Mini 673 - Game Over!

Haterade · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Sat Sep 27, 2008 6:34 am

Simenon wrote:I'd be willing to support a has wagon. Post 114 was silly.

Pretty much all of his posts have been fishy.

Flameaxe · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Sat Sep 27, 2008 7:21 am

Haterade wrote:
Simenon wrote:I'd be willing to support a has wagon. Post 114 was silly.
Pretty much all of his posts have been fishy.

Going through and explaining with examples makes this statement BETTER!

Flameaxe · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:54 am

Tomato wrote:I added my name because I don't think I'm posting enough content, and that's a bit of a reminder for me to do so. Which is hopefully coming tomorrow.

So far, all I've done is prod lurkers, which is not content.

Tomorrow, eh? *cough*

Simenon · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:57 am

We have nine days. Someone better have a damn good reason why our votes shouldn't go to scot, fuzzy, or hasdg at this point.

I'd prefer to switch to the has wagon if necessary over fuzzy, but I think the scot wagon is good enough right now.

Tomato · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:59 am

Flameaxe wrote:
Tomato wrote:I added my name because I don't think I'm posting enough content, and that's a bit of a reminder for me to do so. Which is hopefully coming tomorrow.

So far, all I've done is prod lurkers, which is not content.
Tomorrow, eh? *cough*

I'm too busy

Coming tomorrow or else.

(Only possible excuse for me is 100% complete lack of internet. Consider myself forewarned)

Simenon · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:00 am

We actually have only a week.

We need a near-mass prod and more people on wagons.

Flameaxe · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:02 am

Simenon wrote:We actually have only a week.

We need a near-mass prod and more people on wagons.

I approve. And:

HI SIM <3

stark · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:23 am

My wagon is solid.

I missed why scot should have a wagon though..

Simenon · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:25 am

stark wrote: I missed why scot should have a wagon though..

Maybe you should have paid more attention.

hasdgfas · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:32 am

Tomato wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
Tomato wrote:I added my name because I don't think I'm posting enough content, and that's a bit of a reminder for me to do so. Which is hopefully coming tomorrow.

So far, all I've done is prod lurkers, which is not content.
Tomorrow, eh? *cough*
I'm too busy

Coming tomorrow or else.

(Only possible excuse for me is 100% complete lack of internet. Consider myself forewarned)

If you're able to make these kinds of posts, why are you not actually contributing content instead?

Tomato · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:06 am

hasdgfas wrote:
Tomato wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
Tomato wrote:I added my name because I don't think I'm posting enough content, and that's a bit of a reminder for me to do so. Which is hopefully coming tomorrow.

So far, all I've done is prod lurkers, which is not content.
Tomorrow, eh? *cough*
I'm too busy

Coming tomorrow or else.

(Only possible excuse for me is 100% complete lack of internet. Consider myself forewarned)
If you're able to make these kinds of posts, why are you not actually contributing content instead?

I can log on to the thread and skim, but to actually have insight I need to do more than that. It doesn't actually take that long to just type...

scotmany12 · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:21 am

Simenon wrote:
stark wrote: I missed why scot should have a wagon though..
Maybe you should have paid more attention.

No no one on my wagon has really explained why its a good one. Flameaxe says he is voting for me because he is gay, IH has simply said that his vote is a good vote, and then you and has are voting for me while there are tons of others not contributing as well. So yeah, no one has explained why I should have a wagon yet.

scotmany12 · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:24 am

Tomato wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
Tomato wrote:I added my name because I don't think I'm posting enough content, and that's a bit of a reminder for me to do so. Which is hopefully coming tomorrow.

So far, all I've done is prod lurkers, which is not content.
Tomorrow, eh? *cough*
I'm too busy

Coming tomorrow or else.

(Only possible excuse for me is 100% complete lack of internet. Consider myself forewarned)

Wait, are you too busy or do you just lac interest in the game?

stark · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:16 am

Simenon wrote:
stark wrote: I missed why scot should have a wagon though..
Maybe you should have paid more attention.

Maybe I'm not asking for an explaination because I missed it. Maybe I'm asking because I'm not satisfied with the reasoning behind the wagon.

Simenon · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:39 pm

stark wrote:
Simenon wrote:
stark wrote: I missed why scot should have a wagon though..
Maybe you should have paid more attention.
Maybe I'm not asking for an explaination because I missed it. Maybe I'm asking because I'm not satisfied with the reasoning behind the wagon.

Then phrase it intelligently.

scotmany wrote:and then you and has are voting for me while there are tons of others not contributing as well. So yeah, no one has explained why I should have a wagon yet.

You deliberately refused to contribute

and

you were the worst of the bunch. And nothing has convinced me to move my vote.

Simenon · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:39 pm

The fuzzy wagon is stupid.

scotmany12 · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:15 pm

I had nothing to contribute on. I was going to lie and comment on something that meant nothing to me.

dahill1 · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:36 pm

Vote Count

(3) scotmany12: (Flameaxe, Simenon, IH)
(3) fuzzylightning: (pickemgenius, stark, fuzzylightning)
(2) hasdgfas: (scotmany12, Haterade)
(2) FaerieLord: (Tomato, fuzzylightning)
(2) Tomato: (FaerieLord, hasdgfas)

(0) Not voting: No one

Deadline: Oct. 6th - time still to be determined

Prodding fuzzylightning and pickemgenius

Simenon · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:42 pm

scotmany12 wrote:I had nothing to contribute on. I was going to lie and comment on something that meant nothing to me.

And now you are contributing because of the bandwagon. This is what bandwagons do.

scotmany12 · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:52 pm

Simenon wrote:
scotmany12 wrote:I had nothing to contribute on. I was going to lie and comment on something that meant nothing to me.
And now you are contributing because of the bandwagon. This is what bandwagons do.

And your point is? How exactly does this make me scum?

Simenon · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:58 pm

scotmany12 wrote:
Simenon wrote:
scotmany12 wrote:I had nothing to contribute on. I was going to lie and comment on something that meant nothing to me.
And now you are contributing because of the bandwagon. This is what bandwagons do.
And your point is? How exactly does this make me scum?

Well for one thing this argument has been less than stellar.

pickemgenius · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:17 pm

Simenon wrote:The
fuzzy
scot wagon is stupid.

k fixed.

the only other wagon that looks even slightly legit is cows... but id still prefer fuzzy...

scotmany12 · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:35 pm

Simenon wrote:
scotmany12 wrote:
Simenon wrote:
scotmany12 wrote:I had nothing to contribute on. I was going to lie and comment on something that meant nothing to me.
And now you are contributing because of the bandwagon. This is what bandwagons do.
And your point is? How exactly does this make me scum?
Well for one thing this argument has been less than stellar.

Try again. This does not explain why you think I am scum.

Simenon · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 4:32 pm

scotmany12 wrote: Try again. This does not explain why you think I am scum.

Yes, it does. You were being deliberately dense, and apparently you're keeping up the act.

The fuzzy wagon likely has scum on it.

IH · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 4:37 pm

Checking in. Will make significant post later.