Mini 659: The Neighborhood- Game over on Day 6
-
-
pickemgenius Jack the Tripper
- Jack the Tripper
- Jack the Tripper
- Posts: 2471
- Joined: April 27, 2007
- Location: Pepsi Center
supShowRumpelstiltskin Grinder
(1:55:11 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's ok drench
(1:55:21 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's perfectly normal for young children to walk in on their parents making love
(1:55:31 AM) Drench394: i can't wait
STREAMING:
www.twitch.tv/xxxpickemgenius-
-
bionicchop2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: March 12, 2008
-
-
gorckat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: January 17, 2007
- Location: Bawlmer, Hon!
**LOL- almost forgot to announce the major carrot in getting peg to replace in:
The##voteformat is suspended. FWIW, I felt getting a live body into the game was more important at this point than sticking my heels in on the subject.
You may use ## if you wish to, but all I am looking for from this post on is a bolded vote as follows:
vote:person
The colon is optional.
The rules are being updated accordingly.**
**Darox has been prodded for the second time**-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
-
-
pickemgenius Jack the Tripper
- Jack the Tripper
- Jack the Tripper
- Posts: 2471
- Joined: April 27, 2007
- Location: Pepsi Center
gorckat wrote:**LOL- almost forgot to announce the major carrot in getting peg to replace in:
The##voteformat is suspended. FWIW, I felt getting a live body into the game was more important at this point than sticking my heels in on the subject.
You may use ## if you wish to, but all I am looking for from this post on is a bolded vote as follows:
vote:person
The colon is optional.
The rules are being updated accordingly.**
**Darox has been prodded for the second time**
lol i'm such an ass!
i'll post something nice later tonightShowRumpelstiltskin Grinder
(1:55:11 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's ok drench
(1:55:21 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's perfectly normal for young children to walk in on their parents making love
(1:55:31 AM) Drench394: i can't wait
STREAMING:
www.twitch.tv/xxxpickemgenius-
-
M4yhem Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: August 3, 2006
Damn, I didn't even get to use that format.
I'm still rereading, up to page 16. My suspicion of bionicchop has disappeared and I'm starting to think Crywolf is newbie town. Darox shoots up the list to take the top place; at this point I really think he's scum.
The 'neutral' confused me, as well as a lot of other players. There are no neutrals, there's town and anti-town. Why vote for someone you see as neutral, not scummy?Darox wrote:Explanation: I don't think Lowell is town.
I think he is neutral with a disruptive playstyle, which comes off as scummy.
Things I don't like about Lowell. Fishing for role claims day one. 100% belief in miller claim. Case on tony.
Good summary. I agree with this completely.iamausername wrote: Darox proposed a policy lynch to "correct" Lowell's behaviour in future games, and when people pointed out that this is a terrible idea if we want to winthisgame, he completely changed his story. It's backtracking, plain and simple. And I think that's a scummy reaction.
This is a complete and total overreaction. Someone's feeling the pressure, I think.Darox wrote:If only I had a dayvig.
I FIND LOWELL SCUMMY, LIKE I HAVE SAID SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE. HOWEVER, I THINK THIS COULD JUST BE BECAUSE OF HIS PLAYING STYLE, WHICH I FIND IS ANTI TOWN. I USED THE WORD NEUTRAL INTENTIONALLY BECAUSE IT DISPLAYS MY MIXED FEELINGS ON LOWELL.
What is wrong with someone being put at L-1, exactly?
Ras 225
This seems like coaching and also a subtle defence.Rashiminos wrote: Darox needs to use clearer language to reduce these misunderstandings that provide legitimate reasons for why his posts are "misrepresented."
I didn't like his reason for voting Darox (for unvoting Lowell) and I like his unvote even less; it sounds fabricated.fhqwhgads wrote:##unvote; ##vote:Lowell
My vote on Darox was obviously because I miscounted (still, IGMEOY). Lowell's not interested in playing along, and we're not getting anything more out of him while he's still alive.
I suggest we lynch.
This is blatent misrepresentation.Darox wrote:Can someone try to summarize the case against me?
So far all I have got is that not unvoting when someone is at L-1 is somehow morally wrong, and unvoting when someone starts calling for an immediate hammer is clearly the move of a dirty sleaze.
This is obviously a joke, so tell me. What is the real case against me?
This came straight after Crywolf's 312. It seemed totally unjustified and I wonder what Oman was smoking.Oman wrote:Crywolf is looking scummier and scummier, its like she's stumbling around looking for a handle on this. Still, lowell today pluz
Also, what makes you so sure Darox is town, Oman? He seems scummy as f*** to me.
I don't like Elias's 'I'll look into them tomorrow' post. Did he ever look at the people he said he'd look at?
Don't much like Rash but don't have any cocrete reasons why; I'll pay attention to him from now on.
