They are like chaining yeets off a bullshit post. Plus, I don't think Dunn is happening today, and no one has seriously pressured RTP.
Like this is such a fucking scummy response to getting called on a contradiction. It could be genuine! But this is also the exact way I react when I get called out as scum.In post 749, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Oh im mixing stuff up lolIn post 704, Datisi wrote:didn't you say you had too many scumreads earlier?
also ok, but how are you coming to partnered / associate reads then?
The fact is it doesn't make sense for me to do this as scum and if you were being honest you'd know this.In post 766, RLotus wrote:It doesn't make a lot of sense for him to do this as town.
My gosh, I've said I'm town so many times and in different ways and you still scumread me, so this is just nonsense.In post 766, RLotus wrote:Like, why doesn't he say yeah you're right about my meta but I'm town.
Well I'm usually in way more active games that allow me utilize my usual town fire. I feel like I'm repeating myself, which I have been.In post 766, RLotus wrote:He's trying to explain away why he hasn't been solvy and lacks his usual town fire, while also trying to survive with AtE (which I've noticed you tend to be susceptible to).
I've already explained multiple times why I've felt the way I felt but you refuse to accept it so I'm done trying.In post 766, RLotus wrote:No backbone that I normally see from him when he's town. He's just rolling over and dying.
There's context here man. Context! I just feel like you aren't playing this game honestly. I've said you are probably just townie tunneling townie, but I'm not so sure anymore.In post 768, RLotus wrote:Defeatism isn't towny. Yall are letting him off way too easily. At most that post should be NAI.
In post 770, RLotus wrote:The fact that the Italiano wagon hasn't built up despite the fact that it has been talked about ad nauseum might be an indicator that I'm on the right track. Alternatively, it could just be a product of the stalled gamestate.
Are you willing to die on that hill?In post 826, VP Baltar wrote:Like this is such a fucking scummy response to getting called on a contradiction. It could be genuine! But this is also the exact way I react when I get called out as scum.In post 749, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Oh im mixing stuff up lolIn post 704, Datisi wrote:didn't you say you had too many scumreads earlier?
also ok, but how are you coming to partnered / associate reads then?
"Oops, lol"
It defuses the situation and ideally, as scum, people stop talking about it.
You really haven't. You've said things like my towniness will shine through but you've not pushed back on the pushes on you until nowIn post 828, ItalianoVD wrote:In post 766, RLotus wrote:
Like, why doesn't he say yeah you're right about my meta but I'm town.
My gosh, I've said I'm town so many times and in different ways and you still scumread me, so this is just nonsense.
And you don't think that's a problem?In post 788, RLotus wrote:I've really got no clue past ItalianoIn post 779, Battle Mage wrote:RLotus - a quicker ask - who is scum besides Italiano?
Well shit you were the one throwing out a completely premature limpoolIn post 834, ItalianoVD wrote:And you don't think that's a problem?In post 788, RLotus wrote:I've really got no clue past ItalianoIn post 779, Battle Mage wrote:RLotus - a quicker ask - who is scum besides Italiano?
Well I based that on the way he was entertaining BM when BM was talking about me and him jumping on RTP just now. I think I recall him throwing out other names, like maybe looking for an elimIn post 837, RLotus wrote:Honestly I'm not feeling good about VP Baltar. It seems he is willing to jump onto any scumread thrown out there.
I am indeed looking for an elim. That's actually how this game is played. If you think I'm being inconsistent or opportunistic, which seems to be what you're saying, then please explain how that fits with me solo pushing a Dunn wagon for a good chunk of this game?In post 838, RLotus wrote:Well I based that on the way he was entertaining BM when BM was talking about me and him jumping on RTP just now. I think I recall him throwing out other names, like maybe looking for an elimIn post 837, RLotus wrote:Honestly I'm not feeling good about VP Baltar. It seems he is willing to jump onto any scumread thrown out there.
I don't think GC is really scummy, so yes, your analysis doesn't look great.In post 835, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Also do you disagree with any of my analysis thus far, and with what? Anyone whos played with me KNOWS you have to catch me as scum based on my reads.
My reads as scum are super stagnant. This is not the case here.
How about just tell me why you think RTP is town when they are locktowning your only scum read?In post 841, RLotus wrote:Welp I was making a post to highlight what I mean but my power went out I will explain later
Having a difference in reads isn’t a good basis for reading someoneIn post 843, VP Baltar wrote:How about just tell me why you think RTP is town when they are locktowning your only scum read?In post 841, RLotus wrote:Welp I was making a post to highlight what I mean but my power went out I will explain later
It is a good reason to be suspicious of someone. Not saying you can't disagree, but on D1, the only info you have as a town person is your own alignment. If someone is the polar opposite of you, that should at least raise a question in your mind.In post 845, RLotus wrote:Having a difference in reads isn’t a good basis for reading someoneIn post 843, VP Baltar wrote:How about just tell me why you think RTP is town when they are locktowning your only scum read?In post 841, RLotus wrote:Welp I was making a post to highlight what I mean but my power went out I will explain later
I'll save you the time. This is the first time all game I've followed anyone else's vote onto a wagon.In post 844, RLotus wrote:BM’s vote on RTP I’m pretty sure wasn’t meant to be going for an elim or apart of a scum read, but rather hold them accountable for the question he asked. That’s why you and Datisi going onto that wagon looks opportunistic. I have other examples of what I mean I will show you in a bit.
I totally disagree. At least, the way I try to read people is how they come to their reads and how they’re progressing the game. Day 1 is when town should have the most varied readsIn post 846, VP Baltar wrote:It is a good reason to be suspicious of someone. Not saying you can't disagree, but on D1, the only info you have as a town person is your own alignment. If someone is the polar opposite of you, that should at least raise a question in your mind.In post 845, RLotus wrote:Having a difference in reads isn’t a good basis for reading someoneIn post 843, VP Baltar wrote:How about just tell me why you think RTP is town when they are locktowning your only scum read?In post 841, RLotus wrote:Welp I was making a post to highlight what I mean but my power went out I will explain later
I've already had this convo once with andres.
