Mafia 85 - Murder at the Bus Stop (game over)

[al4xz]

...That was odd.

Mod edit
Votecount:
Sir Tornado (2): Moratorium, BlakAdder
Empking (2): RestFermata, Sir Tornado
Surye (2): Demon Pineapple, farside22
Wall-E (1): Mana_Ku
Cream147 (1): Empking
Slicey (1): Wall-E
Alabaska J (1): fouxdufafa
farside22 (1): martin413
RestFermata (1): Riceballtail
farside22 (1): Alabaska J
BlakAdder (1): Shanba
armlx (1): Xtoxm

Not voting (10): al4xz, Azuma, Cream147, Jebus, Slepz, DynamoXI, Megatheory, armlx, Surye, Slicey

[Moratorium]

Are you two married?

[Xtoxm]

He wishes.

[Sir Tornado]

Also, how is that not responding for Shanba?

Because:
a) It wasn't a question directed at Shanba
b) Shanba had already commented on that in the post before mine

[BlakAdder]

Regarding point A:

The way you've phrased it, Shanba, it seems like you're trying to get people to look back and find scummy things about my posts. That's the only thing I don't like about it.

I thought I had made it pretty clear that it was directed at Shanba.
Regarding point B:
That doesn't change anything. Why would you repeat exactly what Shanba said if you saw that he already responded?

[fouxdufafa]

Man, I was out for the day and I've already missed five pages. Let me take a look through these.

Sir T, I checked into one of your old games, Mafia 66(it took me a while to find a game where you were vanilla) and in that one you seemed to be answering questions and explaining your actions. I did this because earlier on you told us to look at an old game of yours to see that being dodgy is part of your meta. Perhaps you can direct me to a game where this is true? Because it doesn't seem that way to me.

Vote: Xtoxm

I know today is your first day, but if you have time to make all of those joke posts perhaps you could also find the time to look back into the ten page topic and find SOMETHING to form a serious opinion on. Even a small one, just to hold us over until you're all caught up? If this is the first chance you've had to join in on the topic why waste time joke voting well after the random vote stage, joke reasoning about said vote, and then joke claiming? Not that I don't want to have fun here, but that's a little too much joking around and not enough playing.

[Jebus]

He did that in FinalFantasy (still ongoing), and turned out town. Just plain confusing, I guess.

And sorry for my lurking, I've not had much time to read over the whole topic.

[armlx]

He did that in FinalFantasy (still ongoing), and turned out town. Just plain confusing, I guess.

Shh.... no talking about ongoing games.

And he was joking here.

[fouxdufafa]

Alright, fair enough. I'm not particularly moved by the Sir T case right now either way. I just thought it was strange that he'd tell us to go look to see that that's his meta when it doesn't seem to be. The game I found was pretty old, though.

[Cream147]

Xtoxm, you realise we are out of the random stage, ja? Then go and read!

[Alabaska J]

unvote, vote: farside22

for giving into Sir T.

Also armlx vs. Sir T looks townie v. townie at the moment. Just wanted to say this before it blows up into a full-blown thing and someone gets lynched.

I didn't give in to Sir T. I read what was said about what voting and even random voting should have a purpose. I usually don't think about random voting meaning anything. But voting for someone even as a random vote who is on V/LA means nothing. Might as well voted for myself.

wait what?

I don't understand what you are trying to say here.

Still think you were trying to deflect attention away from yourself early when you were called out on your random vote. If it truly didn't mean anything, why did you feel the need to change it?

[Alabaska J]

However, after reading the past four pages or so, I like the BlckAdder wagon much better.

unvote, vote: BlckAdder

No comment on armlx besides the fact that I know what he was trying to do and I am not going to make a huge deal out of nothing.

[Sir Tornado]

Fauxdafafa, Mafia 66 was one of my first games. I played differently back then.

I have posted 3 games which are fairly old (at least a year or so), but newer than Mafia 66 which more or less confirm the meta a couple of pages ago. (and, my meta is not necessarily town specific)

And, by the way, I feel you are blowing things out of proportion a bit. I HAVE explained most of my play in this game too, and unlike what a few people might say, I have answered most questions too as long as they were not stupid ones.