Fos:DaroxIt would be a vote but maybe the next nine pages will change my read on you.
I'll have that reread finished by tomorrow and a vote in time for deadline.-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Hey still here.. I was workin on a post when my internet conked out and froze my comp up to no end. Its not at 100% yet but it will be after the cable comes in and gives me a new modem (i've had no luck with those things).
Post will be comming tomorow.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
pickemgenius Jack the Tripper
- Jack the Tripper
- Jack the Tripper
- Posts: 2471
- Joined: April 27, 2007
- Location: Pepsi Center
ok so im about to do my hi! here is my awesome analysis post.
things to note
1. I will do it in three different parts 1-8 8-16 16-24
2. I will say things that people have already said before more than likely.
3. I might say things about dead people, if I do ignore it.ShowRumpelstiltskin Grinder
(1:55:11 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's ok drench
(1:55:21 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's perfectly normal for young children to walk in on their parents making love
(1:55:31 AM) Drench394: i can't wait
STREAMING:
www.twitch.tv/xxxpickemgenius-
-
pickemgenius Jack the Tripper
- Jack the Tripper
- Jack the Tripper
- Posts: 2471
- Joined: April 27, 2007
- Location: Pepsi Center
PAGES 1-12 (others coming tomorrow) deal with it.
Don't care to much for the votes on IAUN early on. Bionics vote stands out the most of the early three. Unvote looks forced...
I really don't care much for post #26 by crywolf...
post #28 by bionic seems like taking a radical 360 on his stance in the matter of a few posts. hmm
post #32 by Ythill seems like alot of regurgitated info, and nothing really new...
post #34 by Darox seems umm
Diggin #36 by fhqwhgads
#38(Darox) is heh..
#41(fhq) last line is meh.
I so dig Lowell and am pissed you guys lynched him <3 Lowell.
Tony shrugs off Lowells post in #48
Dislike #52(cry)
Dig Elias' post #53
bionics post #54 response to Elias (first response) is absolute crap.
Elias is treating this game like a noobie game in #55
bionics #56 is more BS. blah....
Tonys #62 woulda been(by me), and probably shouldve been smacked by elias(who im presuming has played with Lowell) but it wasnt...
#64 Darox thinks pushing a flavor claim is a bad thing? wtf?
#65 by cry seems like a good way to push a bandwagon without adding anything new, or well.. anything....
I disagree with the asshole I replaced in #68.
#70 by Rashi seems good natured, but kind of um... well... it reads kinda funny
bionic #71. nuff said
#77 (yth) is right in the 2 millers in a game is whack.
#85(fhq) the vote on Lowell... no reasons... absolute crap... if someone didnt call him out on that im gonna be pissed.
#87(tony) is just retarded. I'm gonna quote this one actually...
So the natural thing is to lay a vote on someone without really leaving anything for them to defend... yea... makes senseTonyMontana wrote: But I also feel lowell was the one putting out the bait. He laid suspicion on me, and stamped it with a vote, without really leaving me with anything to defend or explain. I'd welcome another attempt, Lowell.
##unvote, vote: Lowell
I actually agree with bionic in #88...
Umm... #92 by Tony is umm... weird...
#95 is a good post to say (hey... if a bandwagon were to form on you, i could go back to my post and say ive been suspicious of you)
disagree with #102 (bionic) tho just personal thing.
Like bionics #103 though.
#104 by cry is like.. thanks for listing your suspicions on me, I won't say anything really about them.
#108 would like to see SOMETHING new for cry vote, still indifferent post though.
#109- Elias is scum.... i'll go back and look to see if he's played with Lowell before and if he has.... he is scum... there is no reason to vote Lowell if he has played with him...
#112 by fhq is reading weird to me. like umm... really weird...
#128 is meg by bionic.
#129 is Darox hopping in to vote Lowell for no reason. Hi Darox.... good to see you can come here to BW someone.
#131 vote on Lowell by Rash is bad. Points out Darox though....
#132 is absolutely.... totally.... shitty as hell.... scummy as hell... nothing good from that post.
#145... #145... uggh
<3 IAUN in #146 (know hes dead)
#148 Darox comes in with another hard hitting, impactful post.. wait... shit.... that was someone else.
#153 is an indifferent post in general, but I like it.
oh and good thing Elias unvoted, I semi- retract my statement from earlier...
#159 is bad in my personal opinion.... plus its a gateway post for a Lowell lynch.
#162 (fhq) umm
Dear awesome strong bad song from HS,fhqwhgads wrote: While it's not scummy in any way, it certainly isn't pro town either.
if it's not scummy in any way, it must then be considered town.
Love, PEG.
Like Yths fodder in 164,165
dislike #171
If Oman has played with Lowell... there is no reason for his vote in #183....
as soon as the Lowell wagon logically dies down, Tony in #196 comes on in and -1 Him.
