I've been pretty clear with my thoughts. If you review my ISO and still question why I've voted you, please ask again.In post 203, Shrek wrote:what are your current thoughts about me that made you wanna vote that way?
~ AurorusVox In post 46, Taco Hemingway wrote:I don't genuinely believe that Seanzie actually made that kind of leap of logic in accusing Shrek and I of fake interactions.
In fact, my errors in how I perceived them should have tipped them off easily that this was a genuine interaction. It's a complete nonsense conclusion that is meant to discredit 2 people at once.
In post 50, Taco Hemingway wrote:In post 47, Seanzie wrote:In post 42, Taco Hemingway wrote:your analysis thus far has 0 basis in logic. I have no choice but to conclude you pulled those posts out of your ass.Lol! The juxtposition of these two posts:PIn post 43, Shrek wrote:yeah thats a fair assumption to make tbh. it would be a good distancing tactic if it were the real thing so im fine with you thinking that until more info comes in. i know im town though so obviously i can confirm its wrong but i understand my word dont got much weight there. honestly im happy youre poking at stuff already tbh
Taco, is Shrek also basing nothing in logic here? Shrek seems to think my assumption is fair, perhaps wrong, but fair. You seem to have the exact opposite opinion.you sure have selective reading, don't you?In post 45, Taco Hemingway wrote:weird reaction to someone who just called you scum, wouldn't you say?In post 43, Shrek wrote:yeah thats a fair assumption to make tbh. it would be a good distancing tactic if it were the real thing so im fine with you thinking that until more info comes in. i know im town though so obviously i can confirm its wrong but i understand my word dont got much weight there. honestly im happy youre poking at stuff already tbh
In post 52, Taco Hemingway wrote:And you aren't suspicious AT ALL how he reached that conclusion?"In post 48, Shrek wrote:its an hour into day ooooone bro im not gonna get heated over a minor sus. its not like hes hard accusing or anythingIn post 45, Taco Hemingway wrote:weird reaction to someone who just called you scum, wouldn't you say?In post 43, Shrek wrote:yeah thats a fair assumption to make tbh. it would be a good distancing tactic if it were the real thing so im fine with you thinking that until more info comes in. i know im town though so obviously i can confirm its wrong but i understand my word dont got much weight there. honestly im happy youre poking at stuff already tbh
Not a single bit?
Because you and I both know its a garbage conclusion. So I know you should have a similar POV based on that.
In post 53, Taco Hemingway wrote:Oh yeah?In post 51, Seanzie wrote:It is a leap, sure, but it isn't a complete nonsense conclusion, and the point is to see how people react. So far, you are reacting very defensively.In post 46, Taco Hemingway wrote:I don't genuinely believe that Seanzie actually made that kind of leap of logic in accusing Shrek and I of fake interactions.
In fact, my errors in how I perceived them should have tipped them off easily that this was a genuine interaction. It's a complete nonsense conclusion that is meant to discredit 2 people at once.
Please tell me more
If you're scum here, I hope you know that picking a fight with me was a huge mistake and will be your undoing.
In post 55, Taco Hemingway wrote:I don't need to justify shit to you.
In post 57, Taco Hemingway wrote:Do you disagree with my assessment that you're full of shit?
~ AurorusVox In post 63, Seanzie wrote:I've already made my intention very clear. I'm seeing how you react.In post 59, Taco Hemingway wrote:Lmao just realized I'm not on my main and I can't just tell you to go search my meta and see for themselves what you think of how I'm playing so far.
Regardless, why point out I'm defensive? What's your intent with that?
So far you look like a wolf who is pissed off that you got called out early. It is possible I'm misreading the situation, and townies can get defensive too, but the way you're lashing out about it suggests that you aren't dispirited town, but instead are frustrated wolf.
I could be wrong, so feel free to town it up, but for now, you're going at the bottom of my list.
~ AurorusVox In post 60, Taco Hemingway wrote:Seanzie, honest question that's important: what's the expected townie response to you when someone makes something up against them? What do you expect a townie to do in that situation.
~ AurorusVox In post 79, Taco Hemingway wrote:Do you think this is an unreasonable conclusion to come to based on the first 2 posts?In post 19, Taco Hemingway wrote:So Shrek is an alt that's purposefully doing a gimmick. Cool.
