Micro 1000: Names on the List v1.01 [game over!]

[The Bulge]

THIS IS MY COUNTEROFFER

VOTE: MICHAEL SCOTT

my solve is mike/ythan/nm but I want to elim within the pool of 3 today

[The Bulge]

I'm tired of doing big long explainy posts and I'm definitely not putting effort into one now when given the trajectory of this game, a flashwagon might just actually be impossible, and I have better things to do tonight. but I'm here for a bit now so lemme find some shit I found while I was reading.

[bugspray]

wehats

[The Bulge]

Auro spent all of Day 1 defending moz and calling his wagon lazy. Then he votes him enthusiastically for no reason, and from that point on, volxen takes the reins and shifts their position to push for moz scum. The next time Auro posts he is now "conflicted" about moz, and makes his stance abundantly unclear, followed by volxen asserting that moz and Hatter are opposite alignments.

my theory here is that Auro correctly identified the town LHF in mozamis early on, and decided to pick up townpoints going against the grain. Once volxen came into the game and realized it was an actual potential miselim, I imagine there was some talk in the hydra chat about shifting trajectories. This would explain volxen's oddly lengthy and focused first post, if they wanted to take advantage of having two heads to justify the shift in trajectory, and would also obviously explain Auro's awkward backpedal into a "conflicted" stance on moz. Setting up a moz/hatter dichotomy also plays perfectly into that following night's list selection.

[The Bulge]

more later but I have to run for a bit now, I urge anyone online to give mike an ISO dive, it's really not long. pay attention to where they are putting their votes, the relationships between other players they try to set up, and especially how much energy they choose to dedicate to some parts of the game while ignoring others.

I will support a NM wagon if it comes to it but I strongly believe that eliminating within the pool of 3 could be a make-or-break situation for us, having 2 conftowns tomorrow.

[The Bulge]

ALSO mike completely ignored my long post critiquing their view of the gamestate and expectations for hatter's play, except to try and point me in the direction of Rathe. why didn't you feel the need to defend your viewpoints, mike? I think it's because they were fabricated. if you're town, you should be working with me to come to some sort of understanding, I think you're massively wrong about everything in that post and by extension I largely disagree with your view of the gamestate, so why would you just leave it at that? if you're town, work with me, either convince me im wrong or make concessions where I'm right. if you're scum, squirm i guess.

[Ythan]

I did think it's between Hatter and Rathe.

[Ythan]

do* think fuckin swype

[Ythan]

Koba's iso is mostly void of content and a lot of Rathe's is pretty directionless arguing but not I think hunting for scum.

[Ythan]

That's like exactly the same as Hatter though.

[Ythan]

I haven't really looked hard at anyone off the list but I can check out nm next.

[Ythan]

On the list rather, I meant apart from the three I was discussing.

[Ythan]

VOTE: Mozamis

k thought u would say something maybe better

VOTE: mozamis

This is a pretty gross sequence of events.

[Ythan]

Eyes are done reading for now, I will continue to think. I work early early and it'll be slow so I'll be around yet before noon. Think I'll almost out of posts anyway.

[Michael Scott]

@The Bulge:
If we were setting up a purposeful dichotomy between Moz and Mad Hatters, wouldn't you expect us to follow up on it post flip? I'm not even sure why we would hypothetically have to fabricate complex trajectories just to push LHF.

Honestly I've sorta been distracted by RL work and haven't been paying attention to MS, but I'm pretty happy with the N_M read. I'll review your post again and respond to it as soon as I can.

-Jimothy

[Rathe]

actually nevermind

VOTE: Michael Scott

[Rathe]

I did think it's between Hatter and Rathe.

y not michael scott

[Rathe]

y just me n mad hatter

[Michael Scott]

@Bulge, why are you more interested in my towncase on Hatter vs my scumcase on Rathe, when I’ve talked about the latter more than the former? You basically dissected every point I made in that post about Hatter, while you haven’t directly commented on my scumcase on Rathe, even after I reiterated the case again in 513. Your 481 suggested that you would be looking into this yourself, but then you never elaborated on how Rathe’s content affects your read on the slot one way or the other.

In fact, you haven’t really talked about your read on Rathe. All you’ve said is that you didn’t find Koba to be scummy upon a re-read in 521, which was the same stance you had towards the slot at the beginning of day one. Koba’s content aside, what do you find towny about Rathe?

- Date Mike (Volxen)

[Datisi]

vote count 3.07

with 8 votes in play, it takes 5 to make a decision. day 3 ends in (expired on 2021-04-09 17:05:00).

execution

Not_Mafia [3]:

Michael Scott, Dunnstral, Mad Hatters Tea Party

Mad Hatters Tea Party [2]:

Not_Mafia, bugspray

Michael Scott [2]:

The Bulge, Rathe

not voting [1]:

Ythan

game state

parity:

~ mafia members alive: three (3)
~

doom counter

: one (1)
~ town will be endgamed once they are brought down to:

three (3)

members.

previously published lists:

~ ythan, dunnstral, not_mafia, the bulge, bugspray ~ 3 town, 2 mafia

mod notes

~ 24 hour posting period will be resetting at 6:00pm CET
~ not_mafia has used 6/20 reserve posts.

[Datisi]

prodding dunnstral.

[Not_Mafia]

Just elim Hatter omg

[Mad Hatters Tea Party]

Just elim Hatter omg

Careful, should you keep shaking like that you risk bringing all the boys to your yard.

[Mad Hatters Tea Party]

Michael is absolutely not the elimination here.

The solve is Rathe, Bulge and Not_Mafia.

[Ythan]

I did think it's between Hatter and Rathe.

y not michael scott

Wow you really skipped over a ton of posts to ask that.