#204 is more awesome Darox.
#230 is cry setting herself up to be able to hop onto a diff wagon whould one arise.
#233 is indeed a joke. (ironically true tho!, but a potential way to indicate as scum who hed like to NK, farfetched but not out fo the ?)
#242 is ok.
#253 (fhq) makes me go wtf.
#265- Oh what the hell Vote: Lowell.....(cry)
#268 shows that Darox clearly shows Darox isn't readin the game hardcore.
Darox shows up and posts an asswad in a short span of time! #296 is GREAT!!!!
This is my viewpoint after reading pages 1-12.
Oman.... I gotta check to see if this is your first Lowell game... if it is.... then damn man...
I'm going to vote one of these people(more than likely unless i way change my mmind next 12 pages):
darox
cry
tonyShowRumpelstiltskin Grinder
(1:55:11 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's ok drench
(1:55:21 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's perfectly normal for young children to walk in on their parents making love
(1:55:31 AM) Drench394: i can't wait
STREAMING:
www.twitch.tv/xxxpickemgenius-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2970
- Joined: May 10, 2008
- Location: The Future
-
-
Ythill Fabio
- Fabio
- Fabio
- Posts: 4892
- Joined: November 10, 2007
peg wrote:I will do it in three different parts 1-8 8-16 16-24
LAL!peg wrote:This is my viewpoint after reading pages 1-12.
Welcome. Your analysis is a little hard to read without a second window open for reference, but I agree with a lot of what you said. No major holes in it, though not much correlation either. Looking forward to the final product.
Deadline in two days, wolf @ L-2, and two people reading her as scummy. She should probably claim.Record:Town 10W/15LScum 4W/1LOther 2W/2LNewbie 1L
"So yeah, it is a sign from the angels." ~CooLDoG-
-
fhqwhgads Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 798
- Joined: March 26, 2008
- Location: South Africa
-
-
Oman NK Immune Miller Vig
- NK Immune Miller Vig
- NK Immune Miller Vig
- Posts: 7014
- Joined: June 19, 2007
-
-
fhqwhgads Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 798
- Joined: March 26, 2008
- Location: South Africa
-
-
Oman NK Immune Miller Vig
- NK Immune Miller Vig
- NK Immune Miller Vig
- Posts: 7014
- Joined: June 19, 2007
-
-
M4yhem Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: August 3, 2006
I find this unhelpful.Rashiminos wrote: Usually discussion of the nightkill is too WIFOMy to be of any real use. Reactions along the lines of thinking some of the Lowell voters are scum while probably correct are often misleading since townies are mixed in the wagon.
Ooops, I’ve just realised that yesterday I cast suspicion on the player I replaced.Elias_the_thief wrote:hi. I will sometime from today ro tomorrow and it will be awesome. Thanks.
**Replaced by M4yhem**
This seems pointless. It ought to be obvious how they feel about each other- Darox has been calling Tony scum and Tony has been attacking Darox hard. I don’t understand these questions; it looks like Oman trying to look busy.Oman wrote:Darox seems to be spanking Tony around, and Tony seems to be putting up strangely irrelevant defences.
DAROX: How do you feel about Tony, Town/scum etc
TONY: How do you feel about Darox, Town/Scum etc.
Where is ‘they are scum because...’ in this list of lynching one or the other?crywolf20084 wrote:Add-on to Fhq: Either Tony or Tommy would be a good lynch for today because:
A) If Tommy is gone, how long will Tony last without Tommy's defence.
B) If Tony's gone, what kind of opinions can Tommy bring to the table that haven't already been spewed forthwith by Tony.
I don’t agree. Withholding setup speculation is different from refusing to answer questions about yourself. The first is justifiable, the second is scummy as all get out.Rashiminos wrote: For being hypocritical about another player's withholding of information when he did it yesterday. Different context (wifom on user's role, vote reasons), but the idea is generally the same.
This is wrong. Ythill’s case is anything but rhetorical; it’s based on your actions within the game. He’s explained which actions of yours he finds most scummy, and why. You need to explain your reasons for those actions, because this won’t cut it.crywolf20084 wrote: What am I supposed to say? Basically everything you said was rhetorical.
This no-defence makes me think perhaps Ythill was right.
This is omgus and a logical fallacy: just because Tony doesn’t something bad (which I don’t think he did anyway) doesn’t mean you are excused. You still need to explain yourself.crywolf20084 wrote: How would you respond to something like that if it were posed to you, Tony. Oh wait. You hardly responded to the strait forward questions.
Okay, read done.