T3 feels performative in their initial postings and replies, don't vibe with their tone so far.
~ AurorusVox ~ AurorusVox In post 103, Taco Hemingway wrote:So to answer truthfully - I fudged it a little. I thought genuinely that your question was a bit weird to have as a reply to anything, like a scum who tries to desperately look like they are solving right off the bat. It was something to latch onto to push off of and move the game forward. You are partially correct. It was a trumped up shade that was meant to elicit a reaction from you.
I find your immediate defensiveness from it and your recent doubling down towny.
~ AurorusVox In post 211, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 103, Taco Hemingway wrote:So to answer truthfully - I fudged it a little. I thought genuinely that your question was a bit weird to have as a reply to anything, like a scum who tries to desperately look like they are solving right off the bat. It was something to latch onto to push off of and move the game forward. You are partially correct. It was a trumped up shade that was meant to elicit a reaction from you.
I find your immediate defensiveness from it and your recent doubling down towny.like a scum who tries to desperately look like they are solving right off the bat
~ AurorusVox In post 126, tris wrote:i have never found defensiveness to be indicative of scum. not in isolationIn post 121, Seanzie wrote:Why? Because my push actually had logic (albeit loose page 1 logic) behind it? I noticed a possible teammate interaction. I mentioned it in thread. You got super defensive about it, so I pushed more, and eventually you OMGUS'd me at the end of it. This is typical wolf behavior.In post 100, Taco Hemingway wrote:Your push and my gutread on entrance are not the same. Stop comparing it.In post 97, Seanzie wrote:If you are concluding that this is reasonable, but my push on you was not... well... idk what to say.In post 79, Taco Hemingway wrote:Do you think this is an unreasonable conclusion to come to based on the first 2 posts?In post 19, Taco Hemingway wrote:So Shrek is an alt that's purposefully doing a gimmick. Cool.
T3 feels performative in their initial postings and replies, don't vibe with their tone so far.
The only thing that gives me pause on my read is the fact that I know you can be very rude and arrogant as town, so some parts of your reaction can be explained by that. I will have to see how you play moving forward, but your T3 "gut read" (Is it a gut read? Calling T3 performative doesn't feel like a gut read, but an analysis of his posts) is bad, so 0 points from me there.
~ AurorusVox In post 125, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay but I can't just take your word for it y'know.In post 122, Taco Hemingway wrote:regardless your read on me is wrong here if you are legitimately scumreading meIn post 118, Taco Hemingway wrote:oh nvm i misread your post i thought you said "despite"
In post 126, tris wrote: i have never found defensiveness to be indicative of scum. not in isolation
In post 127, Dwlee99 wrote:Tris we are town block now. Okay?
~ AurorusVox 
~ AurorusVox In post 144, Taco Hemingway wrote:Well generally, I expect a townie to react with defiance when accused of something that is implying they are scum. A scum would be much nicer because they know the accusation is true and thus seek to justify and placate.In post 139, Seanzie wrote:In post 133, Taco Hemingway wrote:Seanzie: I don't know how to expect a townie to react here
Also seanzie: i am so sure that taco is reacting like scum hereNope, that isn't what I said at all. Townies can react in all sorts of ways, so I cannot enumerate all towny reactions for you. asking "how would a towny react in this situation?" is not a productive question since it is unanswerable.
This should be able to explain my most recent movements
~ AurorusVox
In post 17, Pavowski wrote:Hi all! May the odds be in your favor, unless you're mafia, in which case, a plague on your house.
The gods have dictated that I should VOTE: Taco to kick things off, and so I shall. Even though I love your username.
@Shrek, if you use the "reply" button instead of the quick reply box at the bottom of the page, there's a button above the text window labeled "Vote" that will automatically format your vote -- you just put the player's name in between the tags.
In post 148, Shrek wrote:its like the first two hours of the game literally half of the people havent contributed yet. chill.
