, you probably become the most confirmed town (go ahead, I know what you want to say) and thus more likely to be killed by the one-shot.

Do you agree with the vote/lynch/shoot system? You're saying Caboose's idea makes it seem like he's pro-town which sounds like you think the idea would benefit town, yet you haven't given your opinion on it yet.

letsbefriends · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:29 am

Mana_Ku wrote: I saw a game at the marathon day, where someone who also suggested an idea was the bad guy.

Can you also show me which game it is you're referring to here?

Mana_Ku · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:40 am

I actually don't like your second reason. Does it matter if you're dead day 2 when you've hit scum day 1? You should do anything you can do to get scum down even if it means you're own life as you (if you're town) win when town wins.

I don't have anything against it. Why do you otherwise think that I have already announced who I'll kill?

I have to look for that game as I have no idea which one it was. But my friend was in it so I'll ask her.