BlakAdder, do you think I should ignore discussions between you and Shanba completely? If I see you make a scummy or strange point to players other than me, I will still point it out. Deal with it.

(and, you still haven't answered my question, btw)

[Sir Tornado]

Deadline: 4 O

k

tober-ish

Perhaps you've had a pint or two more than you should this year? :p

[RestFermata]

I do not find Sir Tornado scummy at this point, but I am not getting any town tells from him, either. When I have that kind of reaction to someone, it kind of worries me because I usually end up feeling pretty neutral about that player for the rest of the game. So I'll be keeping my eye on him if only for that reason, so he can't wriggle away from my scumdar.

I don't know how al4xz got away with saying this:

Of course. Mega, by doing this, unintentionally or not, you've caused a stir of talking that both allows you to pretend your contributing and lurk in the open at the same time. Though, if it helps, I don't think you're too scummy. But perhaps that's because you're not contributing much. *glares* Whoooo aaarr uuuu? *chuckles*

when al4xz hasn't been contributing much more. All his posts have been about lynching lurkers. I haven't really been a major contributor myself thus far, but I don't want to be hypocritical about it and accuse others of doing the same. People might think I'm...trying to deflect attention onto someone else.

Alabaska J - Nothing yet, but after more posting I'm sure I'll have a stronger opinion. I'm not getting that "strong neutral" feel like I am from ST; I just feel like I don't have enough information yet.

OK AND NOW I HAVE TO GO TO CLASS. That was just a teaser.

[Lawrencelot]

Deadline: 4 O

k

tober-ish

Perhaps you've had a pint or two more than you should this year? :p

I was focussing so much on writing it with a capital letter that I forgot that I also had to change k into c. I hate "similar but not quite" words.

[armlx]

Self-metaing is WIFOM, except in this case of confirming thoughts on game theory.

(random game theory aside over)

Vote Megatheory

I missed the part where he attacked farside for the same random vote.

[Mana_Ku]

You should know hard it is, Sir T. I also make these mistakes some time .

In this setup LaL? What's the use of that? With every lurker that we lynch, we could lose a good poster due to the NK. I don't like this idea from al4xz. Weird, that I hadn't seen this yet.

[armlx]

In this setup LaL? What's the use of that? With every lurker that we lynch, we could lose a good poster due to the NK. I don't like this idea from al4xz. Weird, that I hadn't seen this yet.

LaL is dumb as its just saying "Lets replace the lynch with a random kill!". VaL (vig all lurkers) is a step up, assuming there is a vig, but its still a step down from just lynching/vigging scummy people and let the lurkers separate into people who get replaced and those who don't but keep lurking (which is scummy).

[Sir Tornado]

You should know hard it is, Sir T. I also make these mistakes some time

I was trying to make a pun related to Oktoberfest, but, well... forget it. (I am sure Lawrencelot got it though)

In this setup LaL? What's the use of that? With every lurker that we lynch, we could lose a good poster due to the NK. I don't like this idea from al4xz. Weird, that I hadn't seen this yet.

Hi. Would you want to comment on something

other

than lurking?

[BlakAdder]

What question of yours have I not answered?

[Wall-E]

@Tornado: Yes, I get it, which I quite clearly stated, but you're missing the point. Just answer instead of trying to disguise your answer in quotes.
@Shanba: Care to explain your vote?

No.

Don't do this. Don't start a case on someone and then refuse to provide evidence/thoughts. Do not.

[Sir Tornado]

What question of yours have I not answered?

I did not answer any question. I just pointed out that Shanba had already answered that question. Besides, did you not want to hear Shanba's answer?

Why are you complaining now that I pointed it out to you?

And, btw,

unvote

vote BlakAdder

to make it count.

[BlakAdder]

Right.
Answering your question, you did no such thing. You just repeated what Shanba said in slightly different words.

[Wall-E]

Right.
Answering your question, you did no such thing. You just repeated what Shanba said in slightly different words.

That's called original thought.