~ AurorusVox In post 167, Shrek wrote:town leaning:
taco: i think him acting defiant was kind of a bad look for him so early on in the game, but scum would probably not go THAT far to the point of attacking seanzie like that for simply throwing out a light read. like why would he start to tunnel there instead of just leaving it at a convenient point instead of going on with all the effort for several pages. that doesnt seem like mafia to me
~ AurorusVox In post 218, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 148, Shrek wrote:its like the first two hours of the game literally half of the people havent contributed yet. chill.When this chilling time of yours will be finished?
~ AurorusVox In post 167, Shrek wrote: i know im town so im not reading too much into it.
~ AurorusVox In post 173, Shrek wrote: if you want i can actually claim my role just so we dont like. mislynch right in the beginning of the game. i dont really care if i'm a nightkill since my role is not very useful and it would alleviate suspicion from me so i'm more than happy to be open right now.
~ AurorusVox In post 182, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Yeah I like shrek tonally. He feels open. Up to 141 I felt this already. He has a strange looking wall after that though, there were some points in there that feel wrong to me.
~ AurorusVox
oh I'm copying scum osuka's game.. in a game that I was scum in?In post 206, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 46, Taco Hemingway wrote:I don't genuinely believe that Seanzie actually made that kind of leap of logic in accusing Shrek and I of fake interactions.
In fact, my errors in how I perceived them should have tipped them off easily that this was a genuine interaction. It's a complete nonsense conclusion that is meant to discredit 2 people at once.Defensive response.
In post 50, Taco Hemingway wrote:In post 47, Seanzie wrote:In post 42, Taco Hemingway wrote:your analysis thus far has 0 basis in logic. I have no choice but to conclude you pulled those posts out of your ass.Lol! The juxtposition of these two posts:PIn post 43, Shrek wrote:yeah thats a fair assumption to make tbh. it would be a good distancing tactic if it were the real thing so im fine with you thinking that until more info comes in. i know im town though so obviously i can confirm its wrong but i understand my word dont got much weight there. honestly im happy youre poking at stuff already tbh
Taco, is Shrek also basing nothing in logic here? Shrek seems to think my assumption is fair, perhaps wrong, but fair. You seem to have the exact opposite opinion.you sure have selective reading, don't you?In post 45, Taco Hemingway wrote:weird reaction to someone who just called you scum, wouldn't you say?In post 43, Shrek wrote:yeah thats a fair assumption to make tbh. it would be a good distancing tactic if it were the real thing so im fine with you thinking that until more info comes in. i know im town though so obviously i can confirm its wrong but i understand my word dont got much weight there. honestly im happy youre poking at stuff already tbhShadingSeanzie.
In post 52, Taco Hemingway wrote:And you aren't suspicious AT ALL how he reached that conclusion?"In post 48, Shrek wrote:its an hour into day ooooone bro im not gonna get heated over a minor sus. its not like hes hard accusing or anythingIn post 45, Taco Hemingway wrote:weird reaction to someone who just called you scum, wouldn't you say?In post 43, Shrek wrote:yeah thats a fair assumption to make tbh. it would be a good distancing tactic if it were the real thing so im fine with you thinking that until more info comes in. i know im town though so obviously i can confirm its wrong but i understand my word dont got much weight there. honestly im happy youre poking at stuff already tbh
Not a single bit?
Because you and I both know its a garbage conclusion. So I know you should have a similar POV based on that.Pocketing attempt toShrek.
In post 53, Taco Hemingway wrote:Oh yeah?In post 51, Seanzie wrote:It is a leap, sure, but it isn't a complete nonsense conclusion, and the point is to see how people react. So far, you are reacting very defensively.In post 46, Taco Hemingway wrote:I don't genuinely believe that Seanzie actually made that kind of leap of logic in accusing Shrek and I of fake interactions.
In fact, my errors in how I perceived them should have tipped them off easily that this was a genuine interaction. It's a complete nonsense conclusion that is meant to discredit 2 people at once.
Please tell me more
If you're scum here, I hope you know that picking a fight with me was a huge mistake and will be your undoing.ThreatingSeanzie.
In post 55, Taco Hemingway wrote:I don't need to justify shit to you.In post 57, Taco Hemingway wrote:Do you disagree with my assessment that you're full of shit?Scum posts.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=86324
Check this game, they arecopyingscum!osuka's play here.
VOTE: Taco Hemingway