Figures one of you two would ask...Save The Dragons wrote:Who are the other two dragons you refer to?Microphone_Kirby wrote:Personal note: if these two "Dragons" in this game are anything like the other two "Dragons"... this game is going to be interesting... if it wasn't already for all the Kirby talk.
I got one of those tingles when I re-read this post. Its a tiny detail, I know, but it's awfully specific considering it was in the guise of an early-game joke post. Implied knowledge of the set-up... throwing out two possible roles this early in the game... it's got me feeling all twisty.Natirasha wrote:Oh, I'm King Dedede, and Vi is Waddle-Dee. Together, we make upamafia.
No, but I do find the implication of multiple scum groups with prior discussion thereof or prompting very unsettling. I also don't like it when players make alignment/role assumptions in theme games where certain characters are all but guaranteed to show up because it steers players toward trying to outguess the mod on the set-up.Save the Dragons wrote:Do you suspect that King Dedede and Waddle-Dee are a mafia group, and that Natirasha is revealing his alignment?
Right there Ku_F. Admittingly, could be just a bad joke, but with the previous post i made I feel like Nat could, and should, post something other then the self voting and saying him and Vi are a mafia.Natarisha wrote:I recognized it. but I think you know that.
Oh, I'm King Dedede, and Vi is Waddle-Dee. Together, we make up a mafia.
Read a little more closely. I said that DtF's Amazing Find was from an implausible source, to understate things. I believe that Natirasha's "reveal" is ludicrous given that it outs himself as scum, D1, without provocation, to a Town hard-pressed to find and lynch scum (and according to DtF, also to a second Mafia family who would love to gun down this first Mafia in the middle of the night). Yet you accepted this "implausible source" as 100% accurate as you voted him and implicated me.wolframnhart 61 wrote:Vote Natirasha for now. Since Nat had linked the two of them together, and Vi came to the defense of Nat from DTF's vote, there might be actual defense of a scum partner.
I haven't unvoted Ku_F simply because I haven't felt like it and the vote is of no consequence where it's at. "Not feeling like it" is also why I'm not going to vote you for jumping onto the Natirasha bandwagon when it has already been brought up that the "reveal" is dubious at best. But rest assured you now have my attention.wolframnhart 61 wrote:and Vi his assumed partner does still have his vote on Ku_F, even though I pointed out that the reason he had voted in the first place was flawed...
) from you was the first things i expected.
Natirasha wrote:Unvote, Vote: wlframnhart. Blatant bandwagoning. You took it hook, line, and sinker.
Seriously? To be fair, wolf's post doesn't present itself as a shining example of analysis. But yes, I also find the idea of laying "bandwagon traps" slightly ridiculous when the content level is so low in general and especially when the person laying the trap decides that not posting until there are 5-6 votes on him is a good idea.Save The Dragons wrote:Natirasha wrote:Unvote, Vote: wlframnhart. Blatant bandwagoning. You took it hook, line, and sinker.
It was a reaction test. And he tested positive. FOR SCUM.DraketheFake wrote:To be fair, wolf's post doesn't present itself as a shining example of analysis. But yes, I also find the idea of laying "bandwagon traps" slightly ridiculous when the content level is so low in general and especially when the person laying the trap decides that not posting until there are 5-6 votes on him is a good idea.Save The Dragons wrote:Natirasha wrote:Unvote, Vote: wlframnhart. Blatant bandwagoning. You took it hook, line, and sinker.
Save The Dragons wrote:Unvote, Vote: wolframnhart
This vote will probably change, but for now I'm fine voting for the most recent bandwagoner.
Try now.Natirasha wrote:Unvote, Vote: wlframnhart. Blatant bandwagoning. You took it hook, line, and sinker.
.