I’m wondering why Darox isn’t dead yet. He bandwagonned Lowell yesterday for no reason, overreacted when he was questioned and today he votes for Tony, again for no reason, and then makes stuff up to make Tony look back. Personally I thought Darox came out of their fight looking much worse; Tony answered his questions the first time (just because you don’t like the answers doesn’t mean he didn’t give them) Darox avoided giving any reasoning for pages and pages, which makes it seem like he just voted for the hell of it. Some of his reasons are also wrong- ‘justifying the nightkill’ for example, seems false; trying to work out why someone was killed is a helpful thing to do, because it can point us to possible suspects.
For that reason, I’m going to##Vote:Darox. I can see the case for crywolf, especially with how she fails to defend herself, but the case for Darox is much better and I’d like to see him hanged.-
-
TonyMontana Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: Norway
I'm liking this guy^
Truth be told, I would much rather prefer a darox lynch today.
But with the deadline approaching, and as I'll possibly be V/LA most of the weekend, I don't wanna risk a no-lynch.
If I see a shift sometime today or tmorrow, I will move my vote.UpcomingMiniTheme: Rainbow Six|Siege Mafia-
-
gorckat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: January 17, 2007
- Location: Bawlmer, Hon!
-
-
bionicchop2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: March 12, 2008
I don't see why this lynch option is being reconsidered 48 hours away from deadline (a deadline which would result in a no lynch if a true majority is not reached).M4yhem wrote: For that reason, I’m going to ##Vote:Darox. I can see the case for crywolf, especially with how she fails to defend herself, but the case for Darox is much better and I’d like to see him hanged.
6 to lynch and 10 players alive (side note - lynching with even numbers sucks so hard). Darox isn't going to vote for himself, leaving 9 players left. If Darox was scum, that would leave 7 town players left to vote for Darox. With your vote, then 5 out of 6 town players would need to vote Darox in the next 48 hours (players who have obviously decided to vote elsewhere or not at all).
Now if Darox is town, the lynch could happen pretty easily since 3 scum are available to vote. This would be especially convenient if Crywolf is scum herself.
Why would you choose to not put crywolf at L-1 and force a claim here if you can see the case against her? This would give the maximum time for a claim to be considered by everybody and a lynch decision to be made.
The entire concept reeks of trying to derail the Crywolf wagon for a quick wagon on Darox (but still covering yourself by agreeing with the case on Crywolf). Maybe this hunch stems from having Elias as one of my top suspects and the previous location for my vote.The above written statement is pro-town.-
-
bionicchop2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: March 12, 2008
-
-
M4yhem Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: August 3, 2006
I thought she was under enough pressure already and I think Darox is scummier.bionicchop2 wrote: Why would you choose to not put crywolf at L-1 and force a claim here if you can see the case against her?
Not at all. I simply want my vote on my top suspect. I happen to know I'll be around to change it if a no-lynch looks possible.bionicchop2 wrote:The entire concept reeks of trying to derail the Crywolf wagon for a quick wagon on Darox (but still covering yourself by agreeing with the case on Crywolf).
Yes, probably.bionicchop2 wrote:Maybe this hunch stems from having Elias as one of my top suspects and the previous location for my vote.-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
I'm the doc? Yeah, so I've made some poor choices in my wording sometimes but truthfully i've done my damnedest to find the scum. Lynch me or whatever.bionicchop2 wrote:Actually, considering our circumstances, I am requesting Crywolf claim in her next post as opposed to waiting for L-1. I would like a full claim with flavor to give us time to analyze.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
bionicchop2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: March 12, 2008
Point 2 is fine (although I disagree with the approach). P1, I don't think there can ever be 'enough pressure' if someone is suspected scum and you want a claim out of them. Cry has already displayed a myriad of excuses (my be legit) which have delayed promised posts. I feel the maximum pressure to claim needs to be applied to her or we run the risk of not getting one.M4yhem wrote:
I thought she was under enough pressure already and I think Darox is scummier.bionicchop2 wrote: Why would you choose to not put crywolf at L-1 and force a claim here if you can see the case against her?
Not at all. I simply want my vote on my top suspect. I happen to know I'll be around to change it if a no-lynch looks possible.bionicchop2 wrote:The entire concept reeks of trying to derail the Crywolf wagon for a quick wagon on Darox (but still covering yourself by agreeing with the case on Crywolf).
The above written statement is pro-town.-
-
bionicchop2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: March 12, 2008
A claim with a question mark? Please include the flavor as was asked for in the original request. Name of character and brief, loose paraphrase of the description without quoting the mod.crywolf20084 wrote:
I'm the doc? Yeah, so I've made some poor choices in my wording sometimes but truthfully i've done my damnedest to find the scum. Lynch me or whatever.bionicchop2 wrote:Actually, considering our circumstances, I am requesting Crywolf claim in her next post as opposed to waiting for L-1. I would like a full claim with flavor to give us time to analyze.The above written statement is pro-town.-
-
bionicchop2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: March 12, 2008
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.