Welp, touche. I'd argue that two votes does not necessarily a bandwagon make, and that also my reasons for voting Jebus were far more specific and detailed than were DoS's.Save The Dragons wrote:The first quote is where he voted, the second quote gives precedent for a bandwagon. You voted Jebus on the 25th.
That there's two kinds of "bandwagoning" and that mine was the good kind.Save The Dragons wrote:Sure. Your point?DraketheFake wrote:2. I added new, specific reasons why I found his post suspicious.
I mean, given that there were only three votes on Jebus there's technically also a chance that there weren't scum on the Jebus wagon and he's still a townie. As long as we're being thorough.Save The Dragons wrote:I don't know if you can have your cake and eat it too with this one.Either Jebus is scum, or scum are pushing a wagon on Jebus.I mean, I suppose it's possible that scum don't like winning and would force a wagon on themselves day 1 when it would be easier to pursue better options.
But I'm confused as to why that was your response to what I said. Vi said that he was suspicious of wolf for his vote on Natirasha earlier, and that his suspicions were heightened when wolf didn't jump on the Jebus wagon, as if it were somehow scummy not to bandwagon somebody. It's particularly bad logic because if wolf