Saber (3): Caster, Beast, Saber
Assassin (1): Rider
Berserker (5): Archer, Alter Ego, Avenger, Ruler, Moon Cancer
(expired on 2021-07-04 22:00:49)
Page usage: 21/42
Apologies. I realize my gimmick of choice may not be the most readable. There is a balance between attempted identity concealment and readability and I am aware I may currently be too much the former. I am trying to slowly shift more towards the latter; give me about 72 hours and I am sure I shall have better struck that balance.In post 492, Servant Rider wrote:And then there's Ruler. Ugh. I don't want to read their posts.
Oh, the moment folks figure out my identity they will correctly townread me (and my identity is not hard to guess if I do not conceal my style with a gimmick). Yet, I am in no rush to out myself as I enjoy anonymity. However, I will risk this comment:In post 498, Servant Beast wrote:they seem confident they can be sorted and I'm just sitting here wondering why I can't.
Not uncommon from me as I am something of a D1 specialist, forming townblocs early and reforming them as needed later.In post 502, Servant Beast wrote:Their first post feels like they reached the right conclusions long before it was cool to do so.
If it makes you feel better: my vote on you is because I wish to keep the mastership out of the corrupts' hands, and givenIn post 491, Servant Berserker wrote:I also find my wagon composition disturbing. Which are the worst votes and why?
I am skipping your townreads as they are all servants I read as varying degrees being pure of heart.In post 504, Servant Berserker wrote:Lean TownServant Saber- I was not initially townreading them, until I did the review after talking with Beast. The points I found easiest to swallow were about their suspicions of the building master wagon on them, in specific the Moon suspicion listed in 235. I also had issues with the Moon reads list, and their justifications were weak. I found it town to be comparing his location to the other candidates and draw that conclusion.
162 is the opposite of a town confession; it is explicitly a corrupt player making an excuse for not having an easier time formulating reads. I can point to dozens of players who have used similar excuses when corrupt but none from players using it when pure of heart because it is inherently a corrupt excuse. 171 is an easy accusation to throw out as a corrupt individual and not one likely to be indicative of the accused being corrupt. It is in fact a post disproportionately likely to be made by the corrupt specifically because it is such an easy accusation to be made againstIn post 504, Servant Berserker wrote:Servant Foreigner- This was the hardest one on the list for me to place. It changed up slots upon my reread, for one post in particular. 162 is a town post, that's a town confession. Yes, scum has to remember who people are to fake reads and yada yada, but I don't think scum just comes out and says it. They have other good posts such as 171 which showed good gamestate awareness, and I think 388 is a little too blunt to come from scum. It isn't as strong as my other townreads, but enough to put him at the bottom of my town list.
By and large, it's because you haven't asked. I am all too happy to elaborate on a read when prompted to, but lacking this I am not going to do so out of the blue.In post 504, Servant Berserker wrote:majority of the comments are just "this post is pure of heart" without walking through the thoughts that make them believe that.
If it makes you feel better I believe even if my identity guess onIn post 504, Servant Berserker wrote:I could see it, however, providing plenty of backtracking via "Oh I guess I was wrong on who it was"
I would raise the counterargument of simple motive, giving the risk and reward of the action undertaken and what it would strive to accomplish as either a corrupt or pure of heart.In post 504, Servant Berserker wrote:- Originally one could have made the argument that such controversial reads in 226 were more likely to come from scum. Then, they change their entire list up in 462 after receiving a lot of flak over a few of these reads, one central one is their read on me. They justify the read on me in 238 (and I use the term justify lightly). The person who calls it out (other than me I believe) is Alter, their lowest scumread. There is no backtrack, there is no attempt to read me, just a strange flip. Even if they said "Well my strongest townread is pro-Berserker Master" that would at least make some sense. The backtracks feel too inorganic.Scum
Sorry mum! I'll try better.In post 470, Servant Caster wrote:I am very disappointed in the lack of serious effort/playing from Avenger
What's stopping scum from being assertive here though?In post 481, Servant Beast wrote:It should be noted hat all 3 of the people pushing for the grail position have been relatively good at being assertive and not very gunshy. I'd be somewhat surprised if any of them turned out to be scum tbh. I think this is just another game where scum have decided to be on the peripheral than to fight for the spot.
Hmm, this is interesting.In post 486, Servant Ruler wrote:Interesting because I can verify Servant Avenger's claim of having not received a PM on my main. I did not receive a daystart PM on any account other than this.
This has been the MO of a lot of recent scumgames. Do nothing and have us rip ourselves to shreds.In post 508, Servant Caster wrote:@Berserker.
Let's assume you're town. Your townreads are correct.
What do you suppose the scum team is trying to do?
Why have they chosen to not contest and allow you to just waltz into Town-Leadership and take Mastery without really putting up any kind of fight whatsoever?
Did you just POE in a game some people barely posted? So fakeIn post 464, Servant Moon Cancer wrote:I believe that the POE of {Alter Ego, Foreigner, Saber} has three scum. That obviously leaves one scum but I am sure we can find that one eventually.
Shielder hadn't even posted I believe.In post 518, Servant Foreigner wrote:Did you just POE in a game some people barely posted? So fakeIn post 464, Servant Moon Cancer wrote:I believe that the POE of {Alter Ego, Foreigner, Saber} has three scum. That obviously leaves one scum but I am sure we can find that one eventually.
why would scum desire to look dumb?In post 484, Servant Ruler wrote:Oh? And why did you assume 'bad' rather than 'corrupt' in my posting?
I’m sure you’ve seen the recent uptick in do nothing and lose scumteams, right Caster?In post 508, Servant Caster wrote:@Berserker.
Let's assume you're town. Your townreads are correct.
What do you suppose the scum team is trying to do?
Why have they chosen to not contest and allow you to just waltz into Town-Leadership and take Mastery without really putting up any kind of fight whatsoever?