Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults, mid-game alignment changes, moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not), secret win conditions, un-divulged non-randomness in player role/alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game?(Yes/No)
- Yes
Other Things to Mention?:
Discord is mandatory. There are four starting phases (Day, Twilight, Night, Dawn). The game is Multiball and features heavy dead interaction and role mechanics. Outer World game mechanics.
Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults, mid-game alignment changes, moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not), secret win conditions, un-divulged non-randomness in player role/alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game? (Yes/No)
"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae
Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults, mid-game alignment changes, moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not), secret win conditions, un-divulged non-randomness in player role/alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game? (Yes/No)
-
There won't be moderator lies, unexpected randomness / non-randomness, rest is fair game
Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults, mid-game alignment changes, moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not), secret win conditions, un-divulged non-randomness in player role/alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game? (Yes/No)
Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults,
mid-game alignment changes,
moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not),
secret win conditions,
un-divulged
non
-randomness in player role/
alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game? (Yes/No)
- Underlined are possible. Detailed in Spoiler below. I will answer questions about what is possible but not how it could be implemented in the game.
Spoiler: Here's what you know
There are five group-scum in the game. They are known as the Enemies of Justice.
Scum have daytalk and multi-task.
Scum cannot assign their roles.
Third parties may or may not be present.
There is one player who is investigation immune and is unaware of it. All investigations on that player that succeed will come back as "The Unknown", even if a player name is not a valid feedback for the investigation or if the player is not normally an eligible target. (Ex: An investigative result that would come back with a yes/no result would get "The Unknown" instead.)
The identity of The Unknown may change throughout the game with no choice of The Unknowns past, present or future.
There is one explicitly random element in the game. Any action is not impacted by this "randomness" in any way unless warned of the possibility of such either by this post or in their role PM.
No roles have "sanities" such as paranoid, insane, etc.
No Godparents or the like exist aside from The Unknown.
The Moderator hates town winning by night play, so you expect some misleading results that are not moderator lies. This includes guilty or innocents that change or are misleading.
Alignment changes are not possible unless explicitly mentioned in your PM. There is no cult or anything like it.
Alignment changes that do not violate the above are possible.
You can rely on anything the moderator says to be true at the point in time that I say it.
There are no other bastard elements other than what is described here.
You may ask
privately
if something is bastard and out of bounds. I will answer privately. If I feel it is necessary to announce, I will.
I will not likely announce unless it gets asked multiple times or its an oversight to be included here.
The goal of this setup is novel fun.
This setup is swingy and impossible to test perfectly for balance. You've been warned.
[/list]
Please do not enter my game into signups until December unless I bold here stating otherwise. I expect to be in trial during November and passing on duties to Morning Tweet is unfair.
Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults, mid-game alignment changes, moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not), secret win conditions, un-divulged non-randomness in player role/alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game? (Yes/No)
- Yes. This game is as balanced as liquid helium is hot. Expect anything and everything.
Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults, mid-game alignment changes, moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not), secret win conditions, un-divulged non-randomness in player role/alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game? (Yes/No)
- Yes. There are minor elements of randomness as well as deception in the form of going back on previously stated information. However, there are no ridiculous moderator lies, mid-game alignment changes, cults, secret wincons, or direct moderator influence.
Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults, mid-game alignment changes, moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not), secret win conditions, un-divulged non-randomness in player role/alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game? (Yes/No)
- No!
Amid the pressure of great events, a general principle gives no help.
- numberofpeoplewhojoinPicks but upper limit of like 25?
Are hydras allowed (Yes/No)
- yes
Your modding experience
- i probably modded at least one game at some point
Current modding commitments
- none
Reviewers
- i'll find someone
Reviewers agreed to FINAL version? (Yes/No)
- upick
Backup or co-mod
- MariaR
Backup or co-mod's experience
- she has modded at least one game in the last several hundred years
Backup or co-mod's commitments
- none
Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults, mid-game alignment changes, moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not), secret win conditions, un-divulged non-randomness in player role/alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game? (Yes/No)
-
it won't be like bastard bastard but it may cross the line in some point in this by the letter of the law. it will be no more bastard than any of my past games which have been generally agreed to not be very bastard.
the game will start around october 30th regardless of when it fills
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults,
mid-game alignment changes,
moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not),
secret win conditions,
un-divulged
non
-randomness in player role/
alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game? (Yes/No)
- Underlined are possible. Detailed in Spoiler below. I will answer questions about what is possible but not how it could be implemented in the game.
Spoiler: Here's what you know
There are five group-scum in the game. They are known as the Enemies of Justice.
Scum have daytalk and multi-task.
Scum cannot assign their roles.
Third parties may or may not be present.
There is one player who is investigation immune and is unaware of it. All investigations on that player that succeed will come back as "The Unknown", even if a player name is not a valid feedback for the investigation or if the player is not normally an eligible target. (Ex: An investigative result that would come back with a yes/no result would get "The Unknown" instead.)
The identity of The Unknown may change throughout the game with no choice of The Unknowns past, present or future.
There is one explicitly random element in the game. Any action is not impacted by this "randomness" in any way unless warned of the possibility of such either by this post or in their role PM.
No roles have "sanities" such as paranoid, insane, etc.
No Godparents or the like exist aside from The Unknown.
The Moderator hates town winning by night play, so you expect some misleading results that are not moderator lies. This includes guilty or innocents that change or are misleading.
Alignment changes are not possible unless explicitly mentioned in your PM. There is no cult or anything like it.
Alignment changes that do not violate the above are possible.
You can rely on anything the moderator says to be true at the point in time that I say it.
There are no other bastard elements other than what is described here.
You may ask
privately
if something is bastard and out of bounds. I will answer privately. If I feel it is necessary to announce, I will.
I will not likely announce unless it gets asked multiple times or its an oversight to be included here.
The goal of this setup is novel fun.
This setup is swingy and impossible to test perfectly for balance. You've been warned.
[/list]
Please do not enter my game into signups until December unless I bold here stating otherwise. I expect to be in trial during November and passing on duties to Morning Tweet is unfair.
I'd like to enter signups when there's an opening. My homicide trial is getting delayed until January at the